Thermite didn't bring down the World Trade Centers. Thermite was produced by the combination of Iron Oxide from the beams and Aluminum from the exterior.
0 2017-07-04 by Sanatana_dasa
That's all thermite is...aluminum and rust. No conspiracy there.
BUT...there is evidence that Directed Energy Weapons could have been at play. Read more:
86 comments
n/a mazer_rack_em 2017-07-04
yeah except the beams aren't made of iron oxide, and with thermite the materials need to be powdered and completely mixed.
n/a Sanatana_dasa 2017-07-04
It's called rust. And the towers turned to dust before they hit the ground. Look at the seismic data.
n/a StarchildStChampion 2017-07-04
It took you 16 years and yet you're still full of shit.
(Though to be honest, I don't think you're shoveling shit, I think you're just dull.)
n/a Sanatana_dasa 2017-07-04
Didn't address the point. Shill. Ad Hominum much?
n/a StarchildStChampion 2017-07-04
Ask the Architects and Engineers for 9/11 truth, tough guy.
n/a Sanatana_dasa 2017-07-04
Ah, so now we know which organization you represent. I'm sorry that there's evidence that the thermite narrative can be rationally explained scientifically, as a consequence and not a cause.
Disinfo shill.
n/a ShellOilNigeria 2017-07-04
Removed Rule 0
n/a CaptainApollyon 2017-07-04
not an argument
n/a Sanatana_dasa 2017-07-04
In her videos, she explains that Architects and Engineers for 9/11 Truth has censored these topics and is controlled opposition. One of the first shills to comment on my original thread referred to them after basically slandering me. They banned someone from their website for mentioning the same topic on their forums...
n/a ShellOilNigeria 2017-07-04
Removed, rule 10
n/a ShellOilNigeria 2017-07-04
Removed, rule 10
n/a mazer_rack_em 2017-07-04
yeah, believe it or not they don't make structural supports for skyscrapers out of rust.
n/a Sanatana_dasa 2017-07-04
Steel beams rust retard.
n/a mazer_rack_em 2017-07-04
nothing that you're theorizing works how you describe.
n/a Sanatana_dasa 2017-07-04
Well, nothing that you're theorizing works how you describe either.
Lol, you're logical fallacies are hilarious.
You're good at psyops. How much you get paid?
n/a mazer_rack_em 2017-07-04
that steel beams are made of steel?
n/a Sanatana_dasa 2017-07-04
And that steel beams react with the environment to produce...
(C'mon man, you take chemistry? Are you like 12 years old?)
RUST
n/a mazer_rack_em 2017-07-04
you need two and a half times as much iron oxide as you do aluminum, there's just not a way for what you're describing to happen.
n/a Sanatana_dasa 2017-07-04
Uh, yes there is. If there was 2.5 times as much rust as aluminum it would. What the fuck? lol. If the two exist, then SOME thermite would form.
n/a mazer_rack_em 2017-07-04
i just don't think there'd be anywhere near the amount of iron oxide necessary.
n/a Sanatana_dasa 2017-07-04
Steel beams that have existed for decades? You obviously don't have much experience with rusted steel
n/a mazer_rack_em 2017-07-04
I think you're just really underestimating the amount of rust that would be needed, then to all get perfectly pulverized and mix perfectly with the equally perfectly pulverized aluminum siding (which I'm sure wasn't just aluminum), in the perfect ratio. it just seems unlikely.
n/a Sanatana_dasa 2017-07-04
I think you are missing my point. The thermite didn't take down the buildings. They found trace amounts.
n/a lil_nutsack 2017-07-04
I agree with OP. The amounts of thermite were so trace that it could be chalked up as a byproduct of what actually happened at the WTC. OP isn't saying thermite was what caused the steel to dustify.
You're here to try and confuse people, not to prove your point.
n/a raisinpop 2017-07-04
If they rust enough to make that much iron oxide they would of failed without an airplane crashing into them
n/a Sanatana_dasa 2017-07-04
Can you back that up with math? How much thermite was even found? You think there was pools of it?
If I recall, it was nanograms.
n/a ShellOilNigeria 2017-07-04
Removed Rule 10
n/a pev002 2017-07-04
I needed a good laugh have an upvote!
n/a Torquenitte 2017-07-04
Considering how fast and aggressive the shills hit this topic I'm pretty sure it's on the right track.
n/a Sanatana_dasa 2017-07-04
Thanks for showing up...I was beginning to think I was out numbered. They probably have thousands of corporate shill slaves working in an underground sweatshop in DC. Or something.
n/a chrisolivertimes 2017-07-04
They're not shills, at least not human ones, they're AI designed to keep us blind.
n/a AutoModerator 2017-07-04
While not required, you are requested to use the NP (No Participation) domain of reddit when crossposting. This helps to protect both your account, and the accounts of other users, from administrative shadowbans. The NP domain can be accessed by replacing the "www" in your reddit link with "np".
I am a bot, and this action was performed automatically. Please contact the moderators of this subreddit if you have any questions or concerns.
n/a Sanatana_dasa 2017-07-04
That makes sense. They have automated responses for a particular topic that is touchy. And they are designed to divert attention away from critical thinking.
n/a chrisolivertimes 2017-07-04
It's purpose is two-fold (as nothing is done for just one reason.) They want to deter you from realizing the truth of this existence ("What truth?" That you are a slave, Neo. ) while simultaneously making you think your fellow man is a giant asshat when given the anonymity of the internet.
n/a mconeone 2017-07-04
Some here think the DEW theory is a red herring designed to make 9/11 truthers look crazy. I wouldn't doubt that many of the downvotes are legitimate.
n/a CaptainApollyon 2017-07-04
when there is no valid counter argument in the comments yet you get mocking comments and downvotes... something should seem suspicious.
n/a mconeone 2017-07-04
Sure, hence my comment.
FWIW I think DEW theory has some merit, but WTC 7 appeared to be a normal demolition and is much easier to communicate to others.
n/a News_Bot 2017-07-04
Isn't there even a nuke theory?
Pretty obvious controlled demolition. Whether or not thermite was used intentionally makes little difference with Mossad-planted explosives.
n/a Rockran 2017-07-04
How do you distinguish between shills and people with views that differ from your own.
n/a Sanatana_dasa 2017-07-04
Can we get some reinforcements in here? The shills are crackin' down.
n/a CaptainApollyon 2017-07-04
exposing themselves
ftfy
n/a lIIIlznqapxnn1011001 2017-07-04
Your message is getting out. They can't slide articles out fast enough.
n/a Rockran 2017-07-04
Asking for votes?
n/a Sanatana_dasa 2017-07-04
No, comments.
n/a Rockran 2017-07-04
ok good because I downvoted your post.
n/a Sanatana_dasa 2017-07-04
I'm sorry, I thought it was a worthwhile topic to discuss. I mean, considering this is a conspiracy forum and all...
n/a Rockran 2017-07-04
This is a conspiracy forum, but it's not a nonsense forum.
n/a Dysnomi 2017-07-04
As a connesieur of nonsense, this is not nonsense. It's disinfo.
n/a CaptainApollyon 2017-07-04
Curator of nonsense?
n/a Dysnomi 2017-07-04
Exactly.
n/a CaptainApollyon 2017-07-04
k...
n/a Dysnomi 2017-07-04
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Absurdism
Your dog needs more relish.
n/a CaptainApollyon 2017-07-04
So you're a nihilist? What's the point of even being in a conspiracy forum then?
n/a Dysnomi 2017-07-04
More of an existentialist, but Russian nihilism is very anti-authority. Camus' stories are very appropriate for this subreddit. Do you even Western philosophy?
n/a CaptainApollyon 2017-07-04
Good thing you're here to let us know that everything is nonsense .
n/a rodental 2017-07-04
Or, maybe the Israeli "art students" spent weeks setting it up for demo so that it would fall straight down.
n/a Sanatana_dasa 2017-07-04
That doesn't explain how the building turned to dust. Kinetic energy cannot do that.
n/a rodental 2017-07-04
Yes, it can. What part of an explosion do you think blows things up? Perhaps the massive kinetic impulse?
n/a Sanatana_dasa 2017-07-04
No...the materials dustified in mid air...not from the explosion. As they fell, they turned into dust. They didn't explode into dust. They, relatively slowly, disintegrated.
n/a rodental 2017-07-04
Ok brah.
n/a Sanatana_dasa 2017-07-04
Architects and Engineers for 9/11 Truth is the "official" conspiracy.
The official conspiracy is wrong.
n/a rodental 2017-07-04
I'm not sure what you mean by "the official conspiracy", but I did study engineering at a university for 6 years, and I personally believe it was a controlled demo, and an obvious one at that.
n/a Sanatana_dasa 2017-07-04
Yeah, but it doesn't answer all the questions. It's an incomplete answer.
It was a controlled demolition. But it wasn't done with explosions. It was done with electromagnetic energy.
n/a rodental 2017-07-04
sauce?
n/a truthmaybefalse 2017-07-04
here
n/a rodental 2017-07-04
Did I mention I studied engineering for 6 years?
n/a CaptainApollyon 2017-07-04
do you also know someone who has an aunt who's kid was killed in sandy hook?
n/a rodental 2017-07-04
Sandy Hook was a hoax imho.
n/a CaptainApollyon 2017-07-04
if it was thermite why didn't the towers glow bright as the sun?
n/a rodental 2017-07-04
I said nothing about thermite.
n/a CaptainApollyon 2017-07-04
so you have evidence that different explosives were used?
n/a rodental 2017-07-04
No. I believe it was a controlled demo because of the lack of toppling and free fall speeds. As far as I'm concerned, the only possible way you can achieve that is by cutting almost every structural support symmetrically and evenly. Fail to do so and the building topples or shears, it does not fall straight down.
It's possible thermite (which I should not is not an explosive) was used to cut the supports, but it would be a somewhat unusual choice, given the wide range of modern demolitions explosives. I would think that shaped charges would be more likely, but there is some evidence that there was thermite. That said, I think it's plausible that rust and aluminium powdered by explosions could mix and create small amounts of thermite. You would have to do a whole bunch of lab tests to find out for sure though.
n/a CaptainApollyon 2017-07-04
shills are in panic mode because this finally made it to the front page after two years
https://np.reddit.com/r/conspiracy/comments/6l0wbe/this_video_changed_my_whole_perception_on_911/
n/a Sanatana_dasa 2017-07-04
Yeah, this is what I watched. I'm echoing it!!
n/a crestind 2017-07-04
Chemical reaction speed can be dependent on surface area of reactants involved. In the case of thermite I think they both need to be mixed properly as a fine powder. In the WTC it was sheets and beams... very low SA.
n/a Sanatana_dasa 2017-07-04
Wrong, it was dustified.
n/a raisinpop 2017-07-04
Dude my car is rusted as fuck and it hasn't ruptured into flames. I don't have math to back it up, but when has that ever happened in the history of steel structures.
n/a Sanatana_dasa 2017-07-04
Lol overgeneralization.
There was a massive fucking microwave-like weapon used on the building.
n/a JUSTIN_HERGINA 2017-07-04
There's no direct evidence of that, even Judy wood was careful to say that.
She said some things don't add up, but she never commits 100% to her own theory.
Keep that in mind.
n/a Sanatana_dasa 2017-07-04
Thanks for the wisdom! It's important to tread lightly.
n/a JUSTIN_HERGINA 2017-07-04
Yor theory relies on the fact that the steel beams were in fact rusty.
You can't have structural steel that's rusty in a high rise building. I would accept your theory if they were in a exposed-beam structure, but they weren't. They were insulated in fire-proofing materials, and not exploded to 'environment'.
The aluminum facade was the only metal exposed to the elements.
n/a Sanatana_dasa 2017-07-04
The pictures of the beams clearly show rust.
n/a JUSTIN_HERGINA 2017-07-04
Which ones?
n/a falconerhk 2017-07-04
This is the kind of thread you find in a spitoon.
n/a Sanatana_dasa 2017-07-04
Why is it nonsense? Isn't this an important topic? Who cares if I'm wrong, it's a good discussion.
n/a lil_nutsack 2017-07-04
Wtf? 75+ comments and score of 0? Reddit plz
It's extremely apparent that this is something 'they' don't want people thinking about. Keep fighting the good fight.
n/a Sanatana_dasa 2017-07-04
That doesn't explain how the building turned to dust. Kinetic energy cannot do that.
n/a chrisolivertimes 2017-07-04
They're not shills, at least not human ones, they're AI designed to keep us blind.
n/a Sanatana_dasa 2017-07-04
Wrong, it was dustified.
n/a CaptainApollyon 2017-07-04
k...