It's clear that US govt can fabricate child pornography charges against anyone anytime it wants to take someone down ... and NOBODY is talking about that
Yes this is true. I remember a year or two ago they said that thousands of computers in Homeland Security and other intel agencies were filled with CP. so either they’re all pedos or more probable the computer systems have been compromised to prevent agents from speaking the truth and blowing whistles.
it's the same thing as when during Stalin's time, they accused you of being an "enemy of the people", an allegation thats impossible to disprove if govt presents proof, as there is nobody watching/controlling them - they are the ultimate authority.
literally anything can be fabricated, especially any online communication. if the govt says you wrote something in some online app or chat, and you didn't, there is no way you are going to prove you didn't. it's an insanely dangerous, sad situation.
Good eye. I've realized this for awhile now. It takes nothing to plant child porn on someone's device, computer, or hard drive, and is a nearly indefensible strategy to take down anyone or ruin their life. Sexual assault allegations can be just as Machiavellian as well.
One thing to note about MJ is that his personality traits, regardless of how outlandish they came of, were not the norm of convicted pedophiles. I remember watching a documentary about the psychology of Michael Jackson and several argued that he didn't fit most of nuisance characteristics of child rapists.
Michael Jackson was a totally different personality and lifestyle from any pedophile on record. Michael Jackson doesn't fit any profile, let alone a pedophiles.
Vitiligo. I know people do get there skin treated because of it. Idk if it can change all of your skin though. Everytime I've seen it it's been spotting all over the person. UFC fighter Scott Jorgensen had it but got treatment now he is one color, much lighter than his natural color.
He admitted to sleeping in the same bed as children and giving them alcohol, and settled suits out of court. It’s hard not to connect the dots there even if he was set up in other ways.
Pedophilia is one thing; acting on it is another. But personally, I think he just wanted to 'save' every kid so they don't get fucked up by life. Maybe he crossed some boundaries during that time, but I think it might have been more "creepy uncle" than predator.
that is where I am at with it. Wierd dude, probably crossed some lines and made some mistakes because he is human (not justifying anything) but he might not have been the monster that they painted him as.
I have heard that and I know this will not be well received, but something seems off about Corey too. I mean I think what he has done is courageous but I think his work as of late seems like a part of some bigger plot to dupe us. That being said we are treading in water that I can not be 100% certain of what happened. So take my words as my opion.
It is not just child pornography, they will threaten fake accusations about other things. The Turmp dossier is a very public example of what happens when you remain defiant. But there are others.
Here is a former government employee who describes the process. She say it happened to her.
Even if you don't have a control file, you know I always encourage all of our subscribers to watch the movie Enemy of the State because it's a perfect example of, you know, Will Smith plays a totally clean lawyer in Washington and so he's got nothing in, his control file is empty, and yet the intellegence agencies are able to persuade his own family that he's corrupt when he's not, his own partners he's corrupt when he's not.
I went through a similar process and so people are not only
afraid of what's in their control file, but they're afraid of spending eleven years in litigation proving that there's nothing in their control file.
The entire video is pretty good. Here's more
So, it was several days later, I got called into the Secretary's office and he said, "Have you found a way to do this?" And I said, "No. There's no legal way to do this. You can't"
And he was, litterally - I have never seen a man that frightened in my life - he was scared to death. And I was sure just from watching him that he was under extreme political pressure and I believe blackmail. And he just looked scared to death. And I went back up to my office and one of my deputies pulled me aside and he said, "You know you have to be very very careful" he said, "because you know there's real sexual dirt on the Secretary. So you have to be real careful."
...
That was the same time the Franklin scandal hit the Washington Times headlines.
...
We're literally watching a government that is being run by coercion whether it's the blackmail or control file or physical violence. If you don't do what you're told, there's really issues of physical violence now.
It's almost impossible to talk about. Nobody is going to believe a pedophile.
There's a guy who runs a Youtube channel, HuntingHarleys; he says that something like this happened to him. He talks about it in great detail in one of his videos, so you can see an example of how something like this might play out. I don't know if he's telling the truth, or not, and that's part of the problem: once you are accused of this, nobody will ever trust you with anything, ever. I think this is the video where he explains what happened. He rambles on, but he's a fairly good storyteller, and it's worth listening to :
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=J3EOjPrExM0
right, and the problem is in the society - just like soviet society immediately shunned and got against anyone accused of being an enemy of the people, american society immediately, UPON ACCUSATION, condemns the accused here.
Then once the target is suitably infuriated at their character being assassinated before their eyes, the accuser knowingly responds with their "this angry madman is scaring me!!" victimization bullshit. I'd like to take this moment to suggest informed membership in both the ACLU and NRA so you know exactly where those legal lines are drawn, then carefully validate and destroy anyone that knowingly steps over them.
in MN the LaDue case involved some dude selling a 45 automatic gun to a minor LaDue (think Columbine or SHES) and also the same gun supplying dude admitted multiple counts of rape against a 13YO girl, he got
ninety days concurrent
for all offenses, he was going to be a prosecution witness in the LaDue case, but that collapsed due to the falseness/stupidity of the epic opus manifesto aka diary..
What seems crazy to me is how the ideas are treated. I think of a guy who gets drunk, drives, and kills a child in the process. Then I think of a guy who viewed images and videos of any variety. No matter the content of the videos, the guy who actually killed someone seems infinitely worse, but that isn't how our societies view it remotely.
And so the saturation desensitization campaign begins.
Now we know some big badda bombs are about to drop. "no way that major public official we like is a kiddie fiddler, the major public officials we hate just made this shit up"
Isn't that what claimed alien abductee Stan Romanek claims? He's on or was on trial for CP charges. He claims they set him up to silence him. Didn't really follow he ordeal too close, just saw a couple headlines.
I guess they must really not given a shit about stopping Trump from becoming President then or else surely they'd have planted some child porn on his computers and knocked him out of the race that way.
It's like this: do they want to risk it coming back to haunt them? If someone found out that this was planted, the false accuser would look ten times worse because he or she had to have access to this stuff in the first place.
That's too big an "if" to risk, I would think.
If it worked, yes, he'd be gone. But if it didn't, the backlash against the accuser would be severe.
If somebody finds out it was planted then they’d just plant child porn on that person’s computer too.. I mean if the claim is that people in the deep state can plant child porn on anyone’s computer at any time to get rid of that person then it really is no risk to them at all.
When do you get to hear from them? I imagine most are locked away almost instantly, maybe upon their first time hearing of charges. Then anything you do read/hear from them, unless the words are out their own mouth, how do you know?
right, and the problem is in the society - just like soviet society immediately shunned and got against anyone accused of being an enemy of the people, american society immediately, UPON ACCUSATION, condemns the accused here.
What seems crazy to me is how the ideas are treated. I think of a guy who gets drunk, drives, and kills a child in the process. Then I think of a guy who viewed images and videos of any variety. No matter the content of the videos, the guy who actually killed someone seems infinitely worse, but that isn't how our societies view it remotely.
Then once the target is suitably infuriated at their character being assassinated before their eyes, the accuser knowingly responds with their "this angry madman is scaring me!!" victimization bullshit. I'd like to take this moment to suggest informed membership in both the ACLU and NRA so you know exactly where those legal lines are drawn, then carefully validate and destroy anyone that knowingly steps over them.
70 comments
1 DarthCasanova 2017-11-19
Yes this is true. I remember a year or two ago they said that thousands of computers in Homeland Security and other intel agencies were filled with CP. so either they’re all pedos or more probable the computer systems have been compromised to prevent agents from speaking the truth and blowing whistles.
1 m82918 2017-11-19
it's the same thing as when during Stalin's time, they accused you of being an "enemy of the people", an allegation thats impossible to disprove if govt presents proof, as there is nobody watching/controlling them - they are the ultimate authority.
literally anything can be fabricated, especially any online communication. if the govt says you wrote something in some online app or chat, and you didn't, there is no way you are going to prove you didn't. it's an insanely dangerous, sad situation.
1 digiorno 2017-11-19
One reason why many rich people pay other people use computers, phones, etc for them...at least officially.
1 Suburban_Nigga 2017-11-19
right before 9/11 a large amount of pentagon employees were caught with shut on their computer.
1 mjbmitch 2017-11-19
When was this?
1 NinjaSous 2017-11-19
I'd say over 16 years ago
1 perfect_pickles 2017-11-19
look into the GAO reports on federal credit card abuse, billions of dollars of it.
its how they keep their minions compliant and silent..
1 Lutherkiss3 2017-11-19
So true! Trump/Putin plan from Asia trip along with help from Bannon and Assange
1 r_zunabius 2017-11-19
Thank you for correcting the record.
1 Dyeredit 2017-11-19
Do you think they get paid by the hour, post number, or karma accumulated?
1 exasperated_facepalm 2017-11-19
Good eye. I've realized this for awhile now. It takes nothing to plant child porn on someone's device, computer, or hard drive, and is a nearly indefensible strategy to take down anyone or ruin their life. Sexual assault allegations can be just as Machiavellian as well.
1 Comethatmebro 2017-11-19
the more I learn about MJ the more I have to question if he really was a pedo or just set up.
1 legend747 2017-11-19
One thing to note about MJ is that his personality traits, regardless of how outlandish they came of, were not the norm of convicted pedophiles. I remember watching a documentary about the psychology of Michael Jackson and several argued that he didn't fit most of nuisance characteristics of child rapists.
1 eekamimi 2017-11-19
Michael Jackson was a totally different personality and lifestyle from any pedophile on record. Michael Jackson doesn't fit any profile, let alone a pedophiles.
1 LiberalsBTFOLOL 2017-11-19
Why would they set him up though?
1 ChocolateGodZilla42 2017-11-19
his music and the rights to it.
1 Comethatmebro 2017-11-19
because he was out spoken about the big conspiracy that our reality is manufactured lies to help keep tptb in power.
https://youtu.be/BwYQtQlGmGo
1 LiberalsBTFOLOL 2017-11-19
Wow pretty interesting. I can't remember, he said he had a disease and never bleached his skin right?
1 tmillsy23 2017-11-19
Vitiligo. I know people do get there skin treated because of it. Idk if it can change all of your skin though. Everytime I've seen it it's been spotting all over the person. UFC fighter Scott Jorgensen had it but got treatment now he is one color, much lighter than his natural color.
1 perfect_pickles 2017-11-19
ownership of Sony corp and its copyrights.
1 peetpeetpeetpeet 2017-11-19
Neverland ranch was a sanctuary for abused children.
1 LeBrons_Mom 2017-11-19
He admitted to sleeping in the same bed as children and giving them alcohol, and settled suits out of court. It’s hard not to connect the dots there even if he was set up in other ways.
1 Averagepunpun 2017-11-19
Pedophilia is one thing; acting on it is another. But personally, I think he just wanted to 'save' every kid so they don't get fucked up by life. Maybe he crossed some boundaries during that time, but I think it might have been more "creepy uncle" than predator.
1 Comethatmebro 2017-11-19
that is where I am at with it. Wierd dude, probably crossed some lines and made some mistakes because he is human (not justifying anything) but he might not have been the monster that they painted him as.
1 astrogirl 2017-11-19
Corey Feldman insists MJ was NOT a pedo.
1 Comethatmebro 2017-11-19
I have heard that and I know this will not be well received, but something seems off about Corey too. I mean I think what he has done is courageous but I think his work as of late seems like a part of some bigger plot to dupe us. That being said we are treading in water that I can not be 100% certain of what happened. So take my words as my opion.
1 Paulpaps 2017-11-19
So are paedophiles paedophiles or are they all set up? Maybe, just maybe, some are paedophiles.
1 behold-a-pale-Evan 2017-11-19
How is it... "Clear"
Shitpost.
Our Government always uses the sexual harassment shtick.
1 ogrelin 2017-11-19
You just stared exactly why it’s clear.
1 behold-a-pale-Evan 2017-11-19
I'm going CLEAR!
1 ogrelin 2017-11-19
Please don’t send letters to my employers or show up at my place filming me and talking to my neighbors ;)
1 behold-a-pale-Evan 2017-11-19
We got downvoted by Scientologists!
1 SirTroah 2017-11-19
It would be interesting who would make the list of fabricated set ups and totally real pedophile occultist.
1 ringer54673 2017-11-19
It is not just child pornography, they will threaten fake accusations about other things. The Turmp dossier is a very public example of what happens when you remain defiant. But there are others.
Here is a former government employee who describes the process. She say it happened to her.
Start at 5:22 in the video https://solari.com/blog/solari-stories-scandals-control-files-and-blackmail/
I went through a similar process and so people are not only afraid of what's in their control file, but they're afraid of spending eleven years in litigation proving that there's nothing in their control file.
The entire video is pretty good. Here's more
1 humanefly 2017-11-19
It's almost impossible to talk about. Nobody is going to believe a pedophile.
There's a guy who runs a Youtube channel, HuntingHarleys; he says that something like this happened to him. He talks about it in great detail in one of his videos, so you can see an example of how something like this might play out. I don't know if he's telling the truth, or not, and that's part of the problem: once you are accused of this, nobody will ever trust you with anything, ever. I think this is the video where he explains what happened. He rambles on, but he's a fairly good storyteller, and it's worth listening to : https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=J3EOjPrExM0
1 m82918 2017-11-19
right, and the problem is in the society - just like soviet society immediately shunned and got against anyone accused of being an enemy of the people, american society immediately, UPON ACCUSATION, condemns the accused here.
1 rrab 2017-11-19
Then once the target is suitably infuriated at their character being assassinated before their eyes, the accuser knowingly responds with their "this angry madman is scaring me!!" victimization bullshit. I'd like to take this moment to suggest informed membership in both the ACLU and NRA so you know exactly where those legal lines are drawn, then carefully validate and destroy anyone that knowingly steps over them.
1 m82918 2017-11-19
you can immediately ruin anyone in US and Western world by simply accusing them of it. its an insane thing.
1 perfect_pickles 2017-11-19
depends on who you are and what 'friends'
in MN the LaDue case involved some dude selling a 45 automatic gun to a minor LaDue (think Columbine or SHES) and also the same gun supplying dude admitted multiple counts of rape against a 13YO girl, he got ninety days concurrent for all offenses, he was going to be a prosecution witness in the LaDue case, but that collapsed due to the falseness/stupidity of the epic opus manifesto aka diary..
1 Zerophobe 2017-11-19
Lol you can't even a likely false allegation without getting blamed yourselves.
1 hvvhnuifihnsefvhnuis 2017-11-19
What seems crazy to me is how the ideas are treated. I think of a guy who gets drunk, drives, and kills a child in the process. Then I think of a guy who viewed images and videos of any variety. No matter the content of the videos, the guy who actually killed someone seems infinitely worse, but that isn't how our societies view it remotely.
1 Willough 2017-11-19
And yet they'll do nothing about it when it really happens.
1 Suburban_Nigga 2017-11-19
This is a huge pit fall of the devices we use everyday it takes 1 min to black mail someone
1 Zerophobe 2017-11-19
For a while; that has been the new crack.
Just sprinkle it on anyone you want to hit up.
1 thetydollars 2017-11-19
Inb4 only republicans are the ones that do the framing.
All political disclaimers: I hate both parties
1 SockJon 2017-11-19
Are you saying this now because two R's just got caught or are you this critical at pizzagate too?
1 Kykle 2017-11-19
Inb4 "pizzagate isn't partisan"
1 Bitcointechnomage 2017-11-19
And so the saturation desensitization campaign begins.
Now we know some big badda bombs are about to drop. "no way that major public official we like is a kiddie fiddler, the major public officials we hate just made this shit up"
1 pmichel 2017-11-19
absolutely agree
1 perfect_pickles 2017-11-19
read the intro and background of the 'hero' of this book.
guess what their job is...
1 digera 2017-11-19
copy and paste it here...
1 StThomasAquina 2017-11-19
Isn't that what claimed alien abductee Stan Romanek claims? He's on or was on trial for CP charges. He claims they set him up to silence him. Didn't really follow he ordeal too close, just saw a couple headlines.
1 sickofallofyou 2017-11-19
2008 - http://www.slate.com/articles/news_and_politics/explainer/2008/06/why_would_a_virus_look_at_kiddie_porn.html
2016 - https://community.norton.com/en/forums/possible-virus-us-government-plant-child-porn-pc-0
1 kgt5003 2017-11-19
I guess they must really not given a shit about stopping Trump from becoming President then or else surely they'd have planted some child porn on his computers and knocked him out of the race that way.
1 NewSouthernBelle 2017-11-19
It's like this: do they want to risk it coming back to haunt them? If someone found out that this was planted, the false accuser would look ten times worse because he or she had to have access to this stuff in the first place.
That's too big an "if" to risk, I would think.
If it worked, yes, he'd be gone. But if it didn't, the backlash against the accuser would be severe.
Just my opinion.
1 kgt5003 2017-11-19
If somebody finds out it was planted then they’d just plant child porn on that person’s computer too.. I mean if the claim is that people in the deep state can plant child porn on anyone’s computer at any time to get rid of that person then it really is no risk to them at all.
1 AngelicMayhem 2017-11-19
Using mobile as I scrolled by this I stopped to read the title and the post faded out like I tapped on it. I've never had that happen before.
1 colin_forreal 2017-11-19
Keeps happening to me if I make eye contact with a post. Weird
1 iHOPEimNOTanNPC 2017-11-19
This is happened to me several times this week too. Generally on a lot of these sexual-harassment/pizza gatish posts.
1 -Chakas- 2017-11-19
The concept of illegal information has always been dangerous, no matter what form it takes or how morally reprehensible it is.
1 WisperingPenis 2017-11-19
I have mentioned this several times here.
1 Dummy_Detector 2017-11-19
Funny though.... Can you think of a single one who has claimed they were framed ? I can't.
1 Darkparktarmparm 2017-11-19
When do you get to hear from them? I imagine most are locked away almost instantly, maybe upon their first time hearing of charges. Then anything you do read/hear from them, unless the words are out their own mouth, how do you know?
1 terminalyo 2017-11-19
That's the whole purpose of "pizzagate". They want to be able to arrest you because you used a word that they later decide was a code.
1 __G_A_R_D_E_N_E_R__ 2017-11-19
True.
1 iccixxi 2017-11-19
The funny thing about charges...
...how is he grounded like that?
1 bizmarxie 2017-11-19
An AA gentleman on the Electoral Integrity panel was taken down for child porn and this was the first thing I though of.
1 LurkPro3000 2017-11-19
What exactly are you referencing? What do you think was planted?
1 Dyeredit 2017-11-19
Do you think they get paid by the hour, post number, or karma accumulated?
1 m82918 2017-11-19
right, and the problem is in the society - just like soviet society immediately shunned and got against anyone accused of being an enemy of the people, american society immediately, UPON ACCUSATION, condemns the accused here.
1 m82918 2017-11-19
you can immediately ruin anyone in US and Western world by simply accusing them of it. its an insane thing.
1 Zerophobe 2017-11-19
Lol you can't even a likely false allegation without getting blamed yourselves.
1 hvvhnuifihnsefvhnuis 2017-11-19
What seems crazy to me is how the ideas are treated. I think of a guy who gets drunk, drives, and kills a child in the process. Then I think of a guy who viewed images and videos of any variety. No matter the content of the videos, the guy who actually killed someone seems infinitely worse, but that isn't how our societies view it remotely.
1 rrab 2017-11-19
Then once the target is suitably infuriated at their character being assassinated before their eyes, the accuser knowingly responds with their "this angry madman is scaring me!!" victimization bullshit. I'd like to take this moment to suggest informed membership in both the ACLU and NRA so you know exactly where those legal lines are drawn, then carefully validate and destroy anyone that knowingly steps over them.