Thank you for reading, commenting and sharing!

2 hours and not even 45 upvotes. Anyone else find that strange? A pizza shop can get thousand of upvotes but an elected leader who rapes kids can't?

Oh. Nevermind he is a Republican and they get a pass in this sub these days.

And you're fighting this bipartisanism how? By stoking the flames of bipartisanism?

And you're fighting this bipartisanism how? By stoking the flames of bipartisanism?

By posting articles about all sides that I feel aren't represented on this sub. However they don't get upvotes unless they go against the Democrats.

That's not even true

Then please explain how a pizzagate post can get hundreds of posts and this gets 5 - most of which are telling me I am wrong.

Because you're pandering to partisan division by even making it an issue, it's not because he's republican.

The truth is that most of the organic users here don't pay any attention to partisan division simply because we see it as the illusion that it is. Pizzagate posts get downvoted with or without republicans being implicated, it's usually based on the sensitivity of what's being posted.

Now, this man has been discussed for years on this sub. It is likely just an old topic for many, so it's not gaining popularity. However, as I type this, the post is at 86% upvoted. So, it seems as though you are pandering to partisan division under unfounded pretenses.

So, how about you just stop talking about partisan differences and start recognizing their similarities. Like, how they are ALL blackmailed with pedophilia. Democrats, Republicans, anyone with even a sliver of power is beholden to higher-ups.

This is a series of posts, most series don't have many comments, so that could be another reason.

There are so many explanations of how normal pizzagate posts gain more comments than this one.

Why should I talk to people who aren't honorable enough to now downvote those they are having a discussion with. Tell you what start acting like you at least a minor amount of maturity then we can talk.

You're associating "honor" with downvoting, that's a little pathetic don't you think? And I can't possibly be the only one downvoting you based on the quality of discussion you are providing.

Why don't you start at least acting like you have something productive to contribute to the discussion, you're nothing but a partisan troll. Facts, evidence, content. Start using them.

You're associating "honor" with downvoting, that's a little pathetic don't you think? And I can't possibly be the only one downvoting you based on the quality of discussion you are providing.

I am associating honor with following rules you have agreed to of your own freewill. Specificity both the written and unwritten rules of this site and this sub. You, as your own words who, aren't willing to keep your commitments and behave civilly to others as your behavior has demonstrated.

you're nothing but a partisan troll. Facts, evidence, content. Start using them.

My entire posting history on this site and more specifically on this sub show that not to be true. Some, on this sub, really find me annoying but most of them will at least say I am consistent, will point out when I am wrong if it is brought to my attention, that I admit when I make mistakes, and that I insist of factual evidence of claims.

Have a cheerful day.

I hate to say this but... /pol was right about Reddit.. reddit is the "left" of the message boards.

When I came to reddit thought it was going to be a devisive version of /pol, which it seemed to be but people like you make me think there is no hope for a balanced not partisan debate forum... sad

Don't say that.

"That"

I just mean not to be so entirely negative. The sub isn't completely devoid of good conversations if you want them.

There is "hope" as long as you speak like there is. If you make the blanket statement that all is lost......well then that is what you'll get.

Your comments are so mature

Well put, Snow

It's weird looking back now, the vote count flipped lol

Boy, did it ever.

Dude, this post is on the front page. What are you even talking about?

That doesn't mean its not being used to make a statement by stacking votes in favor of a certain way of looking at issues like pizzagate and related info.

This is a pizzagate post, genius.

Pedogate=/~Pizzagate

You come across as a clueless, headline reader.

""The judge added, “Some actions can obliterate a lifetime of good works. Nothing is more stunning than having a “serial child molester” and “speaker of the House” in the same sentence.”"

Hastert is still a pretty big deal, regardless of party. Gimme a Democrat in as high ranking of an office with a similar rap sheet and then we'll talk .

Really interesting to see a guy like you saying he does anything with regard to "all sides".

Have you ever been critical of NIST for not releasing their modeling data?

Almost agreed with you. Pedo crimes are not partisan...

Mr. DeLay wrote, “We all have our flaws, but Dennis Hastert has very few.” Talk about tone deaf. Mr. DeLay concluded, “He is a good man that loves the Lord.” We must wonder which “Lord” that Mr. Hastert worships.

"Crazy in Moloch! Cocksucker in Moloch! Lacklove and manless in Moloch!"

And you're fighting this bipartisanism how? By stoking the flames of bipartisanism?

By posting articles about all sides that I feel aren't represented on this sub. However they don't get upvotes unless they go against the Democrats.