If DNC will hire mentally ill homeless people to starts fights at Trump rallies, they will hire women to falsely accuse Trump.

279 2016-10-18 by blakdart

18 comments

Greed has no limits. It never limits itself, it has to be limited by some kind of outside force.

How dare you insult the free market! May the invisible hand strike you down!

Its been trying

to not avail so far as good Knight!

This. If someone (proudly) acknowledges they use mentally ill & homeless people to instigate fights why on earth do people think the same people wouldn't stoop to false sexual allegations?

I dunno, but its probably the same reason they don't believe that Welfare was used to manipulate blacks and other minorities and that it's a guise pretending to help.

I thought the same thing. I think so.

Yup.

I am willing to believe that Trump did grab those women's tits. But, I also know that there are lots of girls who are down for that from a rich guy like Trump. The most important fact is that they said nothing at the time, and suddenly it comes out now before the election. It tells what is important here.

Timing is everything. Honestly, if the worst thing a president does is grab a little ass... I mean look at Kennedy. Probably the biggest womanizer in presidential history and somehow no one has a problem with him. If he were still alive and heard about the Trump groping "scandal," he would be like "...yes? And...??"

That's because Kennedy left them begging for more, trump on the other hand left them pukeing and crying in the shower..

If Kennedy was a hobo he still would be able to pull amazing tail, on the other hand if trunk only owned a house, few cars and had 100k in the bank he would struggle to get a handjob in a brothel

I dunno. There are women out there who would be just as turned on by Trump's bank account. And I don't think it's fair to say that women are okay with groping so long as it's done by a handsome man.

Bottom line: if the only dirt that they can dig up is that he talked about groping a woman a decade ago, then BFD.

I wasn't implying the Kennedy groped anybody against their will. I was implying that Kennedy knew the moves and was good looking. Meanwhile trump seems to significantly lack those skills so he has to fall back on his fathers wealth.

So basically, the behavior that women will tolerate can be summed up by: "Be attractive and don't be unattractive?" Again, I don't think that's fair to women. Also, again, I think there are just as many women who could give a fuck about the looks would in fact be just as ok with groping because it's coming from a rich man. If you think Trump has to rely on his wealth to get women, fair enough, but again tale as old as time. And it doesn't make it less yawn-worthy that that's literally the only thing the media can find to grill him about.

Not true. There are plenty of women who would find Trump attractive enough. He is big and tall with blond hair, and when he was younger, he had better skin too. He also has the rich entitled pushy New Yorker type A personality that women adore.

OMG SO TRUE

s/Trump or Trump Rallies/Any known dissendent