I guess Project Veritas got some real dirt on wapo coming up
0 2017-11-28 by Wildinvalid
That thread is hilarious to read. Never seen such an All-in shill storm before
0 2017-11-28 by Wildinvalid
That thread is hilarious to read. Never seen such an All-in shill storm before
31 comments
1 WarSanchez 2017-11-28
These threads are even more pathetic tho.
They caught a guy trying to plant fake evidence to defend a pedo.
1 talixansoldier 2017-11-28
Agreed.
1 yellowsnow2 2017-11-28
Why do you say "defend a pedo"? Is it just out right inconceivable that the far left news would possibly run with false sex allegations to effect an on going election? Do we label any attempt to expose just that as "defending a pedo"?
1 Reign_Wilson 2017-11-28
The Washington Post literally was approached with a false sex allegation and did not run it.
1 yellowsnow2 2017-11-28
Only because they saw the chick walk out of the Project Veritas building and got suspicious. Not because they have a single journalistic bone.
1 Reign_Wilson 2017-11-28
So you’re saying the Washington Post won’t run a sex allegation story when they have a reason to believe the allegation is false?
1 pee_tape 2017-11-28
Wrong. They followed her and saw her walk in. Because they were investigating her claim.
1 Loffler 2017-11-28
Someone didn't read the article
1 Wildinvalid 2017-11-28
Reading doesnt necessarily mean believing
1 Loffler 2017-11-28
They only saw her go into the PV office after they confronted her about the GoFundMe page. It's not like they were just hanging out in front of PV and happened to see her go inside. The other poster obviously hasn't read the article based on the way he lays out the series of events
1 WarSanchez 2017-11-28
I mean the only people still defending Moore are the ones that still believe the fake now deleted Twitter account the fake Robo calls that were made under a fake Jewish pseudonym and now this...
1 IBlockShills 2017-11-28
I'm not surprised that you're tired of these threads lmao
1 WarSanchez 2017-11-28
Apparently my pretty level headd centrist ideas are too radical for you
1 Wildinvalid 2017-11-28
Until I get the full story, I wont trust a word the CiA says
1 zwei_und_zwei 2017-11-28
If you are interested in the full story, why do you promote Project Veritas? They never show the full story.
Exhibit A, compare the full video here to the heavily edited video O'Keefe posted (further down in the article).
There is a reason PV never releases the full videos, they would paint a different story.
1 Wildinvalid 2017-11-28
Where did you get the impression I promote them? I just made a prediction of what I think is going down. If wapo got this right I will be surprised. If it turns out this woman was trying to sting PV, I wouldn't. I really dont care about PV at all. This just stinks to high heaven.
1 zwei_und_zwei 2017-11-28
In a fundraising email , Project Veritas call her "our investigative journalist". So no, the woman wasn't working with wapo to try and sting PV.
1 D0NT_TAZE_ME_BRO 2017-11-28
Every time something goes wrong for a conservative -
Guys, looks like this is a big distraction for something bad about to drop for libruls.
Every single time. It's great.
1 rederic 2017-11-28
Also, every single time they catch wind of some real dirt coming up that makes them look bad.
Gaslight
Obstruct
Project
1 Sachyriel 2017-11-28
Do you want to put a date on your prediction? Maybe a bit of a $ wager?
1 Reign_Wilson 2017-11-28
A Conservative group was caught paying women to make false sex allegations to the media and you think this is evidence that they have dirt on the Washington Post?
1 William_Harzia 2017-11-28
Where's the evidence of that? AFAIK all they did was report seeing her walk into the Project Veritas office. By itself that doesn't mean anything. So are you just connecting random dots like a conspiracy theorist?
1 iamthedrag 2017-11-28
Bro James Okeefe already admitted that WaPo busted one of their undercover agents. This isn’t some mystery, the dude admitted to it happening. Def not a conspiracy.
1 Old-neptune 2017-11-28
You should read some of the articles going over what happened before trying to steer discussion on it.
1 abumubarak 2017-11-28
I guess Rumpists are desperatly trying damage control.
Protip: it's not working
1 Wildinvalid 2017-11-28
I know too little about this, but judging by the abnormal upvotes and retarded comments in that thread I think the opposite is closer to the truth
1 PantsMcGillicuddy 2017-11-28
That's painfully obvious. I'd suggest reading up on topic before accusing everyone else of being shills. Maybe you can have a complete picture and have real discussion instead.
Or do you believe that PV is justified in their attempt to push a fake story to defend an alleged pedo? Would seem kinda hypocritical since you seem pretty passionate about pizzagate.
1 Wildinvalid 2017-11-28
My point is, I cant draw any conclusions based in a cia rag upvoted to oblivion by shills. Makes me a little... curious is all
1 PantsMcGillicuddy 2017-11-28
Do you believe every highly upvoted article is by shills? There are tons of Hillary or Podesta things that get as many upvotes and just swarmed with people from T_D. Do you create one of these asking why it was shilled?
1 Wildinvalid 2017-11-28
I know a shillpost when I see one. Including t_d ones
1 hisayo92 2017-11-28
Got an example of a pro-trump post from this sub that you believe is shilling?
1 rederic 2017-11-28
Also, every single time they catch wind of some real dirt coming up that makes them look bad.
Gaslight
Obstruct
Project