Do Flat Earth or Arctic Illuminati Grannies go through this persecution? I think not!

Kek.

I have a psychic connection to the mods in r politics

They're trying hard to legitimize this character, who advocates war with Iran for Israels benefit.

Who advocates war witb Iran?? Definitely not Q... Nuclear disarmament talks just like NK is what is foreshadowed.

Reddit banning Q subs is a legitimization attempt? Lol.

Because Q is actually who they say they are.

It may be a LARP but the people involved are real and are sharing theories and information. This is what they are afraid of. There is some truth here mixed in with some of the flourishes. Q predicted North Korea and Saudi Arabia.

No he didn’t. Omg. If you are even a smidgen aware of global politics, you’d have seen this one coming from miles away.

That’s the thing with Q followers—y’all stretch the truth to fit your agenda. What about the fact that Q(Pamphlet at the time) said that Hillary and McCain would be in Cuba by the end of last year? You remember the “war” in DC last December that Q talked about one night? That never happened. There’s some many things that anyone can point to and say that he was wrong....but the Q group is too smart for that. Q openly said he’d lie to you. And everyone kept worshipping this guy.

This is the third iteration of Q. Follow that breadcrumb.

Yes he did. He talked about North Korean peace months before the Singapore summit. He talked about the Saudis right before their purge.

And so did the news. My god, you’d think Qultists just found out that we’ve been doing diplomatic meetings since the beginning of our country. Do y’all not pay attention to the news, or do you let Q(Pamphlet) just give you it?

No he did not predict them.

Doesn't Q also say to "trust sessions" and claims Donald "epstein is a terrific guy" Trump is taking down deep state pedos?

​

Comes off as a psyop to me.

He has only gently alluded to pedo stuff. Never been blatant on that subject, even when pressed. Likely alot of these types of crimes may never be known to the public.

There’s good reason to trust sessions, his confirmation vote was split down party lines, and dems fought like hell to try to keep him out. RR on the other hand was approved unanimously.

Check out the number of human trafficking arrests under Trumps presidency compared to Obama, Bush, or Clinton. Sessions and Trump are both hard at work.

What does the vote being along party lines have to do with trusting sessions?

It doesn't. But they're desperate

the real reason they want to trust sessions is because the main part of the q movement is to never question Trump on anything.

So questioning someone that he appointed and didn fired means questioning Trump. And they can't do that

Q = MIlitary Indusrial complex Mouthpiece

Q's admission is only worth anything if Q is real.

Otherwise, it sounds like Q is telling you what you want to hear.

I have seen nothing to confirm Q -- it's always just this vague, pseudo-spy nonsense that is so incredibly badly done.

If it's so obvious, what should I be looking for?

Yeah, I've read the drops. I remain utterly unconvinced. Some of the gimmicks used are just awful.

You said it's obvious: so, what's the most obvious proof?

The airforce one photo was confirmed to be photoshopped and then q responded to that saying he was just trolling. What does that prove?

the 1776 was also possible photoshopped but didn't prove anything in the first place.

Are you actually bringing up the AF1 photo that was proven to be from a news story a few years ago? Also the 1776 post like the other post that was supposed to be Trump signature was mostly covered. Why not just show it all? Because it's not Trump's signature.

Q asked "is the stage set??" When pressed about what is taking so long... the very next day at a press conference Trump said "For the past year we have been setting the stage" and as he said this he drew a Q with his hand.

The pic trump posted on twitter from airforce one with prince Alaweed arrest newspaper article on trumps desk. Him and 4 or 5 others holding their thumbs up in shape of a Q. Title of the image was "doitqj8aathanksq". This came after all the saudi arrests that q alluded to before they happened.

He post a military stringer with obviouus elements of "conf_green sky tt" contained. This was after a few days of alluding to the rothschilds being taken out. The next day there was a helicopter crash/collision with a small passenger plain over the ROTHSCHILD estate in UK. The pilot of the helicopter was mike GREEN. The co pilot was vietnamese military who's initals were TT. It was rumored the previous week in semi-mainstream outlets that Trump met in private with Putin and/or pm of Chins in Vietnam...

I could keep going if u are interested. I would hope that would be enough to make anybody's ears perk up though...

Here's a pretty reasonable test that can be conducted with any movement, philosophy, or intellectual field: show us two or three lines of evidence (ideally keystone papers, but let's not kid ourselves here) that are your strongest arguments for why you believe the thing you're talking about isn't complete garbage.

In your case, this would presumably mean the three most important "Q Proofs" that provide evidence for the why, what, and how of Q's message and importance.

No need for a gish gallop- just the best two or three. Think you can pull that off?

Q asked "is the stage set??" When pressed about what is taking so long... the very next day at a press conference Trump said "For the past year we have been setting the stage" and as he said this he drew a Q with his hand.

The pic trump posted on twitter from airforce one with prince Alaweed arrest newspaper article on trumps desk. Him and 4 or 5 others holding their thumbs up in shape of a Q. Title of the image was "doitqj8aathanksq". This came after all the saudi arrests that q alluded to before they happened.

He post a military stringer with obviouus elements of "conf_green sky tt" contained. This was after a few days of alluding to the rothschilds being taken out. The next day there was a helicopter crash/collision with a small passenger plain over the ROTHSCHILD estate in UK. The pilot of the helicopter was mike GREEN. The co pilot was vietnamese military who's initals were TT. It was rumored the previous week in semi-mainstream outlets that Trump met in private with Putin and/or pm of Chins in Vietnam...

Edit: shortly after Lynne forester de Rothschild retweeted a Stalin letter from WW2 that read "stop sending people to kill me or I will send someone and wont have to send a 2nd."

I could keep going if u are interested. I would hope that would be enough to make anybody's ears perk up though...

The "No name returnning to the headlines" a month before his official time of death, to the minute (off an hour due to DST), was pretty hard to dismiss.

Lol you’re lying. The image did not have the words “thanksq” anywhere in it. When you have to lie to make your case....

My bad it was owsq not thanks. Was an honest mistake buddy

An honest mistake that completely undercuts your argument.

Uhhh... how is the actual image title any less convincing?? Owes vs thanks? The other instances I gave? And you scrub it all because I miss quote the image title? This isnt a college thesis dude, Im freewilling it off the top of my head on the fly, from my phone... geeze.

Man, it was uploaded by pbs, not the Whitehouse. Is Q a pbs insider?

It was uploaded by Donald Trump on his Twitter page what are you talking about

I was joking, the twitter image host is pbs.

The whole thing is silly man. It doesn’t even say “owes” and it’s not even in the shape of a Q. It’s just ridiculous.

Sorry u feel that way, noticed you disregarded the other two examples, u obviously dont care to hear the countless others I could give since you have completely discounted it all.

Either way, many of us will be here to comfort you when the shtf. It is obvious what direction this administration is heading with everything that has unfolded this year.

Look for things to accelerate once the FISA docs are released. Its coming whether u think its crazy or not, and its about damn time. Your life and your descendants lives will be so much better because of it too.

No hard feelings, u arent the 1st or last person who thinks its all nonsense.

Q is fake fake fake. You're proofs are garbage and when shtf, you'll be left holding your dick.

Why so hostile? No hard feelings dude we can agree to disagree. Sound good?

No. When you talk down to me because you believe a larp, I have nothing else to say to you.

Also just gonna leave this right here....

https://media.8ch.net/file_store/2e9295608a0f995b01ac85dd8d5815411011d57b34281b5d206eef1745ece51b.png

Lol Trump makes and fixes typos once a week. This is literally nothing. You’re delusional.

If you have to look like Charlie searching for Pepe Silvia, to prove one thing that Q has said, your case probably isn't very strong.

As crazy as all of this sounds to you.... How do actually think it would pan out over the past months if it all were true? Trump come out and endorse him at a rally? Being a military op that is walking a tightrope of legality... Dont you think there would need to be some plausible deniability to protect themselves from potential future administrations?

Obviously there are many that have jumped aboard no questions asked via confirmation bias... on the other hand there are many that have rejected it at face value. I would think it best not to fall into either of those categories and investigate with am open mind.

Stake out Pamphlet anon when he's cashing his sweet sweet Q checks.

Honestly if you didnt experience it when each happened there isnt much you can do but go back and look at each one. Not going to have much of an effect on your opinion though now I would guess.

Well when asked if a plane hit the Pentagon he responded "Yes".... so there goes that theory

People were not happy with that response either...

Right now it is off limits. I have wondered if it is actually more complicated then we imagine. To discount Q based on 1 area he won‘t question is reaching. He tells people to think for themselves and use logic. That is Telling.

Discounting Q is definitely not the conclusion I was suggesting. He has gone as far as hinting at Merkel being Hitler's daughter but tows the establishment line on 9/11 it seems and geoengineering. It shows that this is a military operation with set parameters of disclosure... 9/11 disclosure does not appear to be in the cards. Also given that we have arguably become the worlds greatest oil producer and the obvious economic benefits that has it is not likely there will be any public oversight on the Geoengineering programs. It doesnt appear that a transition away from carbon based fuel sources is in the near future so the ops must continue for now.

My bad. For sure there are area's off limits. Not sure why as he has gone out there in general (e.g. Merkel - perhaps a message to her if true?) but I guess too far is too far. The geoengineering thing is for sure a big one. I noticed right after Trump won how chemtrails dropped off a cliff. I have seen them for years, thick where I am, and it was pretty much guaranteed to be daily. Why the change? I mean, clearly they didn't 100% stop. Look into Trump's family's past, in particular his uncle, who was responsible for going through Tesla's documents after his death in order to see if there was anything usable at the time. (Something like that.)

Yes I agree they definitely have gone down substantially.... I'll take what I can get I suppose.

If there's one thing that gives Q some credence, it's the way blue team is so desperately trying to silence Q.

Yea I don’t, get it. If he isn’t a threat why is he banned? This def gives, Q more credit.

It could still be some crazy psyop, as the major huge predictions haven’t happened but god damn does, it feel like they’re legit and coming soon.

We'll see.

How familiar are you with the term "disinformation"?

If you look at the techniques released to the public, Q is textbook nonsense. Whether its nonsense from an intelligence entity, or from a LARPing basement dweller, the narrative is clear and shoddily pushed

I’m familiar with it, and Q has even reminded people disinformation is necessary; which is concerning, but they’ve predicted too many things and connected a lot of dots. And there’s a weird amount of human trafficking and pedo busts lately so I not only believe q is real, and cares, about the, people.

So what’s their narrative?

Name one thing they predicted that wasn’t only obvious in hindsight.

North Korea’s strings being cut 3 months prior was a pretty, good one to me. Especially considering the news kept saying, how much, of a threat NK was.

But he didn’t predict anything? There was talk of a summit and then the summit happened. What’s the prediction?

He literally thanks Kim and says his strings have been cut. I’ll find the post, give me, a second.

What does strings cut mean? They are working on a deal, they’ve done this a dozen times in the last few decades. This is a political prediction and shows no sign of insider information.

You are, untitled yo your own opinion. I think it’s pretty, clear cut.

And sure they may have done that the last few decades, as you claim but also don’t provide any sources: but ask when has North Korea seemed so chill before, in the last few decades?

the narrative is clear and shoddily pushed

So is corporate media's narratives, but people aren't shitting bricks over it.

If there's one thing that gives hillary some credence it's the way red team is so desperately trying to silence her.

Oh, the red team definitely knows that Hillary is real and dangerous. So does the blue team. The only team that doesn't is the neoliberal/neocon corporate sponsored team.

Yea I don’t, get it. If he isn’t a threat why is he banned?

Q isn't a threat. The followers are. The Q subs frequently had comment sections full of posts wishing for violence against elected officials. They wouldn't even call McCain by name after he passed, although they maintain he was actually executed for treason. Q followers tend to be those already prone to radical, insular belief structures and those are easily radicalized.

What's bothersome to me is that Q is obviously counter propaganda to the ongoing Russian scandal. The Russian scandal has much more interesting information and evidence to discuss if this were an actual conspiracy sub. Instead the sub is swamped with Q nonsense and whacky supernatural/religious stuff. It's the same demographic spamming both and it's a demographic that's easily misled, tribalized, and radicalized. The fun conspiracy to discuss would be who is most likely to be behind something that has radicalized a non-negligible chunk of the US' permanent underclass and how does that figure in to the aggressive response by Reddit admin

There is a difference in calling for justice to be served and calling for violence.

Q also gave you the pedo details that made you call for justice to be served...don’t you understand the problem there?

Q doesn't make anyone do anything and no there is no problem here.

The fact that you're more concerned about people reading Q, than the people that are trafficking children is an interesting take on this thing.

Because Q is making up who is doing the trafficking. He is pointing you in all the wrong directions and you’re celebrating him for it.

Really?

Q is making up who is doing the trafficking?

Someone claiming to commit acts of violence in the name of Qanon or anything else, need to be investigated fully and evidence to back those claims have not been produced.

I'm just wondering why Laura Silsby was arrested at the Haiti/Dominican Republic and bailed out by Bill Clinton?

http://harvardhrj.com/wp-content/uploads/2009/09/King.pdf

http://archive.is/SNCUW

https://truthfeed.com/breaking-clinton-foundation-tied-to-convicted-child-trafficker-laura-silsby-media-silent/34146/

Why was Huma Abadein forwarding Hillary emails about Laura Silsby's organization dating back to 2001?

CNN reported that she had attempted to traffic children out of Haiti before.

http://archive.is/jyO1k

In an email written by Hillary on February 9th, 2010, she discussed with Counselor Cheryl Mills and other attorneys to exam the U.S. Government’s “options” concerning the arrested Americans.

https://www.wikileaks.org/clinton-emails/Clinton_Email_August_Release/C05769780.pdf

The New York Times stated on February 11th, Jorge Puello, Silsby’s original lawyer, was believed to be leading an international human trafficking ring which involved women and minors. The Harvard Human Rights Journal reported that he was eventually arrested concerning the ring.

The investigation was run by the U.S. Immigration and Customs Enforcement (ICE) and Homeland Security Investigations (HSI). Due to Puello’s trafficking network in Central Americans and Haitians, he was wanted in the United States, El Salvador, and Costa Rica.

http://archive.is/ph5w

So then you combine that with some of John Podesta's emails:

From: Luzzatto@aol.com To: podesta@ici.org , john.podesta@gmail.com Date: 2009-12-20 16:06 Subject: Fwd: Dupuytren’s Advance Info for John Podesta

Hoping this gets to you from my close friend and fellow-hand-sufferer, Patrick Schmidt. We had a Luzzattopalooza yesterday, with Marisa-Paul-10 month Evie staying with us already while their house gets painted, and Ben-Alex sledding their 3 over to “help” us decorate the tree. When the parents got back to retrieve children, they threw in the towel (and about 19 pieces of winter clothing) to stay for tortellini and an overnight. So, 6 grownups with 2 toddlers and 2 infants spread throughout the house, and sure enough one of those toddlers was rubbing my nose at 5:45……….

Then Tamera Luzzato telling John Podesta

"We plan to heat the pool, so a swim is a possibility. Bonnie will be > Uber Service to transport Ruby, Emerson, and Maeve Luzzatto (11, 9, and > almost 7) so you’ll have some further entertainment, and they will be in > that pool for sure."

https://wikileaks.org/podesta-emails/emailid/54545

Then you realize Luzzato had a website up, (now deleted) that stated:

"Evelyn  is growing up, soon she will be the Queen of the entire US of A, right  now, for a limited time only, you can spend some time with her online, raw and uncut. Take advantage of this now, as in the future she will have the power of life and death over you."

http://archive.is/JGhR6#selection-245.1-245.32

That's an interesting way to describe your step grandchildren.

What do you think?

There have been decades’ worth of documentaries and scattered reports about pedophilia and ritual abuse in elite circles. Corey Feldman, Elijah Wood, et. al discussing it in Hollywood, the “Boy’s Town“allegations in Nebraska outlined in the documentary Conspiracy of Silence, a Jerry Sandusky victim claiming Sandusky was only part of a much larger pedophile ring, rampant human trafficking an sex slavery in Saudi Arabia, a major US ally, through embassies and diplomatic centers in the US, a cover-up acknowledged in the mainstream media regarding pedophilia in the British Parliament, allegations Jimmy Savile was part of a larger Satanic child sex ring involving people in positions of power.

https://youtu.be/hubT6i30WDE

Then you realize that NXIVM is directly tied to the Clinton's:

“On March 14 and April 13, records show, more than a dozen contributions poured into Clinton’s coffers from NXIVM, an executive and group-awareness training organization led by Brooklyn-born Keith Raniere, 47. Most were from first-time political donors, each giving the $2,300 maximum. Three of the March and April Clinton pledges came from Raniere’s most high-profile followers: Seagram heiresses Clare and Sara Bronfman, and Pamela Cafritz, daughter of D.C. A-listers Buffy and Bill Cafritz. Hillary isn’t the only Clinton NXIVM officials are attracted to. At least three of them – group President Nancy Salzman and the Bronfman sisters – are members of Bill’s charitable organization, the Clinton Global Initiative. Membership is by invitation only and requires at least a $15,000 donation per person for one year.”

Below is a member list from the Clinton Global Initiative from 2007.

You will the recognize names, and it should chill you to the bone.

One name stands out:  Clare Bronfman. Clare was also a part of the NXIVM organization, and she financed the Raniere cult.

https://www.scribd.com/document/35046616/081-Clinton-s-Global-Initiative-2007-Members-include-ARK-Paul-Bernstein

The Bronfman sisters play a huge role in this story, as they both were associated with Raniere and NXIVM.

Further, this is where I want to bring in Libya, as the Bronfmans are involved in Libya, and do not forget who said, “We came, we saw, he died.”  Hillary Clinton will forever live in my mind with those words ringing loudly in my head. She wanted Libya, and she got Libya. Now sex slavery is rampant there, as war brings homeless children, and homeless children are prey for the sex/slave industry.

However, she plays a much larger role in Libya, as her husband is a new and rising leader there.  This is a huge and shocking story. Remember her sister, Clare sat on the board of the Clinton Global Initiative, and they were both members of the NXIVM organization.  In fact, they financed this organization or cult being the billionaire heirs to the Seagram fortune.

Then you realize that the entire Paul Manafort indictment is related to his time spent working with the Podesta group in Ukraine.

And you then DuckDuckGo: Tony Podesta art collection

https://duckduckgo.com/?q=tony+podesta+art+collection&atb=v123-5__&t=cros&ia=web

And you realize Tony Podesta resigned and they closed down their firm, one that generated $24 million the previous year.

https://www.politico.com/story/2017/11/10/podesta-group-last-days-244799

So you then start to put all these things together and it all just seems a little too coincidental. Also McCabe is facing a Grand Jury:

https://www.businessinsider.com/grand-jury-investigates-andrew-mccabe-2018-9

Deputy Attorney General Rod Rosenstein told President Donald Trump last week that he isn’t a target of any part of Special Counsel Robert Mueller’s investigation or the probe into his longtime lawyer, Michael Cohen, according to several people familiar with the matter.

https://www.bloomberg.com/news/articles/2018-04-19/rosenstein-said-to-tell-trump-he-s-not-target-in-mueller-probe

Then Rudy Guiliani stated that Cohen has tapes with hundreds of journalists:

https://theconservativetreehouse.com/2018/07/29/giuliani-president-trump-has-recordings-of-dozens-of-journalists-discussing-him-with-michael-cohen/comment-page-1/

And the media has seen an unredacted version of the FISA since March 2017.

I hope you understand what that means.

Beyond all that, we now learn through the senators’ memo, and some follow-up reporting, that two longtime Clinton cronies, Cody Shearer and Sidney Blumenthal, fed their own anti-Trump dossier to Steele, through a State Department official, Jonathan Winer. In the fall of 2016, Steele, while working on his Clinton-funded project, reported this Clinton-crony information to the FBI.

Clinton's own political hitman gave info to Steele to put in the dossier. Hahahaha wow.

Before you call me a raving lunatic, a person on the verge of commiting violence at any moment in order to strike back at the Deep State, expand your thinking.

Do your own research and make up your own mind.

Lol your argument was done when you use the Podesta emails. The only pedophilia there is being read into by the obsessed.

The obsessed?

Don't piss on my leg and tell me it's raining.

Don't insult my intelligence

You going to really pretend that Tamera Luzzato didn't tell John Podesta in that email that there would be kids in the pool for entertainment?

You gonna pretend her website didn't talk about spending time with her grandchild raw and uncut?

What are you defending here?

Anyone with kids saw the pool email for what it was: kids are entertaining to older people. You think it’s more likely the kids own grandmother was whoring them out?

That's pretty interesting you say that. Anyone with kids.

I have 3 kids.

They are not entertaining to old people.

My parents can't watch all 3 kids for more than a couple hours, because they are not entertaining, they are work.

Around a pool? Are you frickin kidding me man?

You and the others that have responded to me defending this evidence as nothing to see, why are you doing that?

What is your motivation?

What if these children were being abused?

You just don't give a shit?

There is nothing wrong with taking about this and asking for an investigation.

Brett Kavanaugh's accuser can call for a FBI investigation after 30 years and zero evidence, no crime scene, no emails, no crime reported?

But this, this is definitely nothing guys. Especially considering Hillary's ties to Bronfman and NXIVM, Laura Silsby in Haiti, the massive fraud that was Haiti. Nothing to see here. Kids as entertainment. Pathetic you are.

I also have kids and their grandparents and great aunts and uncles always love to see them. Just a difference between families, that’s why me and others are responding like this.

Raw and uncut--ie unedited. That is, ya you're not just getting the cute fb snapshot--you're getting to see them running around yelling/bickering/all pumped up on sugar/asking zany questions etc.lol. General parent stuff that non-parents might not usually see. Or grandma's delivering her grandkids to be molested?? Really? Reading a sexual slant in to that exchange says far more about the person claiming it than any of the actual words do.

Have you ever spent an afternoon with a bunch of kids at your pool??

Look at the invite list for that e-mail.

It's nine women and eight men.

If you're telling me that Luzzato was advertising child sex to a mixed group of men and women... in a fucking e-mail , then it says a whole lot more about you than it does Tamara Luzzato.

"Raw and uncut" is a term as old as film itself. It means "unedited". Only to perverts like you, does it mean something nefarious, because you were raised (and obsessed with) Girls Gone Wild videos.

Quit projecting.

You're a disgusting piece of human garbage if you're going to honestly sweep this under the rug and not at least call for an investigation.

But you're a shill bot throw away account.

Why is John Podesta being told there will be children in a pool for entertainment? I'd like to to know.

I'm not giving raw and uncut the pass as meaning unedited as that makes no sense in that context.

You don't offer anyone to spend time with your grand daughter unedited, or frickin raw and uncut.

If my mom or mother in law had that up about my kids on a website I'd call the damn police.

DO NOT attempt to turn my concern about this information around on me as though I'm projecting anything you Saul Alinsky wanna be.

John Podesta isn't being told shit, stupid.

It's an invite to an early fall farm party, where lots of families will be attending. Your attempt to turn it into something sick and perverted says so much more about you than it does Tamera Luzzato.

There is only ONE meaning of "raw and uncut". It means unedited footage, full stop. It doesn't mean "naked" or "topless" or any of the other meanings you've assigned it in your pervy, pedo mind.

It means *"come check out the video of my grandkid"*. That's all it means.

Now get back to your "research", you sick fuck.

The Q subs frequently had comment sections full of posts wishing for violence against elected officials.

There were pretty much no calls for extrajudicial violence.

Q followers tend to be those already prone to radical, insular belief structures and those are easily radicalized.

Completely arbitrary statement.

The Russian scandal has much more interesting information and evidence to discuss if this were an actual conspiracy sub.

"Don't listen to Q's conspiracy theory. Listen to my conspiracy theory."

The fun conspiracy to discuss would be who is most likely to be behind something that has radicalized a non-negligible chunk of the US' permanent underclass

The Q community of made up of members of the US's permanent underclass? I'd love to see your source for data on Q follower democraphics. ;)

and how does that figure in to the aggressive response by Reddit admin

This is pretty much the extent of the reasoning: "Corporate media say Q bad. Reddit make go away."

All the good comments in here getting downvoted and vice versa.

New mods already operating in full swing.

Define your version of "pretty much" and "extrajudicial" in relation to what he said.

It means calling for Obama et all to be hanged isn’t threatening because they’re guilty of treason. It’s idiotic, but that’s that they mean.

It means calling for Obama et all to be hanged isn’t threatening because they’re guilty of treason

It's a call for the legal system to inflict the worst punishment possible, rather than a call for assassination or some other illegitimate act, yes.

Worst punishment possible without evidence or a trial sure feels just like a lynch mob.

Worst punishment possible without evidence or a trial sure feels just like a lynch mob.

They aren't saying it should be done without a trial or without evidence.

Really? Because they are already saying I can’t wait to see Obama hanged and...when was his trial again?

You don't get a trial at a military tribunal

See how that circular logic makes it a threat?

Define your version of "pretty much" and "extrajudicial" in relation to what he said.

"Pretty much": none I ever saw (but I don't say none because people post crazy stuff that mods delete)

"Extrajudicial": consult a dictionary.

But all of the things they're accusing Obama of occurred when he was President. Oddly enough they/the Rs now seem to believe a President(donnie) is incapable of committing a crime/being held accountable. Weird. Those 'beliefs' apparently got put on hold for B.Clinton as well. And as if it isn't transparent enough--they actually seem to take issue with anyone pointing out the blatant hypocrisy of it all.

In what world is dragging politicians into the street legal? I frequently saw references to a "day of the rope"

Most commenters were not wishing for a fair and civil trial. They were wishing that Obama and other democrats be killed and that's it.

In what world is dragging politicians into the street legal?

There was no reference to dragging people into the street.

Most commenters were not wishing for a fair and civil trial. They were wishing that Obama and other democrats be killed and that's it.

They weren't saying "So-and-so should hang but without a trial".

Nonsensical allegations.

https://archive.is/QraZZ

Not unlikely a call for it to be done extrajudicially.

Here's a Tweet I just grabbed from Twitter calling for Trump's assassination. Ban Twitter?

https://twitter.com/NikkiHarabedian/status/1043557327511674882

But I thought you said there was no reference to dragging people into the street?

We're not talking about that tweet. We're talking about calls for violence in great awakening, which has gone from "pretty much never happens" to "well it does but its legal" to "well other people do it too"

But I thought you said there was no reference to dragging people into the street?

I didn't see that, but the context's clearly not calling for it to be done extrajudicially. Public hanging after trial.

We're not talking about that tweet. We're talking about calls for violence in great awakening

Frame things all you want. Calling for a legal execution may not be classy, but isn't a threat to public order.

While not required, you are requested to use the NP (No Participation) domain of reddit when crossposting. This helps to protect both your account, and the accounts of other users, from administrative shadowbans. The NP domain can be accessed by replacing the "www" in your reddit link with "np".

I am a bot, and this action was performed automatically. Please contact the moderators of this subreddit if you have any questions or concerns.

Do these people not consider the fact that those that want to silence Q and the movement can anonymously post on the board and say things that can be used to ban the sub?

It's not like you have credentials checked before posting in GA. Anybody can say anything. People LARP as Q followers and post violent comments as well. Do you really believe this shit doesn't happen?

How to deal with groups committing wrongthink:

1. Label them alt-right or Nazis
2. Claim they’re all actively calling for violence even though it’s a small minority that’s often downvoted or ostracized from the group. 2.5 Get some dipshits to post ‘totally legit proof’ that the sub is a ticking time bomb, encouraging political violence. Usually includes posts as “proof” with little to no upvotes or single comments with hidden scores.
3. Ban the sub

The fact you, think it’s a counter response to the Russian, investigation tells me you aren’t, familiar with Q.

I've been following Q since Pamphlet... It's obviously a psyop meant to distract and counteract the Russia narrative.

How so? ^,

Biggest bullshit comment on this thread. You want violent followers go to the anti Trump subs. Show proof and I will show mine

Do you think FPH was a threat?

Reverse psycology? Bring in more believers? Is q considered the "radical right?" I mean, if someone wants everybody to really fight, what better way than to divide, then, create an entity that will appeal to a demographic. Make the entity seem very mysterious and cryptic and benevolent, yet censor it and ridicule it on the msm. It just seems like psychology 101, manipulation level 98. If I'm wrong I have no problem eating my words.

Except Q has stated MULTIPLE times

They want you DIVIDED Race to DIVIDE Political Parties to DIVIDE Fear to DIVIDE

It's been stated multiple times over and over again that we the people hold the power if we can come together as Americans and take control of our Government.

ok, i get that. But you do not see anything that the Q entity says as dividing? Blaming? Same ole gaming? It goes deep into the end statement on your comment. We hold the power as a people, not as individuals, but as a unit. We however do not comprehend, as humans, and for good reason, what that exactly is yet.

A unit is made up of a group of individuals.

Same ole blaming?

Calling out Israel?

I'm thinking about a unit/power in a whole different way here, sorry. Same ole blaming in the sense that, it's the lefts fault, its the rights fault. Scale tips this way and back, round and round. Not sure where you surmised I was calling out Israel though.

Simple explanation... Platforms like reddit don't want to be responcible for any blowback that comes from the Q community

Complex explication... Look at pizzagate. A crazy conspirty theory involving a pizza shop and a pedophile ring motivated a guy to enter the establishment with a gun and shoot the place up to protect children. Now apply this to Q.. What happens if all the conspiracy talk about the deep government motivated some individual to take a shot at Nancy Pelosi or Dick Cheney whomever the current suspected grand wizard is. The news headlines will be Q conspiracy theorists ok the website reddit just like info wars got painted with the pizza gate conspiracy. Look how well things are turning out for Alex Jones after that.

Pizzagate is real.

It's crazy to me that we're still having discussions about Pizzagate. I'm a pretty open-minded person, but I have never before seen a conspiracy so manufactured out of nothing for a very clear political reason.

But if you ever come up with a victim or testimony or real evidence, feel free to bring it forward.

There is probably more evidence for pizzagate than any other conspiracy I've ever seen. Many hundreds of pages of linked and cross-referenced evidence on voat.

Victim?

Testimony?

Direct evidence linking individuals to crime?

Not weird wordings in email. Not things that can be written off as coincidences. Real. Evidence.

www.voat.co/v/pizzagate

If you actually care then do the research. If you're ignorant and have already decided then you don't need to talk to me anymore.

Lol that's the response of every pizzagater I've ever talked to.

"Where's the actual evidence?"

"Uh you're just ignorant."

"I looked and didn't see anything."

"Well, then you didn't look hard enough."

That's because it's hard to break down hundreds of hours of research into a few sound / image bits for the uninformed. No matter what I post you're going to say the same thing: "That's not proof, it's just coincidence". And maybe you're even right given one piece of evidence. It's the pattern that emerges after reading many dozens of hours of research that shows the real story, but if you've already decided then you aren't likely to put in the work, are you?

In any case, I don't care what you believe, so do as you will.

I think you're confusing a thousand little things with one big thing. No, a thousand little coincidences is not tantamount to evidence when those pieces are specifically selected for the purpose of supporting the theory.

If you can't provide witnesses, victims, or testimonials related to a crime, and you can't provide physical evidence, then you have no theory.

Well, I think that I'm a trained researcher with 7 years of university education, and that I'm perfectly capable of seeing the big picture after dozens or hundreds of hours of research. I actually started on the other side of the pizzagate debate btw.

There are all those things at voat, besides maybe physical evidence, which is awfully hard to produce on the internet, lol.

In any case, believe what you will, I'm not an evangelist.

Ok so we can just go ahead and confirm Kavanaugh then right?

No witnesses, physical evidence, no crime reported, no victim and no testimonials because she refuses.

Nice sounds good.

What are you talking about? We have a victim (in fact, we have a few now). We're waiting on their testimonials. And the claim was sent to the FBI.

This is not an FBI investigation.

She can file a police report at her local police station.

The victim doesn't get to call for a Federal Investigation and determine whose jurisdiction this allegation would fall into .

The point is, though, that we have a victim and a claim with further testimony in the wings.

Pizzagate does not have any of this.

What kind of victim waits 30 years to make these allegations because she has been ashamed and scared to speak out...

Then she decides to write a letter to Diane Feinstein and throws herself into national headlines for weeks on end?

Testimony will not convict Kavanaugh of anything.

Perhaps she felt compelled to speak out once she saw that her assaulter was about to be confirmed to the highest court in the nation and was disgusted by this fact.

A thousand little nuggets of shit still add up to one big pile of shit, friend.

Cool story bud

Well, out of all those nuggets you've carefully researched and examined, surely there must be one most compelling, convincing, damning piece of evidence that you can share with skeptics.

Go for it.

Not your RA bud.

"if theres one thing that makesbit credible its how people keep debunking it. If it wasnt real noone would be proving it wrong" smh

If there's one thing that gives "Russian vollusion" some credence it's the way red team is so desperately trying to silence it.

Fake News! No Collusion. Witch Hunt. Then he runs out and dances on a string like a whipped dog for the boss lol.

and thats it lol

Yeah, so many Russia Collusion subs banned. CNN is terrified to even mention it.

Streisand effect. Its all planned to pacify the people yearning for anti establishment embelishments and the safety of groupthought.

I lurk this sub and the question you ask is important. I have my doubts with "Q". I don't understand why "they" censored anything related to Q. I striked Q as a Larp and a Psyop, granted I enjoyed the free thinking Q promoted which is question everything. The situation is very odd. I am having a hard time reading it.

"the free thinking Q promoted which is question everything"

There is the answer as to why the sub was banned.

lol freethinking? Q promotes that you blindly follow Q like a cultist lemming.

Does it? I don't follow it.

TPTB want you to blindly accept and not think though. So if it is promoting free-thinking, as the person I responded to posits, that is a good enough reason for it to be closed.

They want us to look at Kim Kardashian's ass cheeks and debate amounts yourself if there are fake. The moment we start asking the real questions, what's when agent Smith shows up.

they claim to "question everything" but literally question nothing.

They believe whatever Q tells them without any proof proof

And certainly don't question the biggest question which is cute himself

they claim to "question everything" but literally question nothing.

exactly

Most Q followers are not questioning anything. They are just blindly believing anons on message boards without any critical thinking or research of their own. They have effectively become cultists.

Are you the spokesman for every person who follows Q? You act like you know the thoughts of every person who has ever read Q.

You are right, I am only basing this off the posts I have seen from Q supporters on message boards and discords. I cannot speak for every single individual person. I am simply speaking about the majority of the cult.

You act like you know the thoughts of every person who has ever read Q.

Some of us actually read the comments on GreatAwakening before it was banned. It was a cult, they didn't allow you to say bad things about Q

TPTB want you to blindly accept and not think though

When you bring up the fact that Q is wrong about a lot of things, and Q supporters tell you to "wait and see", doesn't that sound like they're advocating blind acceptance? When all of the available evidence is that McCain, who was 81 years old, died of a brain tumor, but some anonymous source on 8chan INSISTS that he was taken out by a secret military tribunal while failing to actually provide evidence, does that really sound like promoting free thinking?

Well I'm not balls deep in this stuff like some people but I've been reading Q's posts for awhile now, and Q never really promotes that iirc. It's always the followers that promote the "cultist" shit. I think Q's been like "trust in the plan" or "trust in Q" but that doesn't really seem like they're promoting blind worship, you feel me?

"trust in Q"

but that doesn't really seem like they're promoting blind worship, you feel me?

huh?

​

He has never said that OP doesn't know what he is talking about when he said that

they claim to "question everything" but literally question nothing. And certainly don't question the biggest question which is cute himself

So this is the new talking point, noted

I've noticed that the queue talking points have gotten crappier

They basically resulted to "wait and see" and "all for a LARP?"

It means even they must realize that it's not real

That sounds exactly like blind worship

Q's never said anything along the lines of "trust in Q". Q's said "trust the plan" (the Trump administration's plan) which is a pretty normal partisan message.

Q's catchphrase is literally "where we go one, we go all" or WWG1WGA for short. That's cult 101

Q's catchphrase is literally "where we go one, we go all" or WWG1WGA for short. That's cult 101

Good lord.

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Unus_pro_omnibus,_omnes_pro_uno

Q is no more a cult than CNN is a cult.

When people repeat that catchphrase after calls for violence, any organization would get concerned. Some of those threads were freakshows, especially immediately after McCains death.

When people repeat that catchphrase after calls for violence, any organization would get concerned.

There are pretty much no calls for extrajudicial violence in the Q community.

Some of those threads were freakshows, especially immediately after McCains death.

Same sort of talk from liberals after Scalia's death.

There were ONLY calls for violence

In fact q himself at one point called for violence. Which is probably why any board supporting him has been banned

Source?

downvote for asking for source lol

Yeah I mean I'm not in the qult by any means but I'm not gonna believe he called for violence without actually seeing that :/

There were ONLY calls for violence

Completely wrong. I was on there all the time and saw no calls for extralegal violence.

In fact q himself at one point called for violence

Completely false. Feel free to provide a link to a post to prove otherwise.

Ok, now I know you're bullshitting.

Please provide a source with actual upvotes and support, not one comment at the bottom of a chain that had yet to be deleted or flagged.

In fact q himself at one point called for violence.

Tell me precisely whom he called violence upon.

Imagine assassinating a Supreme Court justice just to lose your nomination to a reality TV star...

That's a succinct way to put it lol. Trump plays the "wrestling heel" role well... the perfect guy to, through taunting, lure bad actors into taking risks. ;)

boomers ... and Christians.

That's what weirds me out the most. If I hold any belief and a large amount of baby boomers and/or Christians start agreeing with me, I re-evaluate that belief. If your peers in any group are baby boomers and the perpetual superstitious you're almost certainly being misled.

If I hold any belief and a large amount of baby boomers and/or Christians start agreeing with me, I re-evaluate that belief

As someone who grew up subjected to the Boomer cultural canon I agree this isn't the worst heuristic. ;)

I've got more sympathies with Christians now than I used to, though, because it seems to me that the old cliche of people wanting something to believe in is actually true and there are worse things than Christianity. Communism acts a lot like a religion, is gaining traction very quickly in the West, and, in full bloom, can get pretty hairy.

Boomers

They didn't only grow up in an echo chamber. The entirety of their education, culture, and experience was cold war propaganda. As a generalization, they're completely incapable of critical objective reasoning. Anything they flock to in numbers is guaranteed to be a scam. Also, they weren't merely asleep at the wheel socially. They were and remain the largest impediment to any sensible social progress.

Christians

I'm sympathetic towards Christians but also wary. They hold a very easily falsified belief system and defend it aggressively. Like boomers, anything that they flock to in numbers and compartmentalize their faith into is very likely a scam.

Communism

There's that cold war propaganda. The kids walking around calling themselves communists these days are typically just democratic socialists at worst. We'll never see communism in the west.

There's that cold war propaganda. The kids walking around calling themselves communists these days are typically just democratic socialists at worst. We'll never see communism in the west.

You underestimate communism. It's been popular in academia for a long time. Anecdotal, of course, I had a friend say, just the other day, that she's starting to think communism's the answer. Seeing Maoist techniques becoming prevalent even in mainstream culture is a warning sign. Yuri Bezmenov's lectures on communist subversion in general are worth a watch.

I'm familiar with Bezmenov, prefer Solzhenitsyn's more dire warnings. What must be understood is that the KGB is still in charge of Russia and they are no longer communist, nor would communism support their goals. The warnings should be applied, per Solzhenitsyn, to the actual kgb apparatus and their tactic of undermining western governments by sowing division.

Q seems to fit the bill quite well

What must be understood is that the KGB is still in charge of Russia and they are no longer communist, nor would communism support their goals. The warnings should be applied, per Solzhenitsyn, to the actual kgb apparatus and their tactic of undermining western governments by sowing division.

This is what I mean by communism being pragmatic. The end goal of communism is authoritarianism. What the authoritarianism looks like it immaterial. Neo-communists like SJWs absolutely fit the goal of sowing divisiion.

Q seems to fit the bill quite well

Not at all. Q is advocating support of Trump and a narrative that long-term corruption will be addressed. There's nothing inherently divisive about it.

Trump has likely been owned by the KGB since at least the 90s and is by far the most divisive figure in politics today.

Trump has likely been owned by the KGB since at least the 90s

If there was any evidence for this is would have either been leaked or used to keep him out of office.

the most divisive figure in politics today.

True, but my guess is there's a reason for that.

If there was any evidence for this is would have either been leaked or used to keep him out of office.

There is significant circumstantial evidence available to people interested in connecting dots and it was used heavily to try to keep him out of the presidency. It just didn't work and now there's an actual criminal investigation.

Obama...

What political office does Obama hold today? He's not really relevant. Although BLM is another psyop confirmed to be promulgated heavily by the KGB.

There is significant circumstantial evidence available to people interested in connecting dots and it was used heavily to try to keep him out of the presidency

One of the things I've always found odd about Trump is how little dirt has hit the mainstream about him, despite the press's antipathy. He's obviously a pervert and sociopath and you can't really do the kind of business he's done without some criminal connections.

What political office does Obama hold today? He's not really relevant.

I'm just putting Trump in a historical context, something to compare Trump's divisiveness with. Obama's divisiveness was much more subtle though, I'll give him that. ;)

Although BLM is another psyop confirmed to be promulgated heavily by the KGB.

If you've got any links for this I'd be interested in checking them out. It's definitely possible and fits in Dugin's polarization strategy. Have you heard of the book "The Perestroika Deception"?

Trump dirt

Quite a bit came out about his shady business deals and Russian loans. There were numerous headlines about it. His supporters either didn't care or had it all filtered through Fox News. It was overwhelming to others and just became background noise. A few stalwarts are still crying out for his tax returns.

BLM

Below is one article. I doubt BLM was entirely astroturfed from the get go, but it was certainly latched onto and signal boosted. The whackiest antics of BLM seem to have been useful idiots unwittingly dancing to the KGB's tune. Straight out of Dugin. I dig your repertoire, bud.

https://www.vox.com/platform/amp/identities/2018/4/10/17219676/facebook-black-lives-matter-page-fake

A few stalwarts are still crying out for his tax returns.

It's very weird that those haven't been leaked. Trump I think is protected by (or a tool of) military intelligence so if he's compromised then military intelligence may too be compromised.

The whackiest antics of BLM seem to have been useful idiots unwittingly dancing to the KGB's tune.

Ah right... I remember that stuff coming out. I think Russia also organized some rally with Michael Moore too. Sticking your hand in everywhere is, at the least, a good gaslighting strategy. In general, the Democrats association with that whole SJW realm seems bad strategy, but I guess the SJW/BLM association is seen as increasing their appeal to youths/blacks.

Straight out of Dugin. I dig your repertoire, bud.

Haha thanks. I haven't dug too deep into Dugin,but his odd background (National Bolshevism, etc.) might be explained, now that I think about it, as him being an undercover operative for Russia to infiltrate opposition.

https://snew.github.io/r/conspiracy/comments/9fnvyk/are_we_supposed_to_believe_that_all_these_boards/e5xx5bk/

I read that sub probably every day from beginning until end.

I'd be hard-pressed to find a single day where there wasn't at least one comment fantasizing over Obama, Clinton, or the Podesta's being executed. Probably every other day, there was a comment drooling about the prospect of looming civil war.

Say what you want about Reddit admins, but I don't blame them in the slightest for not wanting to be the hosting platform for the next dummy that decides to pick up a gun, and take matters into his own hands. The potential liability is staggering.

So I'll tell you what... you build up your own platform, and provide a soapbox for people to scream about civil war and lynching of public officials. If there is such a demand for it, I'm sure you'll make millions.

'd be hard-pressed to find a single day where there wasn't at least one comment fantasizing over Obama, Clinton, or the Podestas being executed

Execution being a possible outcome of a legal process, yes.

Probably every other day, there was a comment drooling about the prospect of looming civil war.

I've heard this in both left and right communities. It pisses me off because it is not something to wish for. ;)

The potential liability is staggering.

I've yet to hear of a social media platform being sued for the act of a lone lunatic. CDA 230 might protect against this given it absolves social media of a lot of publisher liability.

So I'll tell you what... you build up your own platform

Gab.ai has done this and was banned form Apple App Store, Google Play, and has gotten threatened from Microsoft where they're hosted.

Execution being a possible outcome of a legal process, yes.

Stop being disingenuous. They're calling for extrajudical tribunals held at GITMO for non-military civilians. How anyone can consider themselves "patriots" after parroting that nonsense is beyond me.

It pisses me off because it is not something to wish for. ;)

Agreed 100%. What kind of self-proclaimed "patriots" jerk off to the prospect of a second civil war? Answer: Q followers.

I've yet to hear of a social media platform being sued for the act of a lone lunatic.

Gawker. Nobody wants to be the next Gawker. $140M judgement.

That was for posting a fucking sex tape. Imagine, for just one moment, that some group of Q-tards from r/greatawakening gets riled up over some potential bombshell in the Muller report, and decides to "take their country back" by force.

The potential liability for providing these geniuses a platform to suck each other into a frenzy is staggering . If people died as a result, it would make Gawker's $140M judgement look like chump change.

Reddit is 100% right in their decision to not provide a clubhouse for retards.

Gab.ai has done this and was banned from Apple App Store

Gee... it seems like lots of companies aren't really in to providing a platform for unhinged retards. Go figure.

Stop being disingenuous. They're calling for extrajudical tribunals held at GITMO for non-military citizens

Stop being dramatic. Same type of thing as folks calling for Trump to be impeached (or even assassinated) even though no crime's been established.

I just found, within a minute, a Tweet from today calling for the assassination of Trump:

https://twitter.com/NikkiHarabedian/status/1043557327511674882

Ban Twitter?

Gawker. Nobody wants to be the next Gawker. $140M judgement.

Gawker isn't a social media platform. They were sued for something they published rather than user content.

The potential liability for providing these geniuses a platform to suck each other into a frenzy is staggering.

Again: read CDA 230 so you at least have a cursory knowledge of law around this. Twitter has ISIS accounts up for the longest time.

Gee... it seems like lots of companies aren't really in to providing a platform for unhinged retards. Go figure.

Yet /r/antifa and /r/militant aren't banned. Go figure.

Ban Twitter?

No, Einstein. Report @NikkiHarabedian. At a minimum, she'll be given a time out... and more likely banned for that tweet.

I just took 30 seconds out of my busy day to report her. Did you? Or do you just want to bitch about how unfairly QAnons are treated?

read CDA 230 so you at least have a cursory knowledge of law around this.

I have read it, and I fail to see where you believe it provides immunity to websites for hosting discussions of criminal activity. I routinely saw posts on GA to the effect of "if arrests don't start happening soon, it's time for us to take matters into our own hands" and "we have all the guns, they are sitting ducks in their cities ".

Now, to the mods credit, these posts were generally removed quickly... but, again, it's 100% within Reddit's right to deny access to their platform.

If I were to make a post here accusing your mother of having sex with farm animals, Reddit would be protected under CDA 230. There's the difference. Ask the founders of BackPage how CDA 230 protected them when they provided a platform for child traffickers to run unchecked.

Yet /r/antifa and /r/militant aren't banned. Go figure.

You're not serious, right? Those subs are complete jokes, with 4K and 2K subscribers, respectively... most of whom are alt-right trolls.

If there's violent rhetoric on those subs, and the mods aren't keeping it cleaned up... they deserve to be banned, as well. Why is this such a difficult concept for you to grasp? It has nothing to do with censorship, and everything to do with optics and liability.

No, Einstein. Report @NikkiHarabedian. At a minimum, she'll be given a time out... and more likely banned for that tweet.

So hold the user accountable accountable for their content, rather than the platform or subreddit it's posted in? Crazy concept. ;)

I just took 30 seconds out of my busy day to report her. Did you? Or do you just want to bitch about how unfairly QAnons are treated?

Why would I? I'm not the one fixated on policing speech, I'm complaining about double standards.

Now, to the mods' credit, these posts were generally removed quickly

Not a problem then.

You're not serious, right? Those subs are complete jokes

They're subs explicitly centered around extrajudicial violence, unlike GA, regardless of whether or not they've been raided by non-sympathizers .Optics and liability?

It has nothing to do with censorship, and everything to do with optics and liability.

You said yourself you'd report the worst comments and they'd get dealt with.

Why would I? I'm not the one fixated on policing speech, I'm complaining about double standards.

Again. Their platform, their rules. Make your own platform if you don't like it. I'd bet you're a staunch "free market" advocate in everything except for this debate, right?

Now, to the mods' credit, these posts were generally removed quickly Not a problem then.

Still a problem, if Reddit doesn't want to be perceived as a gathering place for folks who masturbate over the thought of hanging John Podesta by his neck in a public fashion.

They're subs explicitly centered around extrajudicial violence, unlike GA

I don't think this is the response you want to hear, but I would argue that r/antifa and r/militants should be taken down, as well. I have never given those subs more than a cursory glance, so I can only speak from my experience with GA... but it was a toilet, and Reddit is better off without it.

You said yourself you'd report the worst comments and they'd get dealt with.

I reported several GA posts threatening violence to the Reddit admins, I don't remember reporting any to the mods... because let's face it, the mods loved that kind of talk, just like the rest of the sub.

Again... I'll say it one final time: If Reddit doesn't want to be associated with calls for execution of political enemies (GA), or calls for destruction of property (Antifa), or calls for physical violence against the President (Militant), it is 100% their right to give those groups the boot.

I would argue that r/antifa and r/militants should be taken down

At least you're consistent.

CNN is a cult.

The most trusted name in news.

pretty telling...

That is from JFK‘s boat. ;-)

Are you saying JFK is a cult leader? ;)

Another faked "Q" proof.

Q followers are without a doubt the dumbest people on the face of the earth.

WiggaWigga

rewrite of the 3 musketeers. All for one and one for all.

Isn't that true though? As we go as a nation, we all go? It's just acknowledging that we are in this thing together.

Comparing it to blind party partisanship is not putting it in a good light either...

Q continually says to, "trust the plan". A comment that arises in every Q thread once a prediction time table passes.

Again: "Trust the plan" is normal partisan messaging.

Except 'the plan' is completely derived by Q. Without Q, there would be no 'plan'. In essence the whole idea of Q is a 'plan' to overthrow the 'deep state'. Q and 'the plan' are essentially synonymous.

He has not one EVER said "trust in Q"... that is misleading everyone here... never said, not once.

No just "trust the plan"

which is essentially the same thing

The plan is to drain the swamp though. So when he says that, he is saying to trust that the swamp is still being drained. They're working on it.

Blind trust is certainly a fool's prerogative, which is the irony of the whole situation.

I love how "drain the swamp" has morphed into taking out bad actors in the alphabet agencies.

Don't get me wrong, I'd like nothing more than to see these career spooks suck the pipe... but during the election, "DTS" clearly was in reference to career politicians, corrupt lobbyists, and all the assorted fuckery that comes with those two groups of slimeballs.

If anything, Trump has filled the swamp with more of these kinds of people.

donnie drain the swamp?? You fell for that? LOL He's been the living embodiment of the swamp his entire life(just like his dad). Now instead of being the one paying the bribes--he's on the other side accepting them.

If he's "cleaning up govt" where are all the corruption prosecutions??

Do you want to see corruption prosecutions with people who were in Washington before Trump?

Sure. Why not.

Then we can hope for it.

"I don't follow Q, but somehow I happen to know everything about him."

You are not allowed to question trumps behavior regarding Israel.

lol I question it all the time and I'm Jewish.

I meant on the q boards, on the great awakening board , Posts bringing that up were removed.

You have spend zero time in Q land if you think that.

Not true. I saw posts that asked about trumps behavior regarding Israel removed from the great awakening sub for not supporting the q movement.

The reddit mods were over sensitive at times but keep in mind there were subs with thousands of users dedicated to infiltrating and destroying the sub.

Go visit the voat or 8ch page that Q actually posts to, you will see some VERY heated discussion on Israel and why Trump is not openly opposing them.

Okay, I am happy to hear that conversation is being had.

That could be it. Aside from few fuck ups like 'no outside comms' which is definitely not what a cult leader would say or 'predicting' that Hillary and Podesta were arrested, Q's not so terrible in a sense.

Aside from Iran regime change propaganda as well, if Q told it's followers to look up how regime changes always ended up, it would be this bad.

The Q movement is the opposite of promoting research. Tells you not to question anything but cue says and just "trust in his plan".

and if you do research that proves Q wrong it tells you to shut up and just trust in him

it tells you to blindly support anything Trump does no matter what. Which is what a Colt would do in the opposite of what an anti-corruption movement would do

Trump could raise taxes on the poor by 50% and lower taxes on the rich by 20% and they would tell you it's all part of the plan

they claim to "question everything" but literally question nothing. And certainly don't question the biggest question which is cute himself

question everything? You mean only question what I tell you to question and in the manner I tell you to question it.. otherwise your just another deep state shill.. thats my problem with all this q shit. I don't however think they should have their subs shut down.

" I am having a hard time reading it. "..

A bunch of Americans (again) believe ET is real, via "Q".. - Do you need more clarification?

If it was just a LARP the establishment wouldn't be hyperventilating about it. It's interesting to me that they're not claiming it's Russia in origin: that's kind of their go-to move for everything these days. Q seems to be a PSYOP doing a number of things (bypassing corporate media to present a different narrative, promoting patriotism, encouraging research and memes, etc.).

If it was a real Investigation in the US establishment wouldn't be hyperventilating about it.

It's interesting how if it was a real investigation there wouldn't be any bans

Coincidentally it's exactly what I would expect of a violent larp

It's interesting to me that they're basically just a cult whose primary objective is to never question Trump on anything

Coincidentally it's exactly what I would expect of a violent larp

Except there's nothing violent about it.

It's interesting to me that they're basically just a cult whose primary objective is to never question Trump on anything

The Q community has next to no properties of a cult. You disagreeing with them doesn't make them a cult.

Except there's nothing violent about it.

so far at least three people have been arrested for holding up restricted areas with guns. One guy shut down the Hoover Dam with a truckload of weapons another guy held up in a homeless camp with a truckload of weapons and a different guy shot up a pizza parlor

The Q community has next to no properties of a cult.

then you obviously haven't read any of their posts. The ONLY qualities they have are that of a cult.

They check off every single box in a cult

so far at least three people have been arrested for holding up restricted areas with guns. One guy shut down the Hoover Dam with a truckload of weapons another guy held up in a homeless camp with a truckload of weapons and a different guy shot up a pizza parlor

The pizza parlor thing had nothing to do with Q.

A Bernie supporter shot and wounded US congressmen. We don't blame Bernie's movement for that because Bernie's movement doesn't advocate violence. Same diff here.

They check off every single box in a cult

You have no idea what you're talking about.

Here's a checklist of cultish attributes... the Q community checks 1 out of 15 boxes:

http://www.csj.org/infoserv_cult101/checklis.htm

Not a cult.

The pizza parlor thing had nothing to do with Q.

Actually it did. This q nonsense is just a more unhinged extension of pizzagate

supporter shot and wounded US congressmen last year.

Frisco I do blame the Democrats movement for inspiring it. But even if you don't you can't deny that the q nonsense ditectly i spired people to arm themselves and take action

the guy that got arrested on the Hoover Dam is writing letters every day to Trump talking about the Q conspiracy

You have no idea what you're talking about.

No. YOU have no idea what you're talking about.

cult

a system of religious veneration and devotion directed toward a particular figure or object.

The group displays excessively zealous and unquestioning commitment to its leader (its leader is q and trump. Check)

Questioning dissent are discouraged or even punished.(check)

The leadership dictate how members should act and feel (check)

The group is elitist. claiming a special exalted status for itself (they believe they were the chosen ones by Trump to decode all these special clues that were given specifically to them them)

Theres more but im not going thru all. But they exhibit all the signs

http://www.csj.org/infoserv_cult101/checklis.htm

Actually it did. This q nonsense is just a more unhinged extension of pizzagate

Q didn't exist when that incident happened. You can't rationally blame it on Q.

Frisco I do blame the Democrats movement for inspiring it.

Should Democrats be banned from social media?

But even if you don't you can't deny that the q nonsense ditectly i spired people to arm themselves and take action

Q, like Bernie, has never advocated anything other than normie political participation. You're employing guilt-by-association, a fallacy.

Theres more but im not going thru all. But they exhibit all the signs

You are misrepresenting the things you claim it checks off.

For example:

"The group displays excessively zealous and unquestioning commitment to its leader" is, in full, "The group displays excessively zealous and unquestioning commitment to its leader and (whether he is alive or dead) regards his belief system, ideology, and practices as the Truth, as law ".

"Questioning dissent are discouraged or even punished" is the only valid one.

It's absurd to claim Q is a cult.

You basically described the MSM and it's blind following.

If Q is a LARP or not is irrelevant. At this point it’s safe to say that if he is a larp, he’s pretty goddamn knowledgeable about the subject matter at hand. He’s amassed a massive following of people (you’re kidding yourself if you think his reach is anywhere less than millions) and he’s telling them to look in places that “they” really don’t want you checking out. There’s a narrative being built and a movie to be played, and Q points out the plot holes.

but he's not knowledgeable about the subject at hand.

Posting a lot about it doesn't mean that he knows a lot about it.

He's been wrong more often than he's been right

but the Q followers aren't typically that educated or informed and don't typically fact check him so they don't know that he's been wrong

they don't typically understand how government works or know much about world events. So whenever he blurts out one of his mouth diarrheas it sounds like a insight

He's been wrong more often than he's been right

This is highly debatable

It's bit debatable in the slightest

I’m not going to sit here and explain to you all the things that Q has accurately predicted, but anyone who has actually examined the Q drops knows that he’s been very accurate for a lot of his predictions.

Thats fine, I've read q subs for a while and ive still yet to see something he predicted come true. Nunes memo, IG report, entire month of July, fisa report, redacted fisa pages. All things q predicted would be bombshells and all turned out to be duds.

Q seems to have an excellent understanding of the surveillance scandal involving the trump campaign, and has consistently been ahead of the curve with that topic. Between that, his accurate predictions (Flynn, SA, NK) and the timing between his posts and trumps tweets and misspellings, I throughly believe there’s more to this story than just a LARP. He’s been very consistent in his topics of conversation, and events seem to be following his “narrative” for lack of a better word very closely.

Not really. Just because you WANT to believe something that's been proven to be a lie doesn't mean it's true

No, you’re right. The fact that he’s made several accurate predictions is what makes it credible.

What? Tippy Top? If you did real research you’d know Trump has used that phrase before. Every major thing he’s talked about has turned out to be nothing. Nunes memo? Bullshit. IG Report? The day before it dropped he said it was a fake so that when it inevitably turned out to not be the earth shattering event he said it was, just like the nunes memo, month of March, April, and other predictions, he wouldn’t be questioned. But wait there’s more!

When Trump nixed the FISA memo he immediately started damage control. If Q was a high level insider he would’ve known Trump was gonna nix it. Especially since Trump said he nixed it for now “upon counsel from the DOJ”.

The guy is a fraud. And that’s without getting into his more insane stuff like missile launches and Hillary Clinton being arrested, or the supposed torture tape that was supposed to be released... but it’s been almost a year, where is it?

If you throw 50 things at the wall and a few manage to stick that doesn't really translate to credibility.

The problem with Q is that he is making trump supporters blindly trust sessions, when Trump has publicly blasted Sessions multiple times.

So is it a psyop by Sessions supporters? Is it part of Trump's plan to get Dems to support Sessions? What is it then?

Question everything

Except Trump.

"Trust Trump" -Q

Trump: "i hate sessions"

Q: "except that"

It think Q's implication is the Trump/Sessions "animosity" is theatre.

Can he be a Larp and a Psyop at the same time? It seems to me that it is a more of a deliberate Psyop feeding one narrative to what is going on that isn't the narrative CNN, WaPo, and the NY Times along with others share.

I completely agree with you, here’s my take on it. Pasted from other thread.

This is a psy-op that is playing the horse/carrot trick on the conspiracy/truthers/autists/trump supporters etc. They are dragging the “cause you’d be in jail” on and on and on. “The Happening” is always “just around the corner”, instead of actually paying attention to what is going on politically, they are drawn to small clues that Trump is putting out, but none of the actual important happenings have come to be, none!

I will admit that I find/found it quite interesting, it’s like a thriller, suspenseful, clues are given, research is required. It’s fun, and again, very interesting maybe even plausible. I definitely don’t think the subs should have been banned, that’s ridiculous.

The other thing that really threw me off with Q was the fact that they regurgitated the Mainstream 9/11 narrative.

I’ll keep an open mind, but if none of “the happenings” have happened by early next year, I’ll be 100% convinced it’s nothing but a trick.

With that said, Q, same as the Trump movement got a lot of people questioning things and talking about things that otherwise would have been reserved for the conspiracy forums. So wether or not either of them are legit, maybe the worm is out of the can or whatever and this sparked a mass awakening, it will be interesting to see at what point people either realize they were duped or just fall back in line again, or maybe “the happening” is just around the corner?

It has nothing to do with Q per se. It has everything to do with "your either with the left ChiCom Socialists, or your against them". So you either vote Democrat or your an enemy of the Left.

As for Q, the trail has already been established and its not a military operation with "Q" clearance. Its a small group of Americans who have provoked thought and research. Q proofs are not 100% proof of anything. They've been doxxed. Your best bet is to view it as a pro American research project for truth. Inspect what you inspect, its your best bet. Research yourself and stop trusting others. Its a skillset we all desperately need to navigate the current state of affairs.

This q shit is a ploy by reddit to kick off censorship.

Next week I will be releasing a lengthy unbiased analysis of the Q phenomenon. I am not a qultist or right wing at all but after hundreds of hours of research i can say the evidence is undeniable that Q is real and there is a deep state civil war about to bubble over into the public view.

Anyone interested in it leave me a comment here and I'll tag you when I post it.

Where we go one we go all

please tag me when the time comes, thank you

I'll take a look, if you don't mind

Hook a brother up!

remember me also

stop trying to sell your books on this sub.

Lol this has nothing to do with my book and my book is free?

remember folks: if something is free, you are the product

Counterpoint: I'm already successful so I don't need to profit from my writing

doing what?

Small business owner. Have my own and I'm part owner of a second one. Won't give more details because of internet trolls 😎

Jesus bro i'm not sure why you're getting downvoted, but I look forward to your writeup

Thanks for the comment I appreciate it. It seems like these upvote counts fluctuate by 10 every few hours. I just hope people don't downvote the post I make without reading it just because it's about a controversial topic

I mean, it's a book...not an ad-filled addictive social network

She'll have your purchase information like email name etc

That sick fuck.

let me know too.

I am interested! Thank you - I find it surprisingly hard to really dig into this because I only learned it was a thing when the banhammer hit.

Please tag me

I guarantee I can debunk your best piece of evidence in 5 minutes.

challenge accepted, I'll tag you when I post it.

Me too please😜

witness me

Probably because disinformation is still harmful and because people still believe in it.

So you're saying any subreddit with material from corporate media should be banned?

It seems that way because you took your interpretation of what I said and dragged it all the way to your own extreme.

You're right, yes. But cheering on corporate media's appetite to have the unilateral power of declaring what's "truth" and what's "disinfo" is dangerous.

This sub got banned for "harassment", which is pretty clearly a pretext.

Over the target.

Does it have the same mods from r/greatAwaking?

I'm not sure.

If ppl criticizing you means youre over the target then wha does it mean when trump criticizes hillary?

Dude we have satellites and telescopes that can see every square inch of the moon. If there were aliens there, it would be known by everyone and their mother. This shit is so retarded LOL

yes, which leads to the obvious conclusion that there are aliens there lmfao

The aliens are on the other side of the flat earth!

Can someone explain why people are buying this Q stuff? It sounds soooooo silly.

It sounds soooooo silly

It "sounds". So you haven't read any of it.

Trust Sessions sounds very silly.

Not really, in the context of what Q's implied Sessions' role is.

Which means they didn't read any of it and are just here to say 'it sounds silly'

I wonder why....

Which means you didn't really read any of Q's posts

reality the majority of Q followers don't really know much about Q.

They've read one or two posts or some posts here and there and see you in a couple of "Q proofs"

but they haven't really investigated any of them or really looked into q at all

Would you be able to tell me your take on Q. I'm new to this Q thing and am genuinely interested. What things has Q said that has influenced your take on it? has Q predicted some things that occurred? also what is the main reason behind the ban. was there an incident or something?

​

I'm not asking this in a skeptical way or as a devils advocate, but as someone genuinely interested in this but without much knowledge

My name take is it the people who believe in q typically have only skimmed SOME of his posts.

They haven't really looked into him or even tried to fact check him

They see one or two things that seem like a coincidence and take it as proof.

They read some of his posts occasionally but they don't read all of them or they would know that most of them haven't come true

His very first prediction was a lie. That Hillary was going to be arrested. That didn't happen

Since then hes alternated between being a right wing political commentator on the news and making predictions that font come true

the majority of the people that believe him like at the same types of people who can be fooled by fake psychics. They make vague statements that tell you what you want to hear and people will readily believe it

How do you know she wasn't arrested?

Because she is still out in the world doing things.

That's a lot of statement with zero specifics and zero indication that you have ready Q's posts.

I've read a bunch of them, they are all open-ended, vague, nonsense. Q is about as believable as John Edwards cold reading, or any other fortune teller/astrologer. There's a simple psychological trick that has been commonly associated with the circus showman P.T. Barnum, often called the "Barnum," or "Forer," effect, where a person makes a statement to a large crowd that somehow seems personal or relatable to individuals within the group because of how they interpret the statement. Q believers have simply been decieved by this exploit in human psychology.

https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Barnum_effect

"It never pays a prophet to be too specific" -Robert Anton Wilson

Is there some evidence you could provide that backs up your theory?

Trump gives a lot of subtle references that he actually is Q.

Q is the 17th letter of the alphabet... last night Q posts a picture in Las Vegas on 8chan 17 seconds before Trump tweets (he was in Las Vegas for a rally)

Trump also invited a radio show host who analyzes Q to the white house. Why the fuck would he do that?

Q posted a few pics from AF1.

People asked Q, in April, when we would have a MOAB. Q responded, 'red carpet event' and clarified it as the Emmy awards. Then, whaddya know, trump ordered FISA to be declassified on the night of the emmy awards, the 17th day of September.

R/conspiracy has been overrun with shills. People that talk about Q here have no idea wtf they are talking about and they juggle back and forth between it being a 'psyop' or a 'LARP'

As someone who has followed Qs posts since the beginning, it is not a LARP. Trump is involved. The purpose of Q is to wake people up to the illegal things done by previous admin and FISC.

Have a look for yourself https://qmap.pub/

Yes trump definitely timed out exactly 17 seconds on the dot as a reference to the alphabet in the hopes someone would point it out and "confirm" this conspiracy theory that hhes suspiciously not confirmed on twitter himself

People buy it because believing the idea that the idiot they voted for is actually a savior fighting an evil network of pedophiles is a lot more comforting than accepting the reality that he's an amoral, corrupt buffoon and they were suckers for voting for him.

he's an amoral, corrupt buffoon and they were suckers for voting for him.

Literally every president since Carter

Go read all of Qanons posts and do some of your own research if you really want to know. Don't blindly follow what people in this sub say.

If that many people are "buying this Q stuff", don't you think there's actually something to it?!

He's proven himself legit, repeatedly.

Q_Drops was banned because it was clearly just GA v20. When you have the same users remaking the same subs, it doesn't take much to figure out. Now, if you wanted to restart GA, just wait a month and do it then. Everytime a sub gets banned for doxxing, you'll see a successful copy appear a short time later. Incels turned into /r/Braincels , FPH turned into /r/fatlogic , etc. Hell, that's how GA was made in the first place. Remember CBTS_stream or whatever it was called? It was made by the same people who apparently can't learn to stop harassing people. And yes, they were pretty blatant about it.

That harassment was on Twitter, not reddit.

Also, your post has just proven that banning a whole sub (not an individual) for doxxing is illogical. If we assume that the admins are logical then all the Q subs must have been banned for other reasons, and the only connection is the discussion of Qanon.

Q.E.D.

Or its just a corporation doing what it needs to to limit liabikity and not a step more.

This is effectively where the harassment started. Evidently the twitter user was aware of the connections between the harassment and the subreddit, as he went there directly to ask them to stop, only to get his post removed. All the little details are expanded upon here , although as the sub has been deleted so I'd recommend using it in conjunction with the Wayback Machine (neither removeddit nor ceddit work on deleted subs).

The admins' reasons for doing anything is ultimately just for good pr. If they were serious about getting rid of rule breaking subs, reddit would be a whole different place right now. It's easier to prove a connection between a deleted sub and a new sub if the new one was created within a week after the old one, than it would be if it was a month or two later. This way, the admins can say "eh, we tried" and focus on more important matters, like making us all go blind via the redesign.

While not required, you are requested to use the NP (No Participation) domain of reddit when crossposting. This helps to protect both your account, and the accounts of other users, from administrative shadowbans. The NP domain can be accessed by replacing the "www" in your reddit link with "np".

I am a bot, and this action was performed automatically. Please contact the moderators of this subreddit if you have any questions or concerns.

That is the thing, it seems crazy to delete subs and not users, barring of course a racisist or hate type sub. I am sure shills posted on Q subs with inciteful speech, as they do in other subs, but I never saw those messages and was there often and from day 1. If Reddit wants a sub removed, or topic, they will find a way. Social engineering.

And what about posting Q topics here? Is the Q topic off limits? Crazy stuff.

who apparently can't learn to stop harassing people

Nonsense. There are subs like /r/TopMindsOfReddit/ that brigade and mock/harass, but they're totes cool.

And if there's ever a cult-like devotion to doxx and send death threats, message the admins and let them know.

He just told you a sub that does all those things. Openly. They are protected by the admins.

So, the admins are protecting both TMOR and t_d? Seems odd. Why would they do that?

They're protecting TMOR. They're tolerating t_d. T_d is not supported by the admins. Don't get it twisted. It's always on the verge of one small slip up and they can shut it down.

TMOR on the other hand actively targets individual users with targeted harrassment and doxing and the admins know and simply close their eyes to it.

Alright, I'll bite. Why are they protecting TMOR/tolerating t_d? t_d was just as guilty of spamming that racist Serena comic as MDE or ChadRight, yet when the co-founder's banwave targeted those subs, t_d was left untouched. Who do you think kept it alive?

I could see "targeting individual users" as targeted harassment, but that's more of an issue with meta subs in general. TMOR, SRD, drama, SPS, SSS, SRS, etc would be banned under that rule, so it's clear that's not the admins' interpretation of it. But doxxing? The only "example" I can find is a claim that they doxxed the CBTS mods, but the only information used was stuff publicly given in an interview.

Do you have any evidence you'd like to link that shows TMOR doxxing?

GA?

GreatAwakening

What I find fascinating, and noticing is that these Q people haven’t been violent or anything. They have questioned why the ban etc, as well as, add some pretty good content and stories here.

It’s the anti-q crowd that seems to be the agitators and provocateurs. You see anyone question Q or bring it up and there comment or post is downvoted to oblivion.

If there's one thing that gives hillary some credence it's the way q team is so desperately trying to silence her.

Other way around.

I guess I am not following you? How are they trying to silence her? I see her talking all over the place, and she even has a new book out.

It makes me wonder why The_Donald hasn't been banned yet. Everything related to that sub has been taken down. But the admins let T_D stand. I have a theory.

I believe someone is using it as controlled opposition. Now many people on T_D are real conservatives or libertarians. I'll admit I post on there all the time as I share a lot of views with some of the posts. But a lot of times I see comments that suggest actions that would hurt us politically and socially with a ton of upvotes.

Now bare with me, I'm just speculating here. I saw an investigation from a far left sub that found numerous Russian websites and owners that are involved with T_D. The Reddit staff deleted the post (allegedly) and still let T_D stand. I'm sure if you look into left leaning subs there will be Russian involvement as well. Not to mention Chinese on BOTH sides.

The American people, left or right, are being played, and played well. They are driving a wedge between the country over the internet, and both sides seem to be missing it because they are so obsessed with catching the other team slippin'. This is the new age of warfare I think. It's so complex it keeps me up at night.

I promise you I'm trying to be bipartisan. I'm tired of hating fellow Americans. We need to compromise, something the elite/deep state fear.

How many strikes should this qult get? When r/CBTS_Stream was banned, it was because they routinely called for violence, public hanging of political enemies, and targeted harassment of users on reddit and Twitter. This banning apparently taught the qult nothing about civility because they displayed the exact same behaviors with an even larger subscriber count. r/greatawakening had more than enough opportunities to get their act together and their mods refused to do anything about the doxxing, inciting violence, and harassment. Instead they played dumb and said "we've investigated ourselves and found no evidence of wrong doing." Nobody is afraid of Q. They're afraid of the real world consequences of mentally ill people who believe in a FUCKING 4/8chan LARP. Hurr durr gotta disseminate super classified info to patriots better go to a basket weaving forum

it was because they routinely called for violence, public hanging of political enemies

People wanting the justice process to end in capital punishment is a far cry from people calling for extrajudicial violence.

and targeted harassment of users on reddit and Twitter

Lots of communities spawn dogpiling.

doxxing, inciting violence, and harassment

GA was a chill sub. You disagree with them so you're fearmongering, that's all.

They're afraid of the real world consequences of mentally ill people who believe in a FUCKING 4/8chan LARP

Declaring people with different opinions mentally ill is silly.

They did call for extrajudicial violence, the dog piling was not inadvertent, and if you believe the president is communicating to you through typos, capitalizations, and gematria, you are mentally ill.

They did call for extrajudicial violence

Not that I ever saw and I was there a lot.

the dog piling was not inadvertent

One guy got dogpiled on Twitter. Crappy, but not the end of the world.

if you believe the president is communicating to you through typos, capitalizations, and gematria, you are mentally ill.

Not everyone was into that aspect of Q and there are people into this kind of stuff on this sub as well, yet here you are.

You deserve applause for not allowing yourself to get baited. I have so much respect for your reasonable responses. You're exactly the kind of Redditor I try to be.

Thank you! Oh, on my bad days I get baited hard. I'm feeling kind of chill today and it feels nice. It probably won't last though haha. Cheers, mate!

People wanting the justice process to end in capital punishment is a far cry from people calling for extrajudicial violence.

BS! I was on that sub. There were posts all the time about hanging people. Celebrated.

GA was a chill sub. You disagree with them so you're fearmongering, that's all

Again BS. I alerted mods many times to posts that was doxxing and could get the sub banned.

There were posts all the time about hanging people.

As a method of capital punishment, not as extrajudicial violence.

I alerted mods many times to posts that was doxxing and could get the sub banned.

Perhaps, but they certainly took measures again doxing... you couldn't put a linkedin.com link in comments, etc.

BS! I was on that sub. There were posts all the time about hanging people. Celebrated.

Have you been on /r/politics ? Reminding everyone that Trump should be hung for treason is par for the course there, let’s see when they get banned for it. How about /r/latestagecapitalism discussing who is worthy of the gulag?

Reminding everyone that Trump should be hung for treason is par for the course there

Like hell it is. Point me to an upvoted comment where someone calls for Trump to be hanged?

/r/shitpoliticssays

As someone who frequents /r/politics , I can tell you it happens quite often

I was just invited to that sub a couple of hours ago!! When perusing I wondered how long it would take for it to be shut down.

New Jailbait and Fatpeoplehate subs would get banned just as quickly.

No Qanon subs is Reddit policy. Trying to make new ones isn't going to change their mind or work any better.

Relevant Reddit TOS

We reserve the right to modify, suspend, or discontinue the Services (in whole or in part) at any time, with or without notice to you. Any future release, update, or other addition to functionality of the Services will be subject to these Terms, which may be updated from time to time. You agree that we will not be liable to you or to any third party for any modification, suspension, or discontinuation of the Services or any part thereof.

"Best" comment in a conspiracy sub defends censorship with quoted TOS.

There's a conspiracy.

Do you think that because you called out a comment the admins lowered the votes on this post?

Obviously spez is following his account around hoping he doesn't put all the pieces together. Godspeed eleminnop, hope you can stay a few steps ahead.

They don't need to lower votes.

Admins can literally drag and drop any thread wherever they want.

Problem is when they do this, it's obvious, like I pointed out, since votes and number of comments don't make sense.

So you think the admins are manipulating this thread but stopped because you called it out?

That is exactly what I'm saying, and yes, I know how "improbable" that sounds.

Cannibals like spez get off on that kind of irony.

The fact you don't think they read any of this stuff makes them want to read it even more.

Gotta think like a spez to catch a spez (;

That's a wonderful bit of insane logic. Because it's so improbable, they must be doing it because they get off on it.

You think that's more likely than the possibility that maybe you don't understand how people actually vote.

I would not say that /u/joey_bosas_ankles is defending censorship. He did not say that what the admins is good or wrong. He only explained what reddits policy is by quoting the TOS and by providing previous examples.

Q was a discordian and the jokes on you if you were dumb enough to pick up the apple.

That is a very good question.

I knew zero about Q until all this drama started and this morning paid a buck for a Q Drops app so I can see what all the fuss is about.

If the goal was to avoid "infecting the public," mission failed. We just got more curious.

The censorship is pretty shoot in the foot stupid.

the so called 51K inditements are BS until they are uncovered. There is no reason something that large needs concealment from the public. Just fucking come out with it already otherwise it's just pulling everyone's chain.

I've had enough of the secrecy, after Q said July would be "no more secrets" and it's still "trust the plan" bullshit while sheepdogging Likud talking points and herding people to the corrupt as fuck Republicans. for a so called non partisan entity Q certainly is acting like a partisan hack.

Regardless no one or sub should be censored because you don't agree with them.

Its because they think they should think for you.

Its not good for you redditor.

This turned up in my feed and I’m asking respectfully: who or what is Q? What does it/they do? And why were they/it banned. Thank you and have a lovely evening

Its a conspiracy theory that motivated a guy to shoot up a pizza parlor

For real?

Because this is also a psyop intended to give the Q psyop more credibility. This ZOMGSOSOOPEECREDIBULS!! thing is getting old.

You know what would give this thing more credibility? High level arrests. Public trials. Cessation of foreign aggression. Stop fucking up Syria, Nicaragua, Venezuela. Not bullshit "oh but things are changing behind the curtains! Just you wait! Trust the planrz!! " Won't happen, cuz this is all a game.

Andy McCabe is currently facing a Grand Jury

Do you understand what that means?

James Comey, Director – FIRED Andrew McCabe, Deputy Director - FIRED Jim Rybicki, Chief of Staff and Senior Counselor – FIRED James Baker, General Counsel – FIRED Bill Priestap, Director of Counterintelligence (Strzok’s boss) – Cooperating witness [power removed] Peter Strzok, Deputy Assistant Director of Counterintelligence – FIRED Lisa Page, Office of General Counsel – FIRED/FORCED Mike Kortan, Assistant Director for Public Affairs – FIRED Josh Campbell, Special Assistant to Comey – FIRED

Laufman, Chief of the Justice Department’s Counterintelligence and Export Control Section [NAT SEC - HRC email invest] - FIRED/FORCE John Carlin, Assistant Attorney General – Head of DOJ’s National Security Division - FIRED/FORCED Sally Yates, Deputy Attorney General & Acting Attorney General - FIRED Mary McCord, Acting Assistant Attorney General – Acting Head of DOJ’s National Security Division - FIRED/FORCED Bruce Ohr, Associate Deputy Attorney General – Demoted 2x - cooperating witness [power removed] - TERMINATION IMMINENT Rachel Brand, Associate Attorney General – No. 3 official behind Deputy AG Rosenstein - FIRED/FORCED Nothing to See Here.

And the FISA is going to be declassified.

When was the last time North Korea launched a missile?

> Its funny how desperate and spooked the deep state Illuminati cabal is

​

You've got to be kidding

Q: Trust Sessions while he takes away your marijuana.

I remember when LARP just meant dudes St the park play fighting. Now people took that term along with 'trolling' and have given it a completely new highjacked meaning.

If you justify all the banning, fear and hate because of an anonymous 4chan poster then you are weak human being.

Q (tip) is a brilliant name, just the name alone tells you he's the real steal!

Moon Landings? Now I remember...always thought they were carried out in a lake...maybe one with supercooled water and no movement in the water whatsoever...silly of me really.

I'm a bot, bleep , bloop . Someone has linked to this thread from another place on reddit:

• [ /r/betternews ] Q_Drops Sub banned today after going public. Cited "Harrassment" is a blatant cover to censor any Q related discussions. Why so spooked over a supposed LARP or Psyop?

• [ /r/iowaconservative ] Q_Drops Sub banned today after going public. Cited "Harrassment" is a blatant cover to censor any Q related discussions. Why so spooked over a supposed LARP or Psyop?

  ^{If you follow any of the above links, please respect the rules of reddit and don't vote in the other threads. ( Info / Contact )}

Q is a larp for the not-so-bright.

But it's getting ridiculous banning all discussion of it as "harrassment"

If larpers want to larp and not hurt anyone (as this sub was doing) then let it be.

Why didn’t they just ban the aggressive, harassing users? Assholes show up in many subs and the report/ban method seems to work there.

I’m scared they’ll try to do that here. I’d even volunteer as a mod to help clear out the bad apples.

That was the mods' job. To ban the troublemakers. Instead, then encouraged them.

It blows my mind this sub supports GA doxxing but CNN not doxxing is somehow outrageous enough to ban the whole domain on here.

I was there and I watched the s8n drama go down. It's summarized here so I'm not sure why you feel the need to lie about it.

So you didn't even bother to read the post, then. Got it!

I have no dog in this fight, but your question in the title is the answer to that question. You reason that the powerful resistance of the Q movement is proof it isn't a LARP, have you considered the opposition is to further convince you isn't a LARP to give it credibility?

it was banned for "harrassment".

It's ban evasion.

Lol I can hear the rage froth as you type this...Reddit owns everything you post here, if they wanna take it down they can.

Literally no one in the government or media gives two shits about Q and the qultists, outside of domestic terrorism units, and its hardly ever mentioned in the news outside of being banned from Trump rallies because of mental instabilities, and how terrible this looks for trump when these people show up in Q shirts. This was a joke from the start posting on a Japanese image board to teenagers. I'm lmfao at the concept honestly. Next it became a LARP for teenies and eventually the Boomers, and now a 100% Psyop from foreign actors to fucking enrage psychotic people to further destabilize the country, and you've been had and are actively contributing to the demise of the United States. I hope that makes you feel real fucking good, commie.

I'm sorry, but if you had any understanding of what Q clearance is, and how few people hold it, the "deep state" would have rooted this person or group out instantly. You have clearly never gone through the ropes for even a low level clearance. Cognitive dissonance sucks is a real mother fucker.

This Q shit screams religious cult, I should fucking know, I was deprogrammed after growing up in one my entire life. Seek help.

msm ignores q

Proof q is real!

msm debunks q

Proof q is real!

msm says q is real

Proof q is real!

Cult

Thats why u fear hillary

That's why you fear Q.

That's why you fear that this is actually a larp.

LOL there's NO fear here. I know exactly where things are going, and that was well before Q. :)

Also you dont seem to understand how cults work. Seeing as Q pushes unity, researching things yourself, and also encourages love compassion and finding corruption and truth together. Im sorry but youve been complety mislead and it shows. good luck!

Wow, you are just a textbook example. Love, unity, compassion! This is literal mind control and you have been conned.

First read this, but replace references to god with Q... http://applygodsword.com/signs-of-a-cult-leader/

Then read this: https://www.cultwatch.com/howcultswork.html

Seriously, don't just throw it to the side because it doesn't fit your narrative. Q followers are opened minded to all information right? If you wont read these then you aren't actually open minded.

What a shitty cult

Atleast you admit it.

Let me guess Q is exposing corruption and treason of crooked Hillary and the Democrats right? Nothing Trump or the GOP has verifiably done right?

You act like you're some enlightened individual on secret information but you are nothing but a Sheep, and its gonna fucking hurt your head when you find out that Trump wasn't actually working to take down anything but his own presidency because hes such a complete bumbling incompetent idiot.

When you get older you'll understand these things better, but for now, no one can prove you are wrong and you actually listen. You'll have to find that out on your own. Good luck, you'll need it!

even though I think the Q cult is more or less full of loonies, I still hate the fact that they are censored on this piece of shit site

When the blue goose

Flies at midnight

Angela Merkel’s disjointed cankles

will rupture

gravy pouring everywhere

347.72 - 12 = 5

Trump will win

Shiver me timbers

Potato 🥔

Spread this message

Q

Again, who cares if anyone believes it. There are flat earth subs and other crazy conspiracy subs. Not banned.

Any mention of the Q posts....banned.

If you want harassment, just post "I love the President" in r/worldnews and r/politics. You will be called everything from a fucking idiot to a goddamn retard.

Yea I don’t, get it. If he isn’t a threat why is he banned? This def gives, Q more credit.

It could still be some crazy psyop, as the major huge predictions haven’t happened but god damn does, it feel like they’re legit and coming soon.

Reverse psycology? Bring in more believers? Is q considered the "radical right?" I mean, if someone wants everybody to really fight, what better way than to divide, then, create an entity that will appeal to a demographic. Make the entity seem very mysterious and cryptic and benevolent, yet censor it and ridicule it on the msm. It just seems like psychology 101, manipulation level 98. If I'm wrong I have no problem eating my words.

Simple explanation... Platforms like reddit don't want to be responcible for any blowback that comes from the Q community

Complex explication... Look at pizzagate. A crazy conspirty theory involving a pizza shop and a pedophile ring motivated a guy to enter the establishment with a gun and shoot the place up to protect children. Now apply this to Q.. What happens if all the conspiracy talk about the deep government motivated some individual to take a shot at Nancy Pelosi or Dick Cheney whomever the current suspected grand wizard is. The news headlines will be Q conspiracy theorists ok the website reddit just like info wars got painted with the pizza gate conspiracy. Look how well things are turning out for Alex Jones after that.

Right now it is off limits. I have wondered if it is actually more complicated then we imagine. To discount Q based on 1 area he won‘t question is reaching. He tells people to think for themselves and use logic. That is Telling.

All the good comments in here getting downvoted and vice versa.

New mods already operating in full swing.

Define your version of "pretty much" and "extrajudicial" in relation to what he said.

What does the vote being along party lines have to do with trusting sessions?

"if theres one thing that makesbit credible its how people keep debunking it. If it wasnt real noone would be proving it wrong" smh

If there's one thing that gives "Russian vollusion" some credence it's the way red team is so desperately trying to silence it.

How to deal with groups committing wrongthink:

1. Label them alt-right or Nazis
2. Claim they’re all actively calling for violence even though it’s a small minority that’s often downvoted or ostracized from the group. 2.5 Get some dipshits to post ‘totally legit proof’ that the sub is a ticking time bomb, encouraging political violence. Usually includes posts as “proof” with little to no upvotes or single comments with hidden scores.
3. Ban the sub

downvote for asking for source lol

Streisand effect. Its all planned to pacify the people yearning for anti establishment embelishments and the safety of groupthought.

Actually it did. This q nonsense is just a more unhinged extension of pizzagate

Q didn't exist when that incident happened. You can't rationally blame it on Q.

Frisco I do blame the Democrats movement for inspiring it.

Should Democrats be banned from social media?

But even if you don't you can't deny that the q nonsense ditectly i spired people to arm themselves and take action

Q, like Bernie, has never advocated anything other than normie political participation. You're employing guilt-by-association, a fallacy.

Theres more but im not going thru all. But they exhibit all the signs

You are misrepresenting the things you claim it checks off.

For example:

"The group displays excessively zealous and unquestioning commitment to its leader" is, in full, "The group displays excessively zealous and unquestioning commitment to its leader and (whether he is alive or dead) regards his belief system, ideology, and practices as the Truth, as law ".

"Questioning dissent are discouraged or even punished" is the only valid one.

It's absurd to claim Q is a cult.

But all of the things they're accusing Obama of occurred when he was President. Oddly enough they/the Rs now seem to believe a President(donnie) is incapable of committing a crime/being held accountable. Weird. Those 'beliefs' apparently got put on hold for B.Clinton as well. And as if it isn't transparent enough--they actually seem to take issue with anyone pointing out the blatant hypocrisy of it all.

In what world is dragging politicians into the street legal? I frequently saw references to a "day of the rope"

Most commenters were not wishing for a fair and civil trial. They were wishing that Obama and other democrats be killed and that's it.

That's why you fear that this is actually a larp.

That's pretty interesting you say that. Anyone with kids.

I have 3 kids.

They are not entertaining to old people.

My parents can't watch all 3 kids for more than a couple hours, because they are not entertaining, they are work.

Around a pool? Are you frickin kidding me man?

You and the others that have responded to me defending this evidence as nothing to see, why are you doing that?

What is your motivation?

What if these children were being abused?

You just don't give a shit?

There is nothing wrong with taking about this and asking for an investigation.

Brett Kavanaugh's accuser can call for a FBI investigation after 30 years and zero evidence, no crime scene, no emails, no crime reported?

But this, this is definitely nothing guys. Especially considering Hillary's ties to Bronfman and NXIVM, Laura Silsby in Haiti, the massive fraud that was Haiti. Nothing to see here. Kids as entertainment. Pathetic you are.