What other corrupted government agency run by oligarchs could pull it off and has financial incentives to do so? A lot of forensic evidence exists for controlled demolitions.
https://youtu.be/xqqelDq4P48
. The NIST relies on faulty computer models to justify the collapses but cant create a physical demonstration in the most basic of senses. Mythbusters "debunked" the myth of "melted" steel by showing what is called creep, a fatigue in strength because of added heat. Sure, the over loaded ibeam buckled, but it didnt melt and implies the steel structure of the entire building (all 80 floors below) were at the same temperature. That couldnt be further from the truth, and steel structures designed to carry 10 times their own weight dont just give away at the speed of gravity.
I think it is whats keeping him alive. He'll provide definitive proof of an inside job via phone records or texts , etc. no evidence for that belief but i think he is sitting on it or will be leaked eventually to them. The evidence is in the previous post for the physics for controlled demolition.
So how do you as truth seeking individual arrive at any opinion on truth? like 911 being an inside job? ...the rational deductive reason should make you arrive at the conclusion that anyone hoarding as much information as Assange and has access to information could not deny 911 truth unless like Obama, Hillary, trump and every politician in the world, they are working for the very people who did 911. Hence 911 is the litmus test for fake media, fake politicians, fake global rivaries and fake truthers like Assange.
Every politician in the world? That is a bit much. I think Bush and associates are the main culprits and possibly more but jr was president, cheney was vice, senior was director of the CIA. They used a false flag attack and peddled fake news to invade iraq. They also stopped an audit of the CIA as well as on going investigations into the financial crimes of energy corporations such as Enron. Sorry, this thread is the idea assange is sitting on his golden ticket for his life.
You know, kinda make a good point. He is not a physicist and probably wouldnt know based on those reasons and likely then hasnt seen the evidence presented professionally like here:
https://youtu.be/xqqelDq4P48
The 9/11 thing really stands out. Why go through all that shit this past election and now vault 7 but deny the most basic of physics and literal chemical evidence?
What other corrupted government agency run by oligarchs could pull it off and has financial incentives to do so? A lot of forensic evidence exists for controlled demolitions.
https://youtu.be/xqqelDq4P48
. The NIST relies on faulty computer models to justify the collapses but cant create a physical demonstration in the most basic of senses. Mythbusters "debunked" the myth of "melted" steel by showing what is called creep, a fatigue in strength because of added heat. Sure, the over loaded ibeam buckled, but it didnt melt and implies the steel structure of the entire building (all 80 floors below) were at the same temperature. That couldnt be further from the truth, and steel structures designed to carry 10 times their own weight dont just give away at the speed of gravity.
34 comments
n/a The_Veracity_Sector 2017-07-04
What makes you think this?
n/a IpsumProlixus 2017-07-04
What other corrupted government agency run by oligarchs could pull it off and has financial incentives to do so? A lot of forensic evidence exists for controlled demolitions. https://youtu.be/xqqelDq4P48 . The NIST relies on faulty computer models to justify the collapses but cant create a physical demonstration in the most basic of senses. Mythbusters "debunked" the myth of "melted" steel by showing what is called creep, a fatigue in strength because of added heat. Sure, the over loaded ibeam buckled, but it didnt melt and implies the steel structure of the entire building (all 80 floors below) were at the same temperature. That couldnt be further from the truth, and steel structures designed to carry 10 times their own weight dont just give away at the speed of gravity.
n/a The_Veracity_Sector 2017-07-04
That really doesn't answer my question, but ok.
n/a IpsumProlixus 2017-07-04
I think it is whats keeping him alive. He'll provide definitive proof of an inside job via phone records or texts , etc. no evidence for that belief but i think he is sitting on it or will be leaked eventually to them. The evidence is in the previous post for the physics for controlled demolition.
n/a themeanbeaver 2017-07-04
imagine a real truther who refuses to talk about 911 truth? a fake one named assange whose wikileaks is actually a cia front.
n/a IpsumProlixus 2017-07-04
So when do you think he will release it?
n/a themeanbeaver 2017-07-04
he's a fuck fake! don't hold your breathe lad.
n/a IpsumProlixus 2017-07-04
That's like your opinion man
n/a themeanbeaver 2017-07-04
So how do you as truth seeking individual arrive at any opinion on truth? like 911 being an inside job? ...the rational deductive reason should make you arrive at the conclusion that anyone hoarding as much information as Assange and has access to information could not deny 911 truth unless like Obama, Hillary, trump and every politician in the world, they are working for the very people who did 911. Hence 911 is the litmus test for fake media, fake politicians, fake global rivaries and fake truthers like Assange.
n/a IpsumProlixus 2017-07-04
Every politician in the world? That is a bit much. I think Bush and associates are the main culprits and possibly more but jr was president, cheney was vice, senior was director of the CIA. They used a false flag attack and peddled fake news to invade iraq. They also stopped an audit of the CIA as well as on going investigations into the financial crimes of energy corporations such as Enron. Sorry, this thread is the idea assange is sitting on his golden ticket for his life.
n/a Ninjakick666 2017-07-04
Within 2 days of August 29th.
n/a The_Veracity_Sector 2017-07-04
Interested. Why might I ask?
n/a Ninjakick666 2017-07-04
20 year anniversary of Skynet becoming self-aware.
n/a The_Veracity_Sector 2017-07-04
Ok great. Thanks. Off to look into Skynet.
n/a News_Bot 2017-07-04
Fucking hell.
n/a IpsumProlixus 2017-07-04
Is this also when the economy collapses and internet cuts off?
n/a falconerhk 2017-07-04
Announced across the stratosphere by Andy Kaufman and Prince. Project Purple Strange.
n/a pianickp 2017-07-04
CIA will reveal the CIA carried out 9/11. When?
n/a IpsumProlixus 2017-07-04
When will he? I dont know. I dont believe he is CIA.
n/a LightBringerFlex 2017-07-04
Didn't Assange deny 9-11 was an inside job?
n/a IpsumProlixus 2017-07-04
You know, kinda make a good point. He is not a physicist and probably wouldnt know based on those reasons and likely then hasnt seen the evidence presented professionally like here: https://youtu.be/xqqelDq4P48
n/a News_Bot 2017-07-04
Because it was Mossad.
n/a IpsumProlixus 2017-07-04
Also, he is not a physicist.
n/a AIsuicide 2017-07-04
Are you a physicist?
n/a IpsumProlixus 2017-07-04
Bet your ass I am.
n/a AIsuicide 2017-07-04
Am I physicist?
n/a IpsumProlixus 2017-07-04
Ive done some reading on assange and 9/11. I think i may have convinced myself that maybe he is a shill. He does deny it..... seriously WTF.
n/a AIsuicide 2017-07-04
Yeah..he doesn't add up there. And when I see things like that, I take note. I don't claim to understand his inner workings. He's done some good.
But he's also managed to attract attention over nothing sometimes when other important things are happening.
n/a IpsumProlixus 2017-07-04
The 9/11 thing really stands out. Why go through all that shit this past election and now vault 7 but deny the most basic of physics and literal chemical evidence?
n/a AIsuicide 2017-07-04
I don't know. I wonder if he will have any comments on the release of the WTC7 Evaluation in August? We will see soon enough.
n/a IpsumProlixus 2017-07-04
Trump is a truther for crying out loud! How is Assange not. How deep is the rabbit hole.
n/a AIsuicide 2017-07-04
I don't believe Trump is a truther. I believe he says things without thinking it through.
Just because he said it looked like explosives were involved does not mean he will ever pursue looking into it.
Much more likely that he could be convinced that for the integrity of the nation, the truth must never come out.
n/a Definitely-Not-CIA 2017-07-04
Sometimes between 'lolnever' and 'there's absolutely no proof'.
n/a IpsumProlixus 2017-07-04
User name checks out.
n/a no_easy-way 2017-07-04
Wonder if this will be before or after whatever is coming ((that we're 'holding our breath' for).
n/a IpsumProlixus 2017-07-04
What other corrupted government agency run by oligarchs could pull it off and has financial incentives to do so? A lot of forensic evidence exists for controlled demolitions. https://youtu.be/xqqelDq4P48 . The NIST relies on faulty computer models to justify the collapses but cant create a physical demonstration in the most basic of senses. Mythbusters "debunked" the myth of "melted" steel by showing what is called creep, a fatigue in strength because of added heat. Sure, the over loaded ibeam buckled, but it didnt melt and implies the steel structure of the entire building (all 80 floors below) were at the same temperature. That couldnt be further from the truth, and steel structures designed to carry 10 times their own weight dont just give away at the speed of gravity.