Reminder: Reddit powermod who recently died /u/Carmac was named in the CTR dox by /pol/ and was a heavy user in Shareblue run subs. Also, be warned that this thread is going to HEAVILY brigaded because "don't speak ill of the dead!"
515 2017-07-31 by [deleted]
[deleted]
364 comments
1 BelieveInCardigans 2017-07-31
http://www.sneadfuneralhome.net/fh/obituaries/obituary.cfm?o_id=4306039&fh_id=11996
1 lluvli 2017-07-31
Damn he's as ugly as you could expect! It's not surprising he was a /r/Liberal mod and /r/politics poster. Hahaha.
1 borch3jackdaws 2017-07-31
Grow the fuck up.
1 monsterismyfriend 2017-07-31
What a shitty thing to say
1 mjbmitch 2017-07-31
Do you have a link to what /pol/ found?
1 BelieveInCardigans 2017-07-31
Literal dox. Their addresses, personal phone numbers, etc. A quick search about CTR and /pol/ will bring up their archives.
But not posting, admins will already be raging that this thread exists and a genuine dox will be their excuse to perma ban now (rather than a month later quietly).
1 kit8642 2017-07-31
Then take a screen shot and edit out his info besides his name, we already know his name from the Worldnews mods.
1 LeeHaarvey 2017-07-31
I think I found the CTR dox thread, and I don't see his name on the list.
1 Belmont_Trevor 2017-07-31
need to allow doxxing when it's for a good cause. benefits of the many outweigh benefits of the few
1 ghettobx 2017-07-31
Who gets to decide if it's a good cause or not?
1 verello 2017-07-31
Doing bad things to people for a "good reason"? Where are those brown shirts when you need them...
1 knee-of-justice 2017-07-31
But remember everyone, what CNN did was literally the worst thing ever but this was okay.
1 cholera_or_gonorrhea 2017-07-31
Why am I remembering some anon saying (paraphrasing), "Oh and CTR and ShareBlue, your time is coming to an end. You have been warned."
Anyone else remember this or am I gonna have to go try to pull it up somewhere?
1 RecoveringGrace 2017-07-31
I vaguely remember. There has been so much anon stuff lately I can't keep up (and I try to ignore it until it's substantiated, lol.)
1 mcvey 2017-07-31
I'm pretty sure that gets said every day.
1 snowmandan 2017-07-31
Pretty sure that was WHanon or alien larper on 4chan
1 Belmont_Trevor 2017-07-31
was it the proven wrong anon who lied and nothing happened on 7/27?
1 cholera_or_gonorrhea 2017-07-31
...except that tiny, minor, little detail of calling for an investigation into the Clintons by sneaking it in as a trojan horse in the Dems' own bill. But other than that, nothing.
1 octodo 2017-07-31
From 4chan:
and
None of the above happened.
1 Belmont_Trevor 2017-07-31
fake news unfortunately
1 MissType 2017-07-31
Can't come soon enough.
1 Amos_Quito 2017-07-31
Removed. Rule 5.
1 BelieveInCardigans 2017-07-31
You wanna completely re-evaluate that and put the thread back?
Those links are directly what WorldNews mods have posted AT THE STICKIED THREAD AT THE TOP OF WORLDNEWS .
https://www.reddit.com/r/worldnews/comments/6qn7mi/we_regret_to_inform_you_that_one_of_our_beloved/?utm_content=comments&utm_medium=hot&utm_source=reddit&utm_name=worldnews
100% no private information/doxing/family.
This information has been posted by mods in the top stickied thread on a default sub.
So no, it doesn't break rule 5.
1 AutoModerator 2017-07-31
While not required, you are requested to use the NP (No Participation) domain of reddit when crossposting. This helps to protect both your account, and the accounts of other users, from administrative shadowbans. The NP domain can be accessed by replacing the "www" in your reddit link with "np".
I am a bot, and this action was performed automatically. Please contact the moderators of this subreddit if you have any questions or concerns.
1 Amos_Quito 2017-07-31
Yeah, I get your point, but Reddit Admins are hardcore when it comes to PI and Doxxing - and the info in the obituary has names and locations of family.
Also, WorldNews is not constantly in the CROSSHAIRS of Admins - Conspiracy is.
I have asked for second opinions in the ModMail, and in any case, I will not ban you or note your account for any infraction.
Thanks for your understanding.
1 Manalore 2017-07-31
You should also remove the tag from the top of the thread, where it is still visibile to all people just now seeing it.
1 Amos_Quito 2017-07-31
Done.
1 Manalore 2017-07-31
Appreciated!
1 037_Engineering 2017-07-31
When the obit is published it becomes public record. linking to the obit is not doxxing anymore than saying the president lives at 1600 Pennsylvania Avenue.
1 Murtank 2017-07-31
He is just being cautious people. When you start investigating a lefty idol you absolutely are under the reddit administrations microscope
1 ghettobx 2017-07-31
Muh lefties!!
1 The_Pyle 2017-07-31
Um... this thread is supporting the doxing of users. Did you miss this part of the title
Need I remind you that you guys banned direct CNN submissions because they DIDNT dox someone. But this thread that supports /pol/ doxing is alright?
1 Katayani108 2017-07-31
If the information is viable I don't care how it is obtained.
1 ghettobx 2017-07-31
Fortunately, others do care.
1 Amos_Quito 2017-07-31
"Supporting"?
No, the reaction was to CNN's intimidating/ blackmailing/ strong-arming a Reddit user by threatening to dox them.
Do you support Thug tactics?
To my knowledge, neither this sub nor Reddit has any prohibition against "supporting".
1 Belmont_Trevor 2017-07-31
marked down for the bad move
1 Amos_Quito 2017-07-31
Which one was the "bad move"?
Deleting or re-approving?
1 Benroark 2017-07-31
Thread's been linked by TMOR. Doesn't that mean it gets removed? Or is that only for threads that cast a negative light on Trump?
1 Amos_Quito 2017-07-31
LOL! We don't remove threads because of anything those impotent bottom-feeding clowns do.
TMOR links to many threads here EVERY DAY. If we removed every thread that TMOR linked to, this sub would be empty.
1 Amos_Quito 2017-07-31
Removed - Private information / Doxxing / Family
Thou Shalt Not!
1 BelieveInCardigans 2017-07-31
You wanna completely re-evaluate that and put the thread back?
Those links are directly what WorldNews mods have posted AT THE STICKIED THREAD AT THE TOP OF WORLDNEWS .
100% no private information/doxing/family.
This information has been posted by mods in the top stickied thread on a default sub.
So no, it doesn't break rule 5.
1 AutoModerator 2017-07-31
While not required, you are requested to use the NP (No Participation) domain of reddit when crossposting. This helps to protect both your account, and the accounts of other users, from administrative shadowbans. The NP domain can be accessed by replacing the "www" in your reddit link with "np".
I am a bot, and this action was performed automatically. Please contact the moderators of this subreddit if you have any questions or concerns.
1 BelieveInCardigans 2017-07-31
/u/Amos_Quito
You wanna completely re-evaluate that and put the thread back?
Those links are directly what WorldNews mods have posted AT THE STICKIED THREAD AT THE TOP OF WORLDNEWS .
https://www.reddit.com/r/worldnews/comments/6qn7mi/we_regret_to_inform_you_that_one_of_our_beloved/?utm_content=comments&utm_medium=hot&utm_source=reddit&utm_name=worldnews
100% no private information/doxing/family.
This information has been posted by mods in the top stickied thread on a default sub.
So no, it doesn't break rule 5.
1 AutoModerator 2017-07-31
While not required, you are requested to use the NP (No Participation) domain of reddit when crossposting. This helps to protect both your account, and the accounts of other users, from administrative shadowbans. The NP domain can be accessed by replacing the "www" in your reddit link with "np".
I am a bot, and this action was performed automatically. Please contact the moderators of this subreddit if you have any questions or concerns.
1 AddictedReddit 2017-07-31
Default subs don't exist anymore, fyi.
1 The_Pyle 2017-07-31
Dude you shouldnt be posting shit about doxing at all. I dont care what the mods say this shit coming from /pol/ isnt something you should be spreading or discussing.
1 037_Engineering 2017-07-31
Yes. Censor all the things.
1 The_Pyle 2017-07-31
When it comes to things doxing related, yes. Absolutely. 100%. Doxing is how subs get shutdown.
1 Blomkampf 2017-07-31
Also doxxing is not cool
1 037_Engineering 2017-07-31
It's not doxxing to link to obituaries. That is the purpose of obituaries. It's a public notification.
1 037_Engineering 2017-07-31
You've actually convinced me. Thanks.
1 Belmont_Trevor 2017-07-31
didn't convince me since it's not doxxing.
1 Ikantbeliveit 2017-07-31
Wasn't reddit just up in arms because CNN allegedly "doxxed" a guy for the Trump wrestling gif?
But now its cool when OP does it? That's low
1 CSTDude777 2017-07-31
Shut it down!
1 Belmont_Trevor 2017-07-31
never censor painful facts
1 qaqa1 2017-07-31
Burn in hell, cunt. I'd piss on their grave or snort their ashes if I could.
1 stainless_hardened 2017-07-31
You need Jesus lol
1 qaqa1 2017-07-31
Everyone needs the good lord.
1 rebuilt11 2017-07-31
Some more than others...
1 dwolfe447 2017-07-31
You need Buddha lol
1 True_Jack_Falstaff 2017-07-31
Yeah, people should burn in hell for deleting posts in a subreddit they moderate.
What the fuck is wrong with you people?
1 EarnestNoMeta 2017-07-31
😭😭😭
1 qaqa1 2017-07-31
Who?
1 DeathMetalDeath 2017-07-31
agreed they should have not covered the NICE terror attack. He did us a service.
1 GaslightManifesto 2017-07-31
Yep, all car crashes are orchestrated by the deep state. This is a well known fact.
1 SnugMeatSocks 2017-07-31
So can I send them a bill for curb rashing my new HRE CCWs?
1 Wlcome2theFuture2015 2017-07-31
Holy crap I would cry if I rashed HREs. Wouldn't go near any curbs with those!!!
1 SnugMeatSocks 2017-07-31
Im kidding.
1 seeking101 2017-07-31
i feel for you
1 HarryandWinston 2017-07-31
None by /pol/?
1 saintcmb 2017-07-31
man this is fucked up. You think he is guilty of censorship so you spit on his grave. The links you provide show me that he was a good man who cared about others and his country. You provide no links to prove he was guilty of censorship.
1 Diarygirl 2017-07-31
He seems to have been a great man but once again the rightwing here is convinced there's some conspiracy to censor anything negative to do with Muslims, which is just ridiculous.
I guess they hate him because he's progressive, a member of the ACLU and a community leader.
I guess liberal tears are not enough for them anymore; now they want to celebrate a liberal man's death.
1 saintcmb 2017-07-31
and devils advocate here, even if he was guilty of censorship, that doesn't undo the good he did. There so many places to get news from, one shouldn't rely on one source only. Not one of us is perfect. But this is very crass and tacky.
1 Murtank 2017-07-31
Gotta love when the lefties start circlejerking themselves to avoid a debate
1 brain_on_drugs 2017-07-31
No, actually if anything they are starting a debate.
The worldnews thread is only a couple hours old and people like OP are already politicizing it with implications that the person who passed away was a shill for ShareBlue.
Not only is it in poor taste but it shows how willing some people are to push an agenda.
1 Murtank 2017-07-31
Are you claiming you arent a leftist?
1 brain_on_drugs 2017-07-31
Are you going to continue avoiding the discussion with red herrings?
1 Murtank 2017-07-31
I think i have my answer but in case im wrong... you dont see how your comment that implies you are an impartial non-leftist might be troublesome if you are a leftist? Especially as i was addressing leftists...
1 Dustinationn 2017-07-31
Nope you're just an asshole
1 True_Jack_Falstaff 2017-07-31
Debate about what? OP has provided no proof for his claims. This is right-wing circlejerking.
1 Murtank 2017-07-31
Are you denying he was a powermod? rainbow push partner? ACLU member? progressive activist?
1 True_Jack_Falstaff 2017-07-31
There is no proof that he shilled for CTR or ShareBlue.
Oh, so you just don't like him because he was a liberal. Again, this post is nothing more than right-wing circlejerking.
"Let's demonize this dead guy, because he had a different political orientation than me!!"
1 Murtank 2017-07-31
do you agree that he had a bias that may have interfered with his moderatorship?
1 True_Jack_Falstaff 2017-07-31
A bias? Yeah, the guy obviously had strong political stances. Who the fuck doesn't? You obviously do too.
Did it interfere with his moderation? I have no clue, because nobody has provided any proof.
As I said before, this whole post is nothing more than a right-wing circlejerk trying to smear some guy just because he donated to the ACLU and moderated a subreddit.
1 KillerK0ala 2017-07-31
is it confirmed he moderated the subreddit? and is it confirmed he removed "unfavorable for the left" but relevant posts that otherwise followed all their official rules? not being sarcastic or anything i didn't see an actual confirmation of the dude being the mod.
1 Murtank 2017-07-31
I was just asking the questions myself... there seems to be a very active group today that is strongly opposed to even posing the question
1 yourmother-in-law 2017-07-31
Worldnews made an announcement about it this morning.
1 AutoModerator 2017-07-31
While not required, you are requested to use the NP (No Participation) domain of reddit when crossposting. This helps to protect both your account, and the accounts of other users, from administrative shadowbans. The NP domain can be accessed by replacing the "www" in your reddit link with "np".
I am a bot, and this action was performed automatically. Please contact the moderators of this subreddit if you have any questions or concerns.
1 Murtank 2017-07-31
Why are you cursing and overreacting like this? I simply asked a question
1 sweaterbuckets 2017-07-31
ugghh.. this comment was super cringe.
1 Murtank 2017-07-31
Uggh?
1 Bumbles_McChungus 2017-07-31
Same ones as usual :) Makes it easy to spot their bullshit threads, though!
1 Diarygirl 2017-07-31
I don't believe he was censoring anything. I can't tell you how many threads I've been in where people say "too bad no one will ever hear about this because the reddit mods will remove it because they love Muslims."
1 saintcmb 2017-07-31
I don't either. But its not an argument I wish to have.
1 UnverifiedAllegation 2017-07-31
unbelievable you got to those messages before the censors arrived
1 Diarygirl 2017-07-31
I know! Sometimes I felt I must be a time traveler.
1 meta4one 2017-07-31
You're clearly not paying very close attention to events transpiring..
1 Diarygirl 2017-07-31
I don't believe you have any idea of what I'm paying attention to.
1 TXROADWARRIOR 2017-07-31
i also don't believe you have a clue why anybody disliked him, let alone to lump them as "right wingers". they disliked him because he "was a community leader"?? yea right. you're clueless to the actual complaints raised and trivializing others makes anybody reading your comments the wiser
1 Diarygirl 2017-07-31
Yes, you have this bizarre idea that anyone that says anything anti-Trump must be paid to do so, and it's so ridiculous. Trump's approval rating keeps getting lower and lower, and you guys still keep saying the same thing over and over.
1 TXROADWARRIOR 2017-07-31
sun tzu said to understand the enemy, you've failed to understand who you criticize. trump supporters aren't identity politics
1 Diarygirl 2017-07-31
Of course they are. Trump supporters are the epitome of identity politics.
1 ___jamil___ 2017-07-31
sure... okay...
1 kit8642 2017-07-31
Please, the least OP could do is link to the POL dox of CTR to support his claim.
1 The_Pale_Blue_Dot 2017-07-31
This is a platitude if I ever read one
1 UnverifiedAllegation 2017-07-31
unless that liberal suits their agenda, like seth rich
1 Some-Random-Chick 2017-07-31
Seth was more progressive than liberal.
1 FnordFinder 2017-07-31
Progressives are liberals.
1 Some-Random-Chick 2017-07-31
Not necessarily. There is a clear distinction through core beliefs.
https://beingclassicallyliberal.liberty.me/classical-liberalism-vs-progressive-liberalism/
Seth rich was a Bernie supporter.
1 FnordFinder 2017-07-31
That is right wing propaganda and it's pretty obvious bias nonsense. The end quotes are a dead giveaway as to a clear bias and lack of any sort of intellectual honesty.
Try using something like Wikipedia or any sort of dictionary.
1 Some-Random-Chick 2017-07-31
How about some left wing propaganda.
http://m.huffpost.com/us/entry/9140
1 FnordFinder 2017-07-31
An op-ed on from liberal propaganda doesn't make nonsense any less nonsensical. Once again:
Here, I'll even help you educate yourself.
http://www.dictionary.com/browse/progressive?s=t
Words have meaning and they aren't subject to your personal opinion.
1 Some-Random-Chick 2017-07-31
From Wikipedia about progressives
Be sure to tell Wikipedia "words have meanings and they aren't subject to your personal opinion.
Also, be sure to look at the source(4) for that where it states
Funny how Wikipedia works.
1 HelperBot_ 2017-07-31
Non-Mobile link: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Progressivism
HelperBot v1.1 /r/HelperBot_ I am a bot. Please message /u/swim1929 with any feedback and/or hate. Counter: 96595
1 FnordFinder 2017-07-31
You realize Wikipedia is agreeing with me, and not you, correct? I said progressives are liberals. Liberals are left-wing.
"More or less left-wing way" is in complete agreement with my statement. So I have no issue with Wikipedia. Maybe you should read it again?
And once again, your second quote does the same thing. You're also once again quoting someone's opinion, which is amusing in itself, but you're quoting the opinion of someone who isn't helping your argument, which makes it hilarious.
1 Some-Random-Chick 2017-07-31
Fine, use it interchangeably, doesn't mean it's the same thing. It's like combining conservatives and libertarians.
1 FnordFinder 2017-07-31
You were just shown you're wrong and you still refuse to do any reflection or learn anything new. I feel sorry for you.
Enjoy the rest of your day though. I hope you'll eventually come around to learning rather than refusing new information. Maybe then discussion will be worthwhile.
1 Some-Random-Chick 2017-07-31
You clearly missed the point where Americans can redefine words. Only in American are these 2 words interchangeable by the right. Everywhere else, not so much. And then you wanna talk about personal feelings when the rest of the world sees it as two different things.
I hope you see the irony. Cheers.
1 ___jamil___ 2017-07-31
sadly that is no longer the case in the time of Trump
1 FnordFinder 2017-07-31
Which is why we need to stop allowing these people to get away with their bullshit and doublespeak.
"Progressives aren't liberal."
"Socialism and Fascism are really both leftist ideologies." or "Nazis were really socialists/liberals/leftists." (This one is just fucking ridiculous)
And the never-ending LARPs on top of that.
1 ___jamil___ 2017-07-31
it's not entirely ridiculous, it just misses the whole point. the Nazis were literally the party named National Socialists, but to call them "socialists" by the terms that we understand today is quite different. Their emphasis on nationalism (and fascism) really overshadowed their interest in seizing the means of production for labor.
This is what a lot of people on the modern right do. They take a tiny grain of truth and then use it to extrapolate into their fantasy land, in order to craft their narrative. It's far more devious than just lying, as you have to admit that they aren't entirely wrong - which to many stupid people, is conceding the whole point.
1 LE_UNITED_SUCKS 2017-07-31
I think you got it the other way around man. Some liberals are progressives, but not all liberals. Not all progressives are liberals either.
1 FnordFinder 2017-07-31
"Progressives" as a term is used for liberals. It's even in the definition of the word.
http://www.dictionary.com/browse/progressive?s=t
I'll specifically quote a couple:
And another:
1 saintcmb 2017-07-31
Nobody celebrated the death of Seth Rich.
1 hiphopapotamus1 2017-07-31
I'm banned from world news. Never said anything warranting a ban. I just acknowledged that Islam requires reform and has no means of self reform at the moment.
1 Fuckreddit-hivemind 2017-07-31
As an older progressive liberal, I find that the younger generation will go out of their way to support anything that could potentially get them viewed as a racist if they didn't support it. At every turn I see younger people reading race and bigotry into the most inane subjects. This is not a good thing. It's a barrier to truth. Which should be everyone's ultimate goal. To find the truth.
1 Ahem_Sure 2017-07-31
Grow up his. His grave is somewhere in Alabama and OP can't spit that far.
1 saintcmb 2017-07-31
don tell me what to do, or assume Im immature because I think its tacky to talk shit about people that just died. Im grown, that is why I understand it isn't cool or edgy to be disrespectful.
1 Micro-Naut 2017-07-31
So if Donald Trump were to die, there would be nothing but praise? At least in your world right?
1 saintcmb 2017-07-31
no, lots of people would be celebrating. It would still be tacky and crass. And these are two different people. One is a very controversial public figure. The other is a private citizen. I guess you could call him a controversial mod.
1 Ahem_Sure 2017-07-31
It was a joke, so maybe grow up a little.
Also, don't tell me what to do also.
1 saintcmb 2017-07-31
should have been clear from my first post I wouldn't find your "joke" funny. again, Im grown, I know the difference from a joke and being an asshole. Do you?
1 Ahem_Sure 2017-07-31
Sentences start with a capitalized letter sonny.
1 saintcmb 2017-07-31
this is how people get blocked. You have nothing to contribute.
1 Ahem_Sure 2017-07-31
I contributed to you getting that post 50% grammatically correct.
1 Belmont_Trevor 2017-07-31
fuck his grave.
1 187onamothafuckinMOD 2017-07-31
All mods are guilty of censorship
1 saintcmb 2017-07-31
Its kind of their job. Some take it to far and push their agenda, granted that. But its hard for me to call it censorship.
1 purefabulousity 2017-07-31
Seriously, this post is disgusting. The dude just died, have some respect.
1 NakedAndBehindYou 2017-07-31
1 saintcmb 2017-07-31
It more like OP knew he was being an asshole. Its pretty easy to predict downvotes on this one.
1 Iamamansass 2017-07-31
My eyebrows raised when i went through that thread. it was enlightening.
1 fuck_you_im_a_wizard 2017-07-31
Any links to the /pol CTR dox? Hadn't heard of it before.
1 cantsmokeme 2017-07-31
Not here
1 LeBlight 2017-07-31
https://giphy.com/gifs/jurassic-park-jeff-goldblum-there-it-is-11FiDF2fuOujPG
1 DeathMetalDeath 2017-07-31
his best role
1 SuperSpecialSauce 2017-07-31
So what's the conspiracy here?
1 Murtank 2017-07-31
the conspiracy is that your exact comment appears in every thread that criticizes or merely questions the liberal narrative
1 Tall_Trombone_Guy 2017-07-31
That's not a conspiracy, then.
1 Murtank 2017-07-31
Thank you for telling me what is not a conspiracy
1 Tall_Trombone_Guy 2017-07-31
Sure, you looked like you were struggling. Saw the smoke from here.
1 Murtank 2017-07-31
russians hacked my brain
1 Murtank 2017-07-31
Thanks for bringing your brigade too
1 Tall_Trombone_Guy 2017-07-31
Oh yes, all the users from r/eve I'm sure followed me. Don't be so condescending next time and maybe you too will get some upvotes.
1 TXROADWARRIOR 2017-07-31
you were pretty condescending... on the conspiracy sub!
1 Tall_Trombone_Guy 2017-07-31
Okay, thanks for the input. Glad you disputed his claim of brigading, champ.
1 TXROADWARRIOR 2017-07-31
there was nothing to dispute. pretty obvious what you have going on here. oh and yes i am a Champion*.
1 Tall_Trombone_Guy 2017-07-31
What do I have going on here? I'm sure you would know a thing or two about brigading, huh
1 TXROADWARRIOR 2017-07-31
This user:
"what do i have going on here?"
"you must know about brigading!!!"
Whatever you say internet person
1 Tall_Trombone_Guy 2017-07-31
You made a claim, now prove it, other random internet user.
1 TXROADWARRIOR 2017-07-31
prove i'm wrong
1 Tall_Trombone_Guy 2017-07-31
I don't have to guy, have you not debated before? Person A makes a claim, Person A had to prove it.
I swear, you t_d'ers have ruined this sub.
1 TXROADWARRIOR 2017-07-31
i thought you were an r/eve guy... or are you a conspiracy guy? the original comment you replied to said a certain string of words always shows up in certain threads... which (if you're confused) you replied with one sentence merely questioning not providing any evidence how you came to the conclusion. SO let's see your claim where you debunk the original commenter... in the mean time: how you don't understand the conspiracy shows that 1. you don't really understand the point of this sub 2. you aren't really an eve guy because all your old posts are about politics.
you won't get anywhere with me because i'm a champion (or champ as you say)
so which is it: debunk the original guy and practice what you preach or disappear?
1 Tall_Trombone_Guy 2017-07-31
Wow okay, where to start: I frequent r/eve a ton. It's the majority of my posts. I believe the original post in this claimed this isn't really a conspiracy, which it's not. I then I got accused of brigading because apparently people enjoy witty comments?
What am I supposed to debunk here, besides your lack of proper grammar and sentence structure?
Do you even know what eve is?
I'm glad you embraced your title though, it's usually a title of endearment for young children, which fits your style of typing and posting perfectly!
1 TXROADWARRIOR 2017-07-31
show me how you came to the conclusion it's not a conspiracy? prove it. you're just saying words. you understand the conspiracy because you say brigading in the same breath.. now show it's not. should be simple Mr spreadsheet simulator
1 Tall_Trombone_Guy 2017-07-31
Yes because spreadsheets equal words.
It's not a conspiracy because the guy died. It's a fact. Its also a fact he was liberal leaning. Nothing in this posts deviates from the idea that he was anything but those things
The only conspiracy I see was somebody taking a post from 4chan as gospel. Only a fool would believe the tales there.
What does brigading have to do with conspiracy? A user complained about downvotes and blamed a brigade. That's pretty typical.
You're making little sense.
1 TXROADWARRIOR 2017-07-31
see that wasn't so hard? you could've avoided all this by typing your thoughts and feels out. i have nothing else to say internet guy
1 Tall_Trombone_Guy 2017-07-31
Awww trying to deflect from your initial claim? How cute. You never refuted yours.
But that's how you tders work. Change the argument until convenient
1 TXROADWARRIOR 2017-07-31
well you were being extremely condescending so you can prove that yourself.
1 Tall_Trombone_Guy 2017-07-31
Already called it too, don't be triggered snowflake.
1 Naidem 2017-07-31
And there aren't even any threads criticizing or questioning the conservative or Trump narrative, it's almost like they are the one's brigading/shilling the most. I have yet to see a single thread or comment chain about the PACS doing the same shit for Trump that worked for Hillary, but I see Shareblue and CTR commented on CONSTANTLY. Biased much?
1 Murtank 2017-07-31
https://www.reddit.com/r/conspiracy/comments/6qm9y6/trumps_new_chief_of_staff_john_kelly_earned/
13 on the frontpage
1 Naidem 2017-07-31
Literally one, and it's rare, but while there are occasional threads assaulting those around Trump, where are the threads attacking Trump himself? We are CONSTANTLY barraged with threads about DWS, the DNC, the Clintons, etc., but less than a thread a day hits the front page about conservatives.
You also completely ignored my second point, where is the outrage about TRUMP's shills, they don't get a 10th the attention of Shareblue or CTR, and we BOTH know it.
1 Murtank 2017-07-31
Sprry there isnt the "right amount"
1 Naidem 2017-07-31
Mate, it doesn't exist. If you don't see the insane level of bias in this sub about shilling and "media collaboration" idk what to tell you. The vast majority of people on this sub aren't upset by "media collaboration" or "paid shills" they are upset by "Democrat media collaboration" and "paid DNC shills."
1 SuperSpecialSauce 2017-07-31
Please go through my comments and tell me where you see this, or would you rather just throw out random BS and look silly
1 Murtank 2017-07-31
You're aware I said your comment and not you, i hope
1 ghettobx 2017-07-31
Where's the conspiracy?
1 SuperSpecialSauce 2017-07-31
I read it personally, not as a generalisation. But still, the conspiracy is that people have different political leanings, and they speak out?
1 Murtank 2017-07-31
Was your question political? It seemed like you were questioning the conspiracy aspect
1 The_Pale_Blue_Dot 2017-07-31
Yeah because a lot of stuff that gets posted here isn't a conspiracy and instead is just regurgitated from T_D
1 Belmont_Trevor 2017-07-31
new rule, no one can post this every time on obvious conspiracy threads.
1 SuperSpecialSauce 2017-07-31
Well then explain the conspiracy here.
1 wut44 2017-07-31
Some people conspired to kill him with a fake car crash for being a corrupt reddit mod? /internetisseriousbusiness.
1 Mal_Funk_Shun 2017-07-31
brb, going to post a LARP on 4chan connecting him to Seth Rich and insisting it was Hillary who issued the kill order.
1 wut44 2017-07-31
Why always Hillary? Can't we give Trump some credit once in a while?
1 thatsaccolidea 2017-07-31
trump?? credit?? cunt doesn't pay his bills or his employees and you'd given him a line of credit?
1 sersers 2017-07-31
Good, there's quite a few other worldnews mods who need the same treatment.
1 Mucus_McCain 2017-07-31
Do you have any proof of him being a heavy user in shareblue?
1 NONAMEBLANKFACE 2017-07-31
do you have a source for this request?
1 UnverifiedAllegation 2017-07-31
'shareblue subs' = liberal subs. t_d members cant believe anyone who isnt paid can have liberal, anti trump opinions. soros payroll now rivals the GDP of the United states
1 Wowbagger1 2017-07-31
I mean I saw on 4chan that actually trump got 50 million more votes than Hilary one you take out the illegals and communists who voted for her.
1 Mike_McDermott 2017-07-31
so you mean everyone that voted for her? :P
1 DeathMetalDeath 2017-07-31
nope your forgot the dead. The vote heavily democrat.
1 NationalDenbt 2017-07-31
I'm willing to bet that you've never actually used 4chan
1 Wowbagger1 2017-07-31
False. Who else do you think is bogpilling people?
1 LE_UNITED_SUCKS 2017-07-31
Can I get a quick rundown?
1 grungebot5000 2017-07-31
No
1 CulturalMarxist69 2017-07-31
Sounds exactly like what some slowbrain on 4chan would say.
Some of us actually remember when the pool had aids. Now it's the entire forum.
1 LE_UNITED_SUCKS 2017-07-31
I used to love 4chan, but the entire site is just an extension of pol and b at this point. The turning point was when the site started taking itself seriously.
1 F00dbAby 2017-07-31
Are people still scared of communism in America
1 STLReddit 2017-07-31
Yep, but they know Communism is dead so now it's anything that remotely sounds like communism. Socialism has an ism at the end as well, so it's the new fad to hate.
1 geek_loser 2017-07-31
It's not 50 it's about 5 Million estimated.
1 BeMoreAmerica 2017-07-31
I'm pretty sure they mean subreddits that regularly post ShareBlue links. It's the Brietbart of the left doncha know?
1 UnverifiedAllegation 2017-07-31
sure. feel free to treat share blue like liberals treat breitbart, infowars and all the shitty "ROGUE" right wing news sources that are constantly plastered on this sub. It definitely has a slant and a perspective it wants to get there.
A cynical mind can get stories on either one of those sides of the spectrum that arent being covered by the other. they serve a purpose, though minor, and id really advise against using any one of those sites solely or even mostly
1 BeMoreAmerica 2017-07-31
No, you don't understand. David Brock literally said he wants ShareBlue to be the Breitbart of the left.
1 KillerK0ala 2017-07-31
so we're going to pretend that the 200+ anti trump subs that make it to the top of the front page individually with 500 subscribers and the baffling levels of astroturfing that happens in politics (remember, a civil and neutral forum to discuss all relevant politics) is completely organic? right...
it is exaggerated, same as the "Russian trolls paid to share conservative propaganda on reddit" but it's pretty blatantly true in some places on this website.
1 UnverifiedAllegation 2017-07-31
im sure theres some influence, but i really think its overstated
most young people posting actively on the internet are liberal, and trump is pretty goddamn unpopular, so its not exactly shocking. its like saying the kitten lobby is astroturfing the front page with cute pictures to push the feline agenda. actually most people like kitties
1 TokyoVardy 2017-07-31
name a liberal sub that isnt infiltrated by sjws
1 UnverifiedAllegation 2017-07-31
name a sub that isnt infiltrated is the question you should be asking
shareblue/ctr has become a right wing talking point, yet they never mention cambridge analytica or their "friends" over at 55 savushkina st (friends in quotes because the second that right wingers dont line up with russian interests they will turn on you)
1 TokyoVardy 2017-07-31
there are some centrist subs that arent infiltrated by agenda pushers, eg, KiA
1 UnverifiedAllegation 2017-07-31
what sub is that
1 TokyoVardy 2017-07-31
ok 1 month old accont
1 UnverifiedAllegation 2017-07-31
hardhitting, quality investigative work youre doing there, kid! youre just the kind of kid to keep a watchful eye on ethics in videogame journalism!
1 arcticfox23 2017-07-31
You must be new to this sub. If you go into any /r/conspiracy sub looking for proof, you're gonna have a bad time.
1 Murtank 2017-07-31
How was he on kennedys medical detail at 16 years old?
1 037_Engineering 2017-07-31
I saw "campaigned for Kennedy".
1 Murtank 2017-07-31
https://www.reddit.com/r/worldnews/comments/6qn7mi/we_regret_to_inform_you_that_one_of_our_beloved/dkyk12g/?utm_content=permalink&utm_medium=front&utm_source=reddit&utm_name=worldnews
Says medical detail
1 AutoModerator 2017-07-31
While not required, you are requested to use the NP (No Participation) domain of reddit when crossposting. This helps to protect both your account, and the accounts of other users, from administrative shadowbans. The NP domain can be accessed by replacing the "www" in your reddit link with "np".
I am a bot, and this action was performed automatically. Please contact the moderators of this subreddit if you have any questions or concerns.
1 037_Engineering 2017-07-31
Ah, in the OP it says campaign. The obit is probably better.
1 kit8642 2017-07-31
He was born in 1946, Kennedy died in 63'... HUH
1 CaptainApollyon 2017-07-31
we didn't used to have this self imposed arrested development.
1 Bernie_beat_Trump 2017-07-31
This guy was the driving force behind the exclusion of reasonable points of view from worldnews. His censorship is repugnant and I'd spit on his grave.
1 outtanutmeds 2017-07-31
He was ban happy. If you disagreed with Israeli policy he'd ban you.
1 Mike_McDermott 2017-07-31
was he jewish?
1 Grarglejobber 2017-07-31
You guys this was three legit users commenting in a row without a shill inbetween. NEW RECORD 2017!! :D
1 Mike_McDermott 2017-07-31
Hey, pal, are you calling me a legit user? I resent that remark!
1 Grarglejobber 2017-07-31
No, not at all. Sorry to have offended! I intended to suggest the opposite.
1 Grarglejobber 2017-07-31
Why?
1 Mike_McDermott 2017-07-31
Its just a joke. I am a frequent flyer here, but I dont think I post anything of importance.
1 Grarglejobber 2017-07-31
Hey, a voice of reason is a voice of reason :)
1 Mike_McDermott 2017-07-31
well thank you :)
1 EagleOfAmerica 2017-07-31
Lots of Zionists aren't Jewish. And lots of Jews aren't Zionist.
1 TheDutchRudder83 2017-07-31
Tired of having to explain this to people. Refreshing to hear it from someone else, anywhere.
1 not---a---bot 2017-07-31
You don't have to be a zionist or jewish to be one of the Christian wackjobs that believe not only in an upcoming armageddon, but that they need to actively work to bring it about.
1 sersers 2017-07-31
Weird, I've been banned in worldnews a ton of times for anti-Israel views but I never had any interactions with that specific mod.
1 Bedo8466 2017-07-31
Are you admitting to making multiple accounts to subvert a ban?
1 walksonground 2017-07-31
No you wouldn't.
/r/iamverybadass
1 Grarglejobber 2017-07-31
Let's take a trip. I'll let you take the pictures. If the mood strikes, I may just move from bodily fluids on his grave, to bodily solids.
1 walksonground 2017-07-31
/r/iamveryverybadass
If you want to document your crime, I'd be happy to help out and deliver the evidence to the appropriate law enforcement agency. But of course this all academic because you're just a phony internet tough guy. A paper tiger.
Alabama Code Title 13A. Criminal Code § 13A-7-23.1 :
(a) Any person who willfully or maliciously injures, defaces, removes, or destroys any tomb, monument, gravestone, burial mound, earthen or shell monument containing human skeletal remains or associated burial artifacts, or other structure or thing placed or designed for a memorial of the dead, or any fence, railing, curb, or any enclosure for the protection or ornamentation of any tomb, monument, gravestone, burial mound, earthen or shell monument containing human skeletal remains or associated burial artifacts, or other structure before mentioned, or for any enclosure for the burial of the dead, or any person who willfully and wrongfully or maliciously destroys, removes, cuts, breaks, or injures any tree, shrub, plant, flower, decoration, or other real or personal property within any cemetery or graveyard shall be guilty of a Class A misdemeanor.
(b) Any person who willfully or maliciously desecrates, injures, defaces, removes, or destroys any tomb, monument, structure, or container of human remains, burial mound, earthen or shell monument containing human skeletal remains or associated burial artifacts, and invades or mutilates the human corpse or remains shall be guilty of a Class C felony and upon conviction the person shall be punished as provided by law .
1 Grarglejobber 2017-07-31
hahahahahahahaha oh man plz, stop, my sides. I can't take all the delicious writhing..
1 walksonground 2017-07-31
hahahahhahahahaha okay great chat you're fun i bet you're well-liked irl
1 Grarglejobber 2017-07-31
I do alright :)
1 DeathMetalDeath 2017-07-31
f
1 whyarentwethereyet 2017-07-31
You are a disgusting human being.
1 Jesus-H-Christopher 2017-07-31
It's a fucking website. Get a life.
1 LeeHaarvey 2017-07-31
He was 18 when Kennedy died. He might have just been there for the last few months.
1 lucycohen 2017-07-31
So many of these people are in air force bases
1 EmSeaSquared 2017-07-31
Given how many of the mods of this sub are mods over at The_Fuckface it's amusing to see them crying about censorship. Most of you run and or participate in the most heavily censored subreddit on the entire site.
1 Murtank 2017-07-31
Whataboutism
1 EmSeaSquared 2017-07-31
How is saying "I find x amusing" whataboutism? Pointing out the massive hypocrisy at play here isn't whataboutism either.
1 shitINtheCANDYdish 2017-07-31
Don't play dumb. You know the difference between a self professed circle jerk and an ostensible clearing house for news.
1 Belmont_Trevor 2017-07-31
playing dumb is their last tactic left
1 cantsmokeme 2017-07-31
T_D influence seems to only show in controversial posts, or in the height of something big. (Pizzagate, Newtown/Orlando shootings, etc.)
1 Flytape 2017-07-31
Zero?
We share zero mods.
1 BurninEpix 2017-07-31
When I saw the post in world news about a mod dying, I'm not going to lie. My split-second Second reaction was "GOOD".
After that knee-jerk emotional response my humanity kicked back in, but it's like the same thing with John McCain, bad people are bad people and if they die.... Well let's just say worse things in the world could and do happen all the time and those other topics are way more worth crying and shedding a tear over. I would say this sure as hell isn't worth anybody's time grieving about. I'm not saying people should be vile and celebrate it either, but let's put things in perspective people.
1 True_Jack_Falstaff 2017-07-31
You're fucked in the head if you celebrate the death of a person just because you believe he was deleting reddit posts.
1 Afrobean 2017-07-31
lol you literally didn't even read their comment
1 True_Jack_Falstaff 2017-07-31
I did.
He then goes on to say that maybe we shouldn't celebrate his death, but we also shouldn't grieve over it.
Because he was a reddit moderator.
1 Belmont_Trevor 2017-07-31
if they sell out they deserve to die.
1 lluvli 2017-07-31
I don't know why this is being downvoted.
1 NotUrTokenBlackWoman 2017-07-31
This is messy /r/conspiracy .
1 LonelySpaceWizard 2017-07-31
TIL: /r/conspiracy is full of really poor human beings that have the emotional range of an angry teenage.
Congrats, you make my faith in humanity sink even lower.
1 NONAMEBLANKFACE 2017-07-31
and yet, here you are...
1 FuckYouTheConspiracy 2017-07-31
And you too. Really makes you think...
1 NONAMEBLANKFACE 2017-07-31
I like that you took this account out of retirement just for me. 😇
1 Katayani108 2017-07-31
Or maybe it's full of investigative journalists who explore connections and links before making assumptions.
1 LonelySpaceWizard 2017-07-31
What does that have to do with being insulting and immature? Someone just died and you're worrying about up-votes more than common decency.
1 Wowbagger1 2017-07-31
Bumbles into a pizza restaurant and stutters about "the b-b-basement" then hipfires and gets arrested.
Quality investigative journalism. Unless you mean the time this sub all thought a kindergarten was a covert hideout.
1 RocketSurgeon22 2017-07-31
HA! What a fucking idiot. Quote of the day.
1 Wowbagger1 2017-07-31
This place has many people who think Sandy Hook was a hoax. You shouldn't be surprised any longer.
1 DeathMetalDeath 2017-07-31
and 911, and jfk. I mean pfff c'mon guys official stories are always right.
1 dawkholiday 2017-07-31
didnt used to be until the election. there was a time when this place was actually enjoyable to pull up
1 KillerK0ala 2017-07-31
if anything i miss the Bush Obama years here for that. Trump/Clinton race really changed reddit as a whole. way more vile now.
1 varikonniemi 2017-07-31
Most probably the death is a diversion and he continues under a different name because the heat got to be too much.
1 UnverifiedAllegation 2017-07-31
i hope when you die people say this about you, and maybe theyll call your loved ones and give them the whole sandy hook "crisis actors" treatment.
1 varikonniemi 2017-07-31
Good. Let the hate transform you.
1 ghettobx 2017-07-31
Nothing hateful about it, just calling out a ridiculous theory for what it is.
1 varikonniemi 2017-07-31
What is ridiculous is that you believe in the narrative with zero evidence.
1 UnverifiedAllegation 2017-07-31
whats ridiculous is assuming when somebody dies they faked it in order to, lmao, dodge reddit heat
1 varikonniemi 2017-07-31
Whats ridiculous is assuming someone died. Got any proof?
1 UnverifiedAllegation 2017-07-31
are we talking about the clinton body count or what
1 Belmont_Trevor 2017-07-31
good point
1 lucycohen 2017-07-31
Top Minds are linking here now, sending in their people
https://np.reddit.com/r/TopMindsOfReddit/comments/6qpknm/altrighters_in_rconspiracy_celebrate_the_death_of/
1 Symbiotx 2017-07-31
That means they need to remove the thread right?
1 JoePesciOfGoneFishin 2017-07-31
So your proof is:
Something from 4chan where everything is made up
He was active on "Share Blue" subs even though you've got no proof of ShareBlue working on Reddit or on those subs. But they talk about liberal things and you don't like that, so that's good enough for you.
This is incredibly weak. Embarrassingly weak.
1 UnverifiedAllegation 2017-07-31
ugh i fell for this. I thought there was a literal shareblue sub, he just meant liberal subs? fuck off partisan.
Take a look at the mercers and their social media budgets
1 NONAMEBLANKFACE 2017-07-31
so robert mercer hires shills?
1 porkpoppet 2017-07-31
Just more hypnotoadies pushing the hive-mind of the month.
1 True_Jack_Falstaff 2017-07-31
Leave it to /r/conspiracy to attempt to smear and defame a recently dead guy for no reason other than "but muhh liburals!!!"
1 EarnestNoMeta 2017-07-31
Your whinging is obnoxious. Grow the fuck up.
1 Belmont_Trevor 2017-07-31
yup if they are playing damage control here, that proves it to me. you guys shoulda just stayed silent.
1 Flytape 2017-07-31
Rule 10, removed.
Only warning you'll get.
1 True_Jack_Falstaff 2017-07-31
My comment crossed the line, but you're okay with OP and others directing users on how to obtain dox on mods they are politically opposed to?
1 Flytape 2017-07-31
nothing past this point is important.
1 True_Jack_Falstaff 2017-07-31
Wow. You guys banned CNN for what they did, but you're fine with enabling people to find alleged dox on mods.
1 Flytape 2017-07-31
worldnews posted all this information on their sub, its a stickied post.
You're done here.
1 radishman5000 2017-07-31
You're the one that needs to be done here. You're more biased than the imaginary bias that this doxxing post is accusing someone else. I love that you're always downvoted though. Have fun being a giant hypocrite on a power trip who bans people who disagree but not those who blatantly call for doxxing, I'm sure that's really making the world a better place. It at least gives me hope that every time I see your dumbass pop up in a thread you're downvoted to oblivion.
1 javi404 2017-07-31
His name was posted by mods in world news. Ots public information. The doxing that happened to CTR was done on 4chan. That list had this guys name in it.
1 mastigia 2017-07-31
At least he is honest about his bias. Like him or hate him, you know what he is. I respect that.
1 CulturalMarxist69 2017-07-31
Why are so many of the mods here openly bias? That's not how conspiracy users typically act, and they are the majority here.
1 mastigia 2017-07-31
This may be the most ridiculous comment I've read all week. You get a gold star.
1 CulturalMarxist69 2017-07-31
I'm sorry, what? I asked a question, not to be antagonized.
1 mastigia 2017-07-31
I'm not antagonizing you about your describing our users as non-partisan mr. CulturalMarxist69 :)
At least they haven't been since this new crop of users started showing up about 8 months ago, that coincidentally all just want to argue partisan viewpoints and pick fights.
1 CulturalMarxist69 2017-07-31
You were being antagonizing.
Are you talking about T_D? They showed hard about a year ago, and now we get lovely crossposts from them all the time. Somehow, it gets voted higher than other stuff on the sub. Coincidence, I'm sure.
There's two reasons there are so many new accounts here. 1) The mods banned most of the long term users (3 years +) who go against the narrative. They continue to be ban happy, and users make multiple accounts. 2) Sockpuppets. People here obviously use them.
This is not just happening here, but on every conspiracy site on the web. Strange.
1 Flytape 2017-07-31
Yep, and trust me when I say that actual /Conspiracy users rarely to never (mostly never) buy gold from Reddit to pad their egos.
This sub helps make the world a better place, for example look at Hillary Clinton's failed campaign. Nobody trusted her ass because of the wonderful people who continuously highlight the shit person she is, people that participate here and elsewhere all over the internet. People who don't believe the bullshit the MSM rambles about 24 hours a day. Ahem, people who aren't buying gold to feel more correct than others.
Nobody doxxed shit in this thread, enjoy your damage control brigades.
Because it's obvious as fuck and the reason you had to add that disclaimer to your comment.
1 CulturalMarxist69 2017-07-31
I have. On multiple accounts, multiple times. Including my account that was banned here. And I do it because sometimes these people have the best comments in the thread, and are downvoted by an obvious bridgade, which is almost always right-wingers.
Lots of people feel the way he does. Sorry.
1 scotty_rotten 2017-07-31
Tell us, on the mannequin, where did radishman5000 rip you a new a-hole?
1 equality2000 2017-07-31
Salty, snowflake?
1 genji_of_weed 2017-07-31
nothing is as weak as what you chose to do with your life
1 Aerik 2017-07-31
that's this whole subreddit
1 NONAMEBLANKFACE 2017-07-31
whats the deal with the lefty-righty retards in this thread? is there really two pools of braindead shills going at it here?
1 Mike_McDermott 2017-07-31
yes.
1 BigPharmaSucks 2017-07-31
Dude, it's been like this all year, driving me fucking mad.
1 JackalOfSpades 2017-07-31
So could you call that a...
DEAD-POOL ???
1 weeglos 2017-07-31
Can't tell if you're asking about /r/conspiracy , Reddit as a whole, the entirety of the USA or the world at large.
1 SteampunkElephantGuy 2017-07-31
"everyone who doesnt have my opinion is a shill"
1 WhiteyNiteNite 2017-07-31
Wait what is the conspiracy here?
1 ghettobx 2017-07-31
Be careful -- that question is causing some here to get their panties in a wad.
1 KillerK0ala 2017-07-31
i thought the conspiracy was that he was a mod who often removed articles that look bad for the lefts agenda, while under pay roll at a leftist politically charged company? (i don't know what to refer to Shareblue as, wouldn't want to say Propaganda but pretty much that).
Could be seen as companies paying reddit to place favorable mods at the largest formerly default communities to filter what is submitted/makes the top by their likings? is that not the obvious conspiracy OP is implying?
1 heefledger 2017-07-31
He was a liberal. That doesn't seem fishy to you?????
1 DeathMetalDeath 2017-07-31
yeah you'd think everyone knows certain subs are completely modded by a liberal political advocacy firm. But they dont so this comes as a surprise to some.
1 Mike_McDermott 2017-07-31
This thread is going to be a blast!
BRB, I have to refill my popcorn.
1 RecoveringGrace 2017-07-31
TMoR has already started the push to get it to all.
1 Wesley_Snides 2017-07-31
attacking the character of a dead man, well done everyone, a new low.
1 seeking101 2017-07-31
i know right, lets all stop with the hitler references...oh wait
1 Katayani108 2017-07-31
Interesting find.
1 Blomkampf 2017-07-31
Wouldn't somebody with such an obvious political agenda be the exact opposite kind of person than you'd want moderating /r/worldnews ?
1 FnordFinder 2017-07-31
Most decent people don't let their bias interfere with their ability to be reasonable.
There is something to be said about the people who can't understand that.
1 Blomkampf 2017-07-31
You're lying to yourself if you believe that - especially when discussing political radicals - especially those on the political left (who are prodded by a sympathetic media/entertainment industry/education system.)
1 DeathMetalDeath 2017-07-31
True, but naive to think most people are decent who are becoming mods in certain subreddits.
1 KillerK0ala 2017-07-31
not on reddit they don't
1 rivershimmer 2017-07-31
Most people without opinions on world news would not be interested in moderating a sub about world news.
1 Blomkampf 2017-07-31
And ironically would also make the best mods.
1 rivershimmer 2017-07-31
No, they wouldn't, for since they have no interest in world news, they wouldn't be able to force themselves to spend their free time reading about world news.
1 seeking101 2017-07-31
yes they would. thier job is to make sure rules arent broken. thier job has nothing to do with actual worldnews at all - just to keep the rules from being broken
1 rivershimmer 2017-07-31
It's not a job. It's an unpaid hobby. And no one chooses subjects in which they have no interest for their hobby.
1 seeking101 2017-07-31
you know wtf im saying
Agreed, but an ethical person would put biases aside... According to many here he did not do that....hence a nonpartisan would be a better choice for mod
1 Fat_Dumb_American 2017-07-31
#TrumpBodyCount
1 RocketSurgeon22 2017-07-31
I don't like this post at all. Can you share evidence that supports your theory of his censorship efforts? What does his death have to do with anything?
1 NationalDenbt 2017-07-31
The obituary post on r/worldnews is essentially a dox since it reveals his name, location ect. A while ago 4chan doxxed CTR and apparently the details given through the r/worldnews post match the details of a CTR employee from the dox, meaning he was manipulating the subreddit for CTR this whole time.
Of course, there's nothing linked to match the two together because linking to a dox would violate Reddit rules, so you're going to have to look that up yourself.
1 RocketSurgeon22 2017-07-31
Ah thank you for the clarity. Makes sense and this post should stay.
1 ENDLESSBLOCKADEZ 2017-07-31
Lol there is so much push back in this sub. So much defense.
1 FnordFinder 2017-07-31
Making a thread to celebrate and slander the death of a person because you don't like their politics is about as tasteless and classless as you can be.
1 seeking101 2017-07-31
that's not whats going on though
1 FnordFinder 2017-07-31
Yes it is.
1 ENDLESSBLOCKADEZ 2017-07-31
You realize you're in a fucking conspiracy sub Reddit right?
1 ENDLESSBLOCKADEZ 2017-07-31
You realize you're in a fucking conspiracy sub Reddit right?
1 FnordFinder 2017-07-31
You realize that has nothing to do with anything I said.
1 Weezull- 2017-07-31
I was wondering why they made a thread for him as if the average user would give a fuck. Especially if he was probably a typical worldnews mod censorship faggot. Makes sense now that they made the thread to drum up sympathy for him amidst the fact that news like this would inevitably come up against him in the wake of his death.
1 lluvli 2017-07-31
Good riddance!
1 Kim_Joong_Il 2017-07-31
Run over by a truck on the one year anniversary of the Nice truck attack, an event he heavily censored on /r/worldnews . Coincidence?
1 AutoModerator 2017-07-31
While not required, you are requested to use the NP (No Participation) domain of reddit when crossposting. This helps to protect both your account, and the accounts of other users, from administrative shadowbans. The NP domain can be accessed by replacing the "www" in your reddit link with "np".
I am a bot, and this action was performed automatically. Please contact the moderators of this subreddit if you have any questions or concerns.
1 MissType 2017-07-31
Karma's a bitch.
1 Kim_Joong_Il 2017-07-31
This is /r/conspiracy . It could also be conspiracy to commit, and commission of, murder in the first degree. I think that's a capital offense in Alabama.
1 DeathMetalDeath 2017-07-31
synchronicity is a hell of a thing.
1 Vaginal_Warts_ 2017-07-31
So, /r/conspiracy is just calling things coinky-dinkies now and not looking for a conspiracy?
1 kartana 2017-07-31
Respawned with a different name probably.
1 QandA_120 2017-07-31
So we like doxxing now?
Hard to keep track cuz when CNN did it, it was literally murderrape but apparently now it's perfectly condonable
1 lluvli 2017-07-31
CNN was fake news and deserved to be banned.
1 QandA_120 2017-07-31
It's not anymore fake than any of the other news sites and stations
1 KillerK0ala 2017-07-31
this is true, however i feel like the "You are not allowed to read Wikileaks; we are allowed to read it and tell you if it is true or important but only because we're reporters." pushed a lot of people against CNN around conspiracy boards anyway.
1 BewareTheDawg 2017-07-31
Since apparently half the commenters here are too fucking stupid to understand this post and are asking "Whats the conspiracy?" Ill explain what this guy is alledging
/pol/ doxxed the shit out of all the CTR employees back during election season. Huge list of names. Anyway OP is alledging the dead WorldNews mods name was one that was doxxed, meaning that a prominent reddit mod was literally employed by David Brocks astroturfing Super PAC.
Judging from the response this has drawn from the "Top Minds of Reddit/SRD/Type of person that would mod on here" crowd, theres probably something to it.
1 Ieuan1996 2017-07-31
Thank you for this comment
1 brain_on_drugs 2017-07-31
If the allegations are made without proof, isn't it just a lie?
1 DeathMetalDeath 2017-07-31
great logic on r/conspiracy, username checks out
1 NationalDenbt 2017-07-31
You'd have to find the proof yourself since posting it would break site wide rules.
1 louixiii 2017-07-31
Nope, its a scientific theory
1 JackalOfSpades 2017-07-31
How can mirrors be real if our eyes aren't real?
1 BewareTheDawg 2017-07-31
Do you even English?
al·le·ga·tion ˌaləˈɡāSH(ə)n/ noun plural noun: allegations a claim or assertion that someone has done something illegal or wrong, typically one made without proof.
1 brain_on_drugs 2017-07-31
Seems like a very convenient excuse to be able to make shit up about someone who died and can't defend themselves.
"It's not a lie, they're allegations. Proof? Can't show it"
Riiiight
1 BewareTheDawg 2017-07-31
I mean there is proof its just against site rules to link to it.
I'm not getting banned just to win an argument against you lol
1 wanking_furiously 2017-07-31
That is really faulty logic.
1 daft_crunk1942 2017-07-31
If anybody criticizes us, we must be right.
1 ___jamil___ 2017-07-31
it's classic /r/conspiracy thinking. "if you don't have anything to hide, why won't you let me strip you bare, while telling me all of your secrets?!?"
1 Ikantbeliveit 2017-07-31
Except when it comes to the FBI investigation of Trump and assoc. Then its 'He doesn't have to say anything, he is the POTUS'
1 Bob_McTroll 2017-07-31
Was that the one with the payrolls and all very similarly priced payments?
1 BewareTheDawg 2017-07-31
Yep. There were multiple doxxes of CTR/Shareblue people. Since CTR and now American Bridge are super pacs they have to make their expenditures public, and /pol/ found it and doxxed all the people on the list.
1 Bob_McTroll 2017-07-31
That's not really what doxxing is. It's more like harassment.
1 BewareTheDawg 2017-07-31
Well they took the names from the list then did research and posted their full names, addresses, phone numbers, social media etc.
It was a pretty textbook dox imo.
1 Bob_McTroll 2017-07-31
Info was public though. Thought doxxing was about unmasking a person's private info.
1 Mike_McDermott 2017-07-31
How much does a "PowerMod" earn for being a "PowerMod"?
If there is no money in it, can one of the top minds tell me what the incentive is for being a "PowerMod" then? Fame? Glory? Pussy?
1 xXIronSausageXx 2017-07-31
Pussy. Powermods are knee deep in pussy 24/7.
1 Mike_McDermott 2017-07-31
thats some loose pussy if they can go knee deep.
1 KillerK0ala 2017-07-31
for all we know there could be money in it.
think about it. if you're a publisher or an activist or a politician or even an HR person in a large company, wouldn't you pay some cash to have one of "your people" in some of the largest forums/communities on the entire internet? reddit gets millions and millions of views across its entirety every day.
i'm not saying it's a sure thing, but it's something i'd want if i was in a position to want one. Because of that it leads me to believe others have wanted one too, and could have tried to make an offer.
1 Vaginal_Warts_ 2017-07-31
Is there anything illegal about a mod "selling out", so to speak, or profiting from their position? I would have thought that /r/The_Donald users would admire that kind of entrepreneurship.
1 KillerK0ala 2017-07-31
bro, i just said i'd want one lol i kind of am admiring it.
definitely not illegal. but kind of unethical if you selectively remove what your company/boss wants you to. Also pretty badass, you're like the lamest kind of secret agent. but still a secret agent.
1 Vaginal_Warts_ 2017-07-31
I wasn't talking about you specifically, just that quite a few T_D people really seem to dislike him. I didn't even know you were one.
1 KillerK0ala 2017-07-31
not often do i comment, but i have. probably one of the funnier subreddits i browse. i come to this website to be amused.
1 Mike_McDermott 2017-07-31
This is an avenue that needs to be investigated and really, reddit should practice full disclosure and make people aware that "PowerMods" are being paid and who they are being paid by .
Surely Reddit would not mind transparency and full disclosure because surely Reddit has nothing to hide right?
1 KillerK0ala 2017-07-31
reddit is far too open and honest to ever do something like that.
1 el_chino 2017-07-31
Acces to fag kingdom
1 Mike_McDermott 2017-07-31
so all the mangina a guy can have?
1 TokyoVardy 2017-07-31
When i saw announcement, i was hoping it was maxwellhill
1 3chordsandthetruth 2017-07-31
His children took his wife's last name and his son's took their wives last names? This guy and his spawn are the definition of cucks
1 nyx_on 2017-07-31
We owe nothing to the dead but the truth, it's the living who deserve compassion.
1 sandvich 2017-07-31
This guy was Filth. Fuck em.
1 lluvli 2017-07-31
Fuck TMoR.
1 The_Hanging_Judge 2017-07-31
fuck that cunt
1 Murtank 2017-07-31
This thread has been brigaded to death
1 Tarrock 2017-07-31
This thread is stuffed full of r/politics regulars.
1 VedalkenTinkerer 2017-07-31
No surprises here, worldnews is so ban heavy whenever anything goes against their views.
1 saintcmb 2017-07-31
don tell me what to do, or assume Im immature because I think its tacky to talk shit about people that just died. Im grown, that is why I understand it isn't cool or edgy to be disrespectful.
1 Murtank 2017-07-31
I think i have my answer but in case im wrong... you dont see how your comment that implies you are an impartial non-leftist might be troublesome if you are a leftist? Especially as i was addressing leftists...
1 Murtank 2017-07-31
Are you denying he was a powermod? rainbow push partner? ACLU member? progressive activist?
1 EarnestNoMeta 2017-07-31
😭😭😭
1 Tall_Trombone_Guy 2017-07-31
Oh yes, all the users from r/eve I'm sure followed me. Don't be so condescending next time and maybe you too will get some upvotes.
1 UnverifiedAllegation 2017-07-31
whats ridiculous is assuming when somebody dies they faked it in order to, lmao, dodge reddit heat
1 Belmont_Trevor 2017-07-31
didn't convince me since it's not doxxing.
1 qaqa1 2017-07-31
Who?
1 lluvli 2017-07-31
Damn he's as ugly as you could expect! It's not surprising he was a /r/Liberal mod and /r/politics poster. Hahaha.
1 Mike_McDermott 2017-07-31
yes.
1 DeathMetalDeath 2017-07-31
agreed they should have not covered the NICE terror attack. He did us a service.
1 BigPharmaSucks 2017-07-31
Dude, it's been like this all year, driving me fucking mad.
1 Vaginal_Warts_ 2017-07-31
Is there anything illegal about a mod "selling out", so to speak, or profiting from their position? I would have thought that /r/The_Donald users would admire that kind of entrepreneurship.
1 Mike_McDermott 2017-07-31
This is an avenue that needs to be investigated and really, reddit should practice full disclosure and make people aware that "PowerMods" are being paid and who they are being paid by .
Surely Reddit would not mind transparency and full disclosure because surely Reddit has nothing to hide right?
1 JackalOfSpades 2017-07-31
So could you call that a...
DEAD-POOL ???
1 weeglos 2017-07-31
Can't tell if you're asking about /r/conspiracy , Reddit as a whole, the entirety of the USA or the world at large.
1 NONAMEBLANKFACE 2017-07-31
I like that you took this account out of retirement just for me. 😇
1 Mike_McDermott 2017-07-31
so all the mangina a guy can have?
1 SteampunkElephantGuy 2017-07-31
"everyone who doesnt have my opinion is a shill"
1 BewareTheDawg 2017-07-31
I mean there is proof its just against site rules to link to it.
I'm not getting banned just to win an argument against you lol
1 seeking101 2017-07-31
i know right, lets all stop with the hitler references...oh wait
1 FnordFinder 2017-07-31
Yes it is.
1 FnordFinder 2017-07-31
"Progressives" as a term is used for liberals. It's even in the definition of the word.
http://www.dictionary.com/browse/progressive?s=t
I'll specifically quote a couple:
And another:
1 Bedo8466 2017-07-31
Are you admitting to making multiple accounts to subvert a ban?
1 ENDLESSBLOCKADEZ 2017-07-31
You realize you're in a fucking conspiracy sub Reddit right?
1 FnordFinder 2017-07-31
You realize that has nothing to do with anything I said.