Lack of Coverage of Clinton/Russia but plenty of coverage from a Trump phone call.

109 2017-10-18 by middleclassbatman

[removed]

46 comments

Removed. Rule 12.

Sometimes? :P

hey man have you ever thought about how idiocracy is like a documentary man

NBC news is basically a joke right now.

I was watching it on cbs's morning show and it was the most cringeworthy thing ever watching them try to plug in that he avoided the draft over a bone spurt. These "journalists" are the real enemy.

Wrong sub, you're looking for the_Donald

Correct sub. The fact that our mainstream media is blatant propaganda and manipulation of public sentiment is definitely a conspiracy.

I posted a link yesterday to the independent article on the matter. It was the 16th top article in their world news. I'm surprised they even covered it but it was buried.

Now you have all the correct buzzwords! Just add #maga #fakenews

Lol. Keep trying.

Imagine if every news station, movie, TV shows and all mainstream websites were incredibly biased towards the right, and complicit in spreading blatant misinformation/distractions to the public on an hourly basis (imagine Fox News but EVERYWHERE)... would being against a system like that automatically make you a bleeding heart liberal/leftist?

No, it wouldn't. And posting about that in a conspiracy forum would not be biased.

And if you don't think that the entire media complex is extremely left leaning, collectively trying to push an agenda, then you need to take a step back an recognize the partisan bubble that you're probably stuck inside of.

You don't have to say shit like MAGA and cuck to be against propaganda.

Conspiracies are only allowed if they make Trump look bad? Hmm, I don't think so. Fuck off.

Anything that is negative PR for Clinton belongs in T_D

LOL look at this guy

Unfortunately, the new Clinton/Russia story is just weak. All the donations to her foundation were already known during the campaign.

I was sincerely hoping they'd have some actual substance to try and go after her. But they don't have shit.

Wikileaks usually stages their releases for gradual escalation. I guess we will find out soon enough.

I don't think this story was wikileak related.

Good luck.

That is not true, have you read the report?

Your number of downvotes are quite telling...

So you haven’t?

Hahah what were you saying...

Just to be clear, I meant that as in, you were being downvoted for speaking the truth to the user above you. Not as in, "you're being downvoted because your wrong.

Ah, thanks bud

Old news. Nothingburger. The RWNJs are desperate to get the heat off their God Emperor.

http://www.snopes.com/hillary-clinton-uranium-russia-deal/

Did you really just post a snopes article here???!! Please gtfo

But bro, THEY fact checked it.

Priorities man, priorities.

She is done so story over. That was the nail in the coffin. The coffin was built by Bill but finished by Trump. She is a shit person and honestly, anyone seeking that top office seems to be a shit person.

Clinton is a lifelong politician and corrupt. (use whatever first name you want)

Trump is a life long billionaire who thinks 1000 a year or 83.33 per month will make an impact on the economy.

Bushes were assholes, Regan too. Even Kennedy who is the poster child for the Dems and many people's favorite president cheated on his wife, had his girls fuck his friends to show power and other Harvey Weinstein type behaviors that should be enough to excuse you from the presidency.

Our two-party system is broken.

I noticed you didn't mention the Obamas or Bernie. So what's your whiny nihilistic take on them.

I want to know more.

Obama set up an Internship for his kid with Weinstein so that says a lot. It would be easier for you to show me which poloticians are actually working for us.

None because becoming a politician implies that you are beholden to corporate power. If you don't already play their ball, then they kick you out of the game. Even those who aren't as "corrupt" as the worst politicians, are still going along with the fucked up system we have. Nobody is on our side. We have to be on our own side it seems. It's kinda tough to do that when TPTB are using the people we trust in order to keep us divided.

Sounds good to me, how did you know I love nehi soda?

And the coverage on Trump's phone call is based on a democrat who "overheard" it... They don't care at all about the grieving widow, they just want to push negative news about Trump no matter the cost. Poor woman.

WRONG. Grieving widow confirmed the horrendous phone call and it upset her. http://wapo.st/2hOIFcv

Spare me your Trump persecution crocodile tears. Poor woman indeed.

Can't view the article without signing up for a membership. Archive it or link me an article that I don't have to pay $ to view.

(Not the person you were talking to)

I was able to see the article just fine, but here's a different link: "President Trump did disrespect my son and my daughter and also me and my husband."

Yeah I found the article on CNN and replied earlier. They asked the mother in law of the widow. Nothing from the woman on the phone. This is disgusting that the MSM are blowing up and twisting an extremely private phone call with a grieving mom. They don't even get the facts or check with the widow if she's OK with the story. They don't give a shit about her. It's disgusting.

Oh my god. You're doubting the widow's mother-in-law ? The soldier's mother ?!

You're despicable. Totally reprehensible.

The fallen soldier’s mother said she also heard the call, and confirmed Wilson’s account was accurate.

I admit. You're good at 'picking nits' so to speak, in order to push that "disgusting MSM" narrative you got going there.

My tiny violin is playing for how unfair the MSM is towards Trumpo. snert

Use uBlock Origin on your browser. It bypasses WaPo's paywall.

You are wrong, read the article again. The MOTHER IN LAW of the widow. Who was not on the phone. This is disgusting.

Wouldn't the Mother-In-Law of the widow be the mother of the soldier?

Yes. She was not on the phone call. And she is not a widow.

As intended.

And as usual they exploit and focus in on highly emotional issues. While staying away from facts, events and issues with serious consequence like giving an 'enemy' nuclear related material.

Really? I think the brigading and disinfo campaign all over reddit and twitter to promote the Jon Solomon article is a lot more noticeable.

I mean, that's the point of your submission, no?

Nope. But I appreciate the time you took to respond.

Wikileaks usually stages their releases for gradual escalation. I guess we will find out soon enough.

That is not true, have you read the report?

Old news. Nothingburger. The RWNJs are desperate to get the heat off their God Emperor.

http://www.snopes.com/hillary-clinton-uranium-russia-deal/