Why are we still hearing about the Russian Boogeyman silliness?
0 2018-03-06 by BanMikePantsNow
Then, Clinton was complicit in the obvious sabotage of Bernie Sanders campaign.
Hillary routinely and publicly refered to the lower classes as "deplorables.
The Wikileaks Podesta email dump further confirmed that globalist billionaires owned her and dictated foreign policy to her.
How does any maintain a straight face and claim that Russian boogeymen stole the election?
106 comments
1 AnalgesicSonar 2018-03-06
Low energy post.
1 BanMikePantsNow 2018-03-06
And yet the facts are not disputed.
1 TooManyCookz 2018-03-06
THE STRAWMAN CHRONICLES
1 Symbiotx 2018-03-06
I dunno, it's almost like there's an ongoing investigation or something...
1 BanMikePantsNow 2018-03-06
Yes, there has been one since the election with no meaningful results. It is almost like the "investigation" is a political witchhunt.
1 hangingonbya--thread 2018-03-06
Multiple confessions... But whatever does not fit your narrative so...
1 BanMikePantsNow 2018-03-06
Confessions to trivialities. We started with Russian hackers, progressed to Russian colluders, and now we are worried about Russians posting mean things on social media.
1 JoeyBulgaria 2018-03-06
do you think they aren’t still investigating the hacking and collusion?
1 tainted_waffles 2018-03-06
Has the FBI/DOJ been able to access the DNC computer system? Until that happens, there's no way this investigation can be considered legitimate.
1 SJWPussyLibtard 2018-03-06
This is bullshit. If you know anything about computers, the FBI never needed to dust off the actual server. It doesn't do anything for them. Getting the forensic evidence is all they ever needed to do.
1 hangingonbya--thread 2018-03-06
These are not trivial issues. Sanctions have been lifted, reports are coming out about meddling with our cabinet. Kushner and Trump are peddling access and profiting of the presidency. The Clinton's we're not great people but a Putin backed Trump is significantly worse. If any of you Trump supporters had bothered to read your history books, you would understand that the ex-head of the KGB used tryed and true tactics to undermine our democracy. THAT IS BIG FUCKING DEAL.
1 slamdunkmyjunk 2018-03-06
But that goes against my narrative?? Shouldn't we be talking about evil Hillary and misunderstanding the nuance when she says public and private positions?
1 hangingonbya--thread 2018-03-06
Hillary is no saint. She also is no longer in power. Investigate the fuck out of her too, for all I care. I am significantly more concerned about the current puppet regime in POWER. Who at every turn seems to make, at best, ethically challenged choices and at worst illegal choices.
1 slamdunkmyjunk 2018-03-06
Yes but like Sessions says when Trump demands him to reopen the case into Hillary, there is not enough evidence to do so. And she's been the target of endless investigations already.
1 hangingonbya--thread 2018-03-06
Do you honestly think Jeff Sessions, of all people, would not open an investigation into Hillary Clinton if he had the evidence to justify it? Or is it more likely that he has looked at all the evidence and decided it was not worth reopening. And again, I am more concerned with possible crimes committed by a sitting President, who has questionable connections.
1 slamdunkmyjunk 2018-03-06
We're on the same page friend.
1 saintcmb 2018-03-06
but he is our friend! way nicer than those FBI jerks /s
1 politicalconspiracie 2018-03-06
Average length of Special Counsels
The average length is 1,154 days.
The White Water special counsel took about 3,000 days.
1 ShinigamiSirius 2018-03-06
Thing is, White Water started with a crime.
This "investigation" is a literal witch hunt headed by people complicit in expanding surveillance and supporting the USA's illegal wars, just to name a few things.
1 politicalconspiracie 2018-03-06
Doesn't matter if it was started with a crime or not.
The point is that special counsels or investigations take a long time, and this one is actually moving at break neck speed compared to the rest.
There have been around 16 special counsels/investigations. White Water was just one of them.
1 ShinigamiSirius 2018-03-06
And what have they found? Standard shady deals with oligarchs and a troll farm founded by a catering restaurant owner.
On the other hand, anyone who goes against the Establishment is now labelled a Russian agent, including Bernie and Jill Stein supporters.
1 Bailythebedbug 2018-03-06
Have you been to law school? You just saw its only been half the time of the whitewater investigation. They have more people that are felons and cooperating that whitewater ever got. To set up a case, especially against a sitting president, it has to be air tight. So when Mueller brings charges even the biggest skeptics can see the evicidence clearly. If all the collusion charges were shown to be correct and they had evidence would you still believe or no?
1 ShinigamiSirius 2018-03-06
Yes, if they have actual, independently verifiable evidence, of which there is none, I will happily accept it.
All I see now is corrupt individuals investigating other corrupt individuals. It started with "he's a Manchurian candidate!" and it's now at an insignificant troll farm founded by a catering restaurant owner and some standard corruption charges.
1 politicalconspiracie 2018-03-06
What we know is only what has been leaked out to the public.
We don’t know everything that they know.
I think there is a reason why Gowdy has done a complete 180 once he saw all the underlying evidence
1 ShinigamiSirius 2018-03-06
Again, you are putting your trust in equally corrupt, if not more, individuals in the IC to carry out this investigation, on the hope that they "might" have something, disregarding their track record.
That is absolute madness.
1 politicalconspiracie 2018-03-06
Ok.
1 Symbiotx 2018-03-06
It's not madness, it's waiting for the results of an investigation before calling it. Seems pretty simple to me.
1 Quexana 2018-03-06
This started with a crime. Hacking is a crime.
1 ShinigamiSirius 2018-03-06
No it wasn't. It was started with an accusation that was backed with no evidence.
1 Quexana 2018-03-06
Data stolen from the DNC ending up on Wikileaks is pretty strong evidence that there was a data theft.
1 ShinigamiSirius 2018-03-06
Great speculation you got there. Still no evidence of a hack.
You can repeat talking points ad nauseum, but that doesn't make something true.
1 Quexana 2018-03-06
Whether you believe Russia hacked the DNC or Seth Rich took the files, either way, a crime was committed. This investigation started with a crime.
1 Awesomo3082 2018-03-06
The word you're looking for is "leak".
"Leaks" which showed election rigging, and other crimes.
But... OMG RUSSHA!!!
1 Quexana 2018-03-06
If Seth Rich leaked it, it was a crime.
1 Awesomo3082 2018-03-06
Wait... You're acting like it's a mystery that the guy who's password was... password... got his emails stolen?
And it's good to know that actual election rigging isn't important to you. Only the pretend kind, that months of investigations and millions of dollars can't even verify, let alone prove.
1 Quexana 2018-03-06
Even if the guy's password is password (and it wasn't, he was using a Gmail account and Gmail doesn't allow you to use "password" as a password), it's still a crime to hack and steal the data.
If your car is taken with your keys in the ignition, is it not auto theft?
What actual election rigging did the DNC commit? There's no proof that they altered votes or registrations, at least not in the DNC file dump. Between the DNC file dump, the Podesta file dump, and what we've learned from other sources, here's what we know the DNC did.
None of that is election rigging. Most of it is, sadly and unfortunately, legal. Imo it's a clear violation of Article V Section 4 of The DNC's Charter and Bylaws which states:
Raising money and accepting donations from people who believed that the DNC was abiding by that charter while they were, in fact, not abiding by that charter, might be an example of fraud, but that's a civil case. Corporations and non-profits (The DNC is registered as a non-profit) again, sadly and unfortunately, don't usually have people go to prison over fraud and/or violations of their charter and bylaws.
1 Awesomo3082 2018-03-06
Oh.. I'm sorry... Let me be super clever and change this password from "password" to... umm... "p@ssw0rd". There. That'll do nicely. It's even recorded in his very own emails, y'know, right here . Don't worry about the link. I know CNN said it's illegal to have these, but I checked with my lawyer, and I think we'll be alright.
If I leave the keys in the car, and my neighbor steals it, do I get extra money for blaming the russhins? I can see why people would get on board with that.
And handwaving around the structure and legalese of the election rigging doesn't make it not election rigging. Isn't it kinda bizarre that we can froth at the mouth about russhin meddling, or something, when we have actual, institutionalized election rigging, which is perfectly legal as last ng as the web of laws, bylaws, and charters isn't penetrated? You'll sit there and rave about Russia's interference, without the slightest worry that our elections were rigged before the russhins even entered the scene.
1 Quexana 2018-03-06
You seem to think I never said anything about the DNC's bullshit during the primary. You seem to think I didn't just spend paragraphs talking about it today.
Maybe you think we should throw the people who screwed Bernie in prison, just because, but we have laws in this country.
DWS was fired. Brad Marshall was fired. Luis Miranda was fired. Amy Dacey was fired. Donna Brazille is gone. All the top leadership has been removed, and since Tom Perez was named chair, most of the middle leadership has been replaced too. The DNC is pretty much now either new people or elected officials from the bodies of the state chapters. The candidate they cheated in order to help lost. She did not prosper. The public has been made aware of what they did. As a result of what the DNC did, the DNC has pretty much lost most of their donation streams, at least of the small dollar variety, from the most enthusiastic, willing to help, section of their base. They're being sued in several courts for violating their charter & bylaws while accepting donations under that charter.
To what extent the DNC can be held accountable for their actions, they have been held accountable and they are being held accountable.
How much more accountable do they need to be held? What do you think should happen to hold the DNC more accountable before we even start to look at who committed the data thefts?
1 JamesEpep 2018-03-06
Do you not understand how long investigations take? Also I didn’t realize you had access to all of the information of said investigation. Please share with us all the evidence.
1 BanMikePantsNow 2018-03-06
Particilarly when there is no evidence a guilty result is desired. Those investigations take awhile.
1 Anontifa 2018-03-06
Sounds like Benghazi.
1 BanMikePantsNow 2018-03-06
Except that Fast & Furious was so legitimate, that it killed an ATF agent. That is what is known as evidence.
1 Anontifa 2018-03-06
A government official dying in the line of duty does not a scandal make. Have another multi-year investigation about it, you'll get the same result.
1 JamesEpep 2018-03-06
I’m gonna take that as a no you don’t know.
1 BanMikePantsNow 2018-03-06
Actually, you should take it for what it is; the truth.
1 JamesEpep 2018-03-06
I am taking it for what it is. Opinion. When the investigation concludes and they announce no meddling then you can do you happy dance and chants of they got nothing. Until then all you can do is speculate.
1 UnbearablePenguin 2018-03-06
He doesn't understand. Funny thing is, this user likes to say that I'm stupid. 😂
1 jaydwalk 2018-03-06
I️ don’t know if it’s a nothingburger buuut Nixon took 3-4 years to finish up the investigation.
1 SJWPussyLibtard 2018-03-06
Just because you don't give a shit about 20 criminal indictments and Trumps entire cabinet either getting fired or resigning, doesn't mean the rest of the world doesn't think anything meaningful has happened since the beginning of this investigation.
1 afooltobesure 2018-03-06
How about that Hillary arrest?
1 Symbiotx 2018-03-06
Is it over? No? Then you don't know what evidence there is, and you won't until it's over. Why are you trying to get people to dismiss it when we don't even have the results? The least you could do is wait and see.
There's even less evidence of that than there is in this investigation.
1 saintcmb 2018-03-06
yet how many times has Clinton been investigated with no meaningful results? And here we are.
1 IHazNoID 2018-03-06
To control us and keep us in living in fear.. It's a common trend to have a boogeyman it seems to distract us from what the deep state is actually doing. Also look into the uranium one deal Hilary was involved with. article The hypocracy and neglagence is unbelievable.. but you know uhhhmm Russian collusion!
1 AnalgesicSonar 2018-03-06
Ever consider the possibility that Hillary Clinton is that boogeyman, like right here when someone brings her up 18 months after she was last relevant, saying, "STOP LOOKING AT DONALD TRUMP LOOK OVER THERE AT CROOKED HILLARY."
1 IHazNoID 2018-03-06
I don't exactly know what you mean, but I do think she is a boogeyman that has powerful connections and being used as a puppet to push their agendas. The fact the she is a high profile women seems indicate she is innocent and people gravitate towards here because of that. Globalist aren't as smart as they think, honestly to me it seems they are outdated by technology and their time is coming to an end.
1 exkreations 2018-03-06
Are you so easily distracted that someone just mentioning Hillary as a topic of discussion is enough for you to completely lie about how they've presented the facts? Literally no one has said "don't look at Trump" when talking about Hillary except for the people coming into threads about Hillary stating that they find the news distracting. Self-fulfilling prophecy much?
1 AnalgesicSonar 2018-03-06
That's literally the title of this post.
1 BanMikePantsNow 2018-03-06
That was essentially my point: The Russian Boogeyman narrative is being used as the justification for stifling dissent against the globalist oligarchy. Not unlike how terrorist bogeymen were used to eliminate privacy.
1 ShinigamiSirius 2018-03-06
You are correct, but you're gonna have the usual group of people vomiting something about "muh indictments" even though they had nothing to do with "Russian collusion."
1 BanMikePantsNow 2018-03-06
I know. I was curious as to what level of brigading we would see today.
1 ShinigamiSirius 2018-03-06
Oh, just look at my recent comment history to figure that out. ;)
1 paulie_purr 2018-03-06
Trump has strengthened the global oligarchy even moreso than before. Ask Jeff Bezos how much Trump's policies have hurt his portfolio and continued domination of the marketplace.
1 talleyhooo 2018-03-06
How ironic is this statement lol
1 slamdunkmyjunk 2018-03-06
Lol, did you even read what you linked or did you just Google Hillary uranium one one and post the first article you found? You're link basically exonerates her.
1 IHazNoID 2018-03-06
I just used that article as a reference to what I was talking about you're welcome to do your own research, you can't just believe the first thing you see.
1 slamdunkmyjunk 2018-03-06
Actually, any uranium one claims of wrongdoing have been thoroughly debunked. You could just read the article to figure that out.
1 Awesomo3082 2018-03-06
It's just repetition programming. It's to divert from the obvious corruption within our own borders, and point it at an outside bogeyman.
It doesn't matter how silly it is, or how poorly reasoned it is, if it's repeated often enough, people will believe it.
Now say it with me. Spin around in front of the mirror 3 times and say "Bloody russha. Bloody russha. Bloody rusha". Putin will pop out of the mirror to steal your soul and kick your puppy.
1 KarmicEnigma 2018-03-06
Correct me if I'm wrong, but haven't several people - within our borders - been indicted in relation to this investigation?
1 Awesomo3082 2018-03-06
Several people, associated with one person, right?
Or did you think they were gunning after Hillary for all her russhin uranium deals, too?
1 KarmicEnigma 2018-03-06
Honestly, I wouldn't be surprised if she's caught in the crosshairs at some point in this investigation. Washington D.C. is an incredibly incestuous place - it's not like anyone is "associated with one person". Something this sub tends to forget is that corruption hasn't cornered the market on just one political party.
Either way, there is good reason to be concerned with Russia, and anyone thinking we should buddy up with Putin/Russia has been drinking way too much Kool-Aid.
1 Awesomo3082 2018-03-06
She won't be. I guarantee it 100%. Not a single doubt about it. Neither will Obama, McCain, or any of the other high level feds who played with Russia regularly.
This is all an elaborate shitshow to distract from the corruption we have baked in here at home. If the cnn, fox, and nbc followers here applied even 10% of their "concern" about foreign bogeymen and applied it to our own politicians, then we could actually root out some corruption.
But we won't. Because the teevee and internets is brainwashing people through mindless repetition to fear the evil foreign bogeyman.
1 slamdunkmyjunk 2018-03-06
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Felix_Sater
Trump went into the real estate business with this man in 2006, a man who pleaded guilty in 1998 to a stock fraud scheme perpetuated by the Russian Mafia. Real estate is an often used form of money laundering. Guess what year Trump leaked his tax returns? 2005. Coincidence?
1 Awesomo3082 2018-03-06
Hacked the election! It's like the proof we've been looking for for years!
I'm sure Trump is involved in plenty of shady deals. Deals in New York. Russia. Israel. Other countries too, certainly.
Just like every single self serving, bought out politician we have in Washington D.C.
But you have media induced tunnel vision, and can't see the forest through the trees.
1 slamdunkmyjunk 2018-03-06
You're minimizing a very real threat because it goes against your bias. All you'll do is downplay any evidence thrown at you and excuse Trump of wrongdoing by saying "all politicians do it." The investigation is valid, and Russia's information warfare is a serious threat.
You're ignoring the forest and trying to light your own fires that fit your agenda.
1 Awesomo3082 2018-03-06
Minimizing a very real threat? Jesus Christ, our government in D.C. is murdering millions of people all over the planet, overthrowing countries for their own greed, poisoning large swathes of the population, monitoring our every thought, action, and location, and you're gonna sit there and tell me that some potential money laundering setup from 15 years ago is the "real threat". Jesus Christ, people are retarded.
Russia's "information warfare" is completely and utterly dwarfed by anything the U.S. puts out there. Hell, even this conversation is a product of American dis/intel brainwashing Americans through their msm propaganda.
But you keep pretending the problem comes from "over there". The entirety of our own government is rotted to the core, and no amount of russhin
hacking, I mean,election rigging, err..meddling, no...colluding, I mean... whatever it is they're doing to murica, will change the fact that we're under a tyrannical fascist government who will murder anyone who interferes with its petrodollar and state secrets.1 slamdunkmyjunk 2018-03-06
Like that, right there. You're trying to minimize it. Russia's information warfare takes many different paths, and you're pretending that the MSM is just jumping from one to another at will making it up, instead of reporting the news that comes out about it.
You've quickly proven there is no use in arguing with you. I understand our government has flaws, and has done bad things before, but you're just a nut tbh lol. Really? A tyrannical fascist government? Monitoring our every thought and action? I'd love to see what you look like if you could post a picture.
1 Awesomo3082 2018-03-06
Fuck off imbecile. Our government wages wars all over the world. Not disputable. A tyrannical fascist government, shown by it's weaponized propaganda against it's own citizens, and manipulating both party platforms to the point where there is no anti-war, anti-corruption party. Not disputable.
And yes, the phone in your pocket gives the government all of the information it ever wouldn't need about you. This has been proven , and you're gonna sit there and pretend that I'm the nut. We could exchange pictures, but I have no interest in seeing what a mindless zombie baboon looks like.
1 slamdunkmyjunk 2018-03-06
Yup, our tyrannical fascist government, where we have no recourse for getting people out of power. Man if only we had the ability to vote, I hate living under the tyranny that is the United States and Hillary Clinton, our shadow president.
Oh yeah and all those wars where they're just murdering millions of innocent civilians and maliciously poisoning them to advance their petro dollar shadow state globalist agenda.
I'm sorry my friend, but you are nut. You are not arguing from a position of reason-ability. Getting back to the forest for the trees adage, you're actually just rolling around and playing with your own feces while the world spins without you.
1 Awesomo3082 2018-03-06
You are a blind, unthinking fool, who perfectly illustrates everything that's wrong with American citizens. Keep calling me a nut, while you ignore the evil empire murdering people all around the world for the profit of a few people at the top of this pyramid.
I see a lot of shitheads pass through here, so I'm not surprised, but you've managed to become the perfect caricature of the standard American shithead who can't tell where his head ends and his ass begins. Congratulations.
1 slamdunkmyjunk 2018-03-06
Uh huh, whatever helps you validate your inane opinions bud. What is a shithead to you? Someone that doesn't subscribe to the false reality you're presenting? I'm not ignoring an evil empire, I just understand the nuance that is our foreign diplomacy. Unlike you, who has no reasonable understanding of apparently anything.
1 Awesomo3082 2018-03-06
Now there's "nuance" to murder on a global scale. High five, dude. You're a real winner. It takes the mystery out of how so many nazis could have excused Germany's actions, several decades ago. Sprinkle a little "nuance" on it, and it smells delicious.
1 slamdunkmyjunk 2018-03-06
Lol, it always comes around to the Nazis doesn't it.
1 Awesomo3082 2018-03-06
There's a lot of nuance, to finding the right talking points to appeal to mindless zombies. You guys gobble up that "natzi" shit like it's candy.
Go ahead. Laugh off the shame of being one of those unthinking fools who willingly enables murder on an ongoing massive scale.
"Heh heh". "Chuckle chuckle". Feels good, right? "Lol"
1 slamdunkmyjunk 2018-03-06
It doesn't feel good to know there are people so lost like you :( but yes some of your stances and arguments can be humorous.
1 fuckedyourfaceoff 2018-03-06
It's obvious who carries the downvote brigades with them.
u/anontifa and u/SJWpussylibtard
1 TheHeintzel 2018-03-06
How many witness confessions, email threads, confirmed hacking of voting machines, etc. need to be reported for the extreme right to believe this Russian Meddling this isn't just a witch hunt?
This sub used to be where actual conspiracies were talked about, not where political extremists came to deny reality. Can we please get back to JFK, global elitist, 9/11, and the other conspiracies that might actually be valid?
1 BanMikePantsNow 2018-03-06
Well, we haven't had a significant confessions, email threads, or confirmed Russian hacking. What we have now is Russian social media posts which are irrelevant when compared to the CTR/ShareBlue shilling machine.
1 slamdunkmyjunk 2018-03-06
God this is so desperate lol.
1 exkreations 2018-03-06
I know right, you can practically see the media spinning themselves in a fervor trying to keep a hold on the narrative and spotlight away from their inner circle lmao.
1 slamdunkmyjunk 2018-03-06
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Felix_Sater Trump went into the real estate business with this man in 2006, a man who pleaded guilty in 1998 to a stock fraud scheme perpetuated by the Russian Mafia. Real estate is an often used form of money laundering. Guess what year Trump leaked his tax returns? 2005. Coincidence? Donald Jr said around 2011 that a disproportionate amount of their assets were in Russia. Coincidence? These are just the tips of the iceberg that is the Russian investigation. You're foolish to think it's some giant globalist conspiracy.
1 afooltobesure 2018-03-06
No one you’d call “the left” (or I guess you’d call them shills, for some reason) wants the spotlight off of Clinton or anyone else on the left.
Equal punishment for all swamp creatures, to include Clinton, and Trump.
Trump is a bit more pressing since he’s, ya know currently holding the office of President of the United States, Commander in Chief of the US Military *
1 TheHeintzel 2018-03-06
Fox news and npr are part of the ShareBlue/CTR shilling machine too then? Top DHS officials?
You're not a conspiracy theorist, you're a right-wing nutjob. This subreddit is not the place for you
1 SJWPussyLibtard 2018-03-06
Every head of every department that Trump appointed himself will tell you Russia hacked the DNC and Podesta with the same phishing scam. Why do you think they would lie to you? These are Trumps guys.
1 RedYagoda 2018-03-06
Because its all they have. They are clinging on to it for dear life. Even they must realize how ridiculous it all is.
1 slamdunkmyjunk 2018-03-06
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Felix_Sater Trump went into the real estate business with this man in 2006, a man who pleaded guilty in 1998 to a stock fraud scheme perpetuated by the Russian Mafia. Real estate is an often used form of money laundering. Guess what year Trump leaked his tax returns? 2005. Coincidence? Donald Jr said around 2011 that a disproportionate amount of their assets were in Russia. Coincidence? These are just the tips of the iceberg that is the Russian investigation. You're foolish to think it's some giant globalist conspiracy.
1 BanMikePantsNow 2018-03-06
After 44 mins, we have 30 comments to 0 upvotes. Can I get a cut of that sweet Soros payout? After all, I am creating job security.
1 Space_Pecs 2018-03-06
I downvoted you because you're effectively shilling for T_D, and I won't see a cent from anyone.
What a maroon.
1 Anontifa 2018-03-06
You really overplay your hand.
Is the investigation overreaching? Perhaps. Is it turning up far less than was hyped up? Perhaps.
Is it an absolute fake news phony nothingburger distraction bogeyman? No, and when you say it is it comes off as nervous overcompensation.
1 BanMikePantsNow 2018-03-06
It is not a distaraction, it is the excuse used to censor social media, since your puppetmasters appear to be upset that they control the internet like they can teevee.
1 fuckedyourfaceoff 2018-03-06
Hey look, it's left wing hero "anontifa"!
Here to save the day again!
1 rodental 2018-03-06
ZE RUSSIANS ARE COMINK!! VE MUST DEFEND ZE REICH!!!
1 thirdeye72meatman 2018-03-06
Idk, but,CNN wants to interview my dog. He was eyewitness to president Trump having an affair with dozens of women on top of a building. I asked my dog where in the this happened... He said, roof roof. Film at eleven.
1 MrBrownote 2018-03-06
The largest guilty party in regards to meddling in the elections of foreign governments is guess who?
Russia is an amateur compared to????
Since they are the best and greatest nation in history
1 _chaseyola88_ 2018-03-06
It seems to be a pre amble for the coming war w Russia & China. We're already at war w Russia, just in Syria. We here about it so much to get our ears peppered w how bad they are; making it easier to sell a war. There's much more to it for sure. Mostly ties to $$$ but it seems greasing us up is part of the grand plan.
1 BanMikePantsNow 2018-03-06
91 comments/ 0 upvotes in 4 hours. Uncle George is getting his money's worth today. Somebody is bucking for Employee of the Month.
1 slamdunkmyjunk 2018-03-06
It's at 0 upvotes because your post is fucking stupid go back to The Donald.
1 BanMikePantsNow 2018-03-06
And the 91 comments?
1 slamdunkmyjunk 2018-03-06
Because it's controversial and started a bunch of arguments. I've had like ten comments myself but never voted on your post.
1 YoshiTakimatsui 2018-03-06
I just want the new narrative to start already they are dragging this out for as long as they possibly can
1 hangingonbya--thread 2018-03-06
Multiple confessions... But whatever does not fit your narrative so...
1 politicalconspiracie 2018-03-06
Average length of Special Counsels
The average length is 1,154 days.
The White Water special counsel took about 3,000 days.
1 IHazNoID 2018-03-06
I don't exactly know what you mean, but I do think she is a boogeyman that has powerful connections and being used as a puppet to push their agendas. The fact the she is a high profile women seems indicate she is innocent and people gravitate towards here because of that. Globalist aren't as smart as they think, honestly to me it seems they are outdated by technology and their time is coming to an end.
1 JamesEpep 2018-03-06
Do you not understand how long investigations take? Also I didn’t realize you had access to all of the information of said investigation. Please share with us all the evidence.
1 jaydwalk 2018-03-06
I️ don’t know if it’s a nothingburger buuut Nixon took 3-4 years to finish up the investigation.
1 tainted_waffles 2018-03-06
Has the FBI/DOJ been able to access the DNC computer system? Until that happens, there's no way this investigation can be considered legitimate.
1 ShinigamiSirius 2018-03-06
Yes, if they have actual, independently verifiable evidence, of which there is none, I will happily accept it.
All I see now is corrupt individuals investigating other corrupt individuals. It started with "he's a Manchurian candidate!" and it's now at an insignificant troll farm founded by a catering restaurant owner and some standard corruption charges.
1 exkreations 2018-03-06
Are you so easily distracted that someone just mentioning Hillary as a topic of discussion is enough for you to completely lie about how they've presented the facts? Literally no one has said "don't look at Trump" when talking about Hillary except for the people coming into threads about Hillary stating that they find the news distracting. Self-fulfilling prophecy much?
1 SJWPussyLibtard 2018-03-06
Just because you don't give a shit about 20 criminal indictments and Trumps entire cabinet either getting fired or resigning, doesn't mean the rest of the world doesn't think anything meaningful has happened since the beginning of this investigation.
1 hangingonbya--thread 2018-03-06
Hillary is no saint. She also is no longer in power. Investigate the fuck out of her too, for all I care. I am significantly more concerned about the current puppet regime in POWER. Who at every turn seems to make, at best, ethically challenged choices and at worst illegal choices.
1 Awesomo3082 2018-03-06
Wait... You're acting like it's a mystery that the guy who's password was... password... got his emails stolen?
And it's good to know that actual election rigging isn't important to you. Only the pretend kind, that months of investigations and millions of dollars can't even verify, let alone prove.
1 slamdunkmyjunk 2018-03-06
Like that, right there. You're trying to minimize it. Russia's information warfare takes many different paths, and you're pretending that the MSM is just jumping from one to another at will making it up, instead of reporting the news that comes out about it.
You've quickly proven there is no use in arguing with you. I understand our government has flaws, and has done bad things before, but you're just a nut tbh lol. Really? A tyrannical fascist government? Monitoring our every thought and action? I'd love to see what you look like if you could post a picture.
1 afooltobesure 2018-03-06
How about that Hillary arrest?
1 BanMikePantsNow 2018-03-06
And the 91 comments?
1 Symbiotx 2018-03-06
Is it over? No? Then you don't know what evidence there is, and you won't until it's over. Why are you trying to get people to dismiss it when we don't even have the results? The least you could do is wait and see.
There's even less evidence of that than there is in this investigation.
1 saintcmb 2018-03-06
yet how many times has Clinton been investigated with no meaningful results? And here we are.